Jump to content

Opinion polling for the 2019 Canadian federal election

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amrcmln (talk | contribs) at 18:09, 27 November 2020 (→Quebec). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page provides a list of scientific, nationwide public opinion polls that were conducted from the 2015 Canadian federal election leading up to the 2019 Canadian federal election, which was held on October 21. For riding-specific polls see 2019 constituency polls.

National polls

Campaign period

Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the 2019 Canadian federal election campaign, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are local regressions, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a logarithmic function of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.
Polling firm Last date
of polling[1] 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
2019 election October 21, 2019 HTML 33.1 34.3 16.0 7.6 6.5 1.6 1.2
Nanos Research October 20, 2019 PDF 31.7 32.5 20.8 7.2 6.0 1.5 ±3.6 pp 800 telephone 0.8
Mainstreet Research October 20, 2019 HTML 31.6 32.2 18.3 7.9 6.1 2.8 ±2.17 pp 2,032 IVR 0.6
Research Co. October 20, 2019 HTML 32 31 19 7 8 2 ±3.1 pp 957 online 1
EKOS October 20, 2019 PDF 34.2 30.0 18.3 5.0 8.1 3.5 ±2.2 pp 1,994 telephone/IVR 4.2
Campaign Research October 20, 2019 HTML 31.4 31.3 17.8 6.6 9.1 2.7 ±1.4 pp 1,498 online (rolling) 0.1
Ipsos October 19, 2019 HTML 31 33 18 7 6 3 ±2 pp 3,108 online/telephone 2
Abacus Data October 19, 2019 HTML 34 32 16 8 8 2 ±2.1 pp 2,000 online 2
Nanos Research October 19, 2019 PDF 31.0 31.5 18.8 7.0 9.5 1.8 ±2.4 pp 1,600 (1/2) telephone (rolling) 0.5
Campaign Research October 19, 2019 HTML 31.7 31.4 17.4 6.6 9.1 2.7 ±1.6 pp 1,554 online (rolling) 0.3
Forum Research October 18, 2019 PDF 31.7 29.9 17.5 9.0 8.3 3.0 ±3 pp 1,206 IVR 1.8
Leger October 18, 2019 PDF 33 33 18 8 6 2 ±2.13 pp 2,117 online 0
Mainstreet Research October 18, 2019 HTML 32.8 31.9 18.3 7.2 5.5 3.3 ±2.11 pp 2,134 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.9
Nanos Research October 18, 2019 PDF 32.6 30.3 18.4 7.1 9.3 1.9 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.3
Campaign Research October 18, 2019 HTML 31 31 18 7 9 3 ±2.2 pp 1,987 online 0
Innovative Research October 17, 2019 PDF 33 31 14 9 8 4 N/A 1,964 online 2
Innovative Research October 17, 2019 PDF 34 30 19 6 8 2 N/A 3,094 online 4
EKOS October 17, 2019 PDF 31.0 32.5 17.6 5.5 7.9 3.6 ±2.3 pp 1,881 telephone/IVR 1.5
Mainstreet Research October 17, 2019 HTML 32.1 31.9 18.8 7.6 5.8 3.0 ±2.11 pp 2,163 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.2
Nanos Research October 17, 2019 PDF 31.5 31.6 19.0 6.2 9.5 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.1
DART/Maru October 16, 2019 PDF 29 33 21 8 7 2 ±2.9 pp 1,518 online 4
Forum Research October 16, 2019 PDF 30 29 20 7 8 4 ±3 pp 1,028 IVR 1
Mainstreet Research October 16, 2019 HTML 31.9 30.9 18.6 7.6 7.0 3.2 ±2.12 pp 2,128 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 1.0
Nanos Research October 16, 2019 PDF 31.5 32.5 18.9 6.0 9.2 1.6 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.0
Mainstreet Research October 15, 2019 HTML 30.9 30.6 18.3 7.9 7.7 3.6 ±2.15 pp 2,070 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research October 15, 2019 PDF 31.9 32.5 18.8 5.9 9.4 1.1 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.6
Angus Reid October 15, 2019 PDF 29 33 19 8 8 3 ±2.0 pp 2,100 online 4
EKOS October 15, 2019 PDF 31.2 31.8 18.4 6.4 6.8 3.4 ±2.3 pp 1,904 telephone/IVR 0.6
Mainstreet Research October 14, 2019 HTML 30.7 31.1 17.2 8.1 8.5 3.6 ±2.15 pp 2,076 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.4
Ipsos October 13, 2019 HTML 30 32 20 7 8 2 ±2.4 pp 2,204 online/telephone 2
Mainstreet Research October 13, 2019 HTML 30.7 32.3 16.6 7.8 8.3 3.4 ±2.11 pp 2,150 IVR (rolling) 1.6
Nanos Research October 13, 2019 PDF 32.3 32.1 19.2 5.9 9.3 1.0 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.2
Nanos Research October 12, 2019 PDF 31.5 32.3 19.7 6.2 9.0 1.1 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.8
Nanos Research October 11, 2019 PDF 33.2 32.1 18.1 5.9 8.9 1.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.1
Abacus Data October 10, 2019 HTML 32 32 18 6 9 2 ±1.9 pp 3,000 online 0
Campaign Research October 10, 2019 HTML 29 31 19 7 10 3 ±1.54 pp 4,037 online 2
Mainstreet Research October 10, 2019 HTML 28.9 31.7 16.6 7.6 9.4 4.2 ±2 pp 2,274 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.8
Nanos Research October 10, 2019 PDF 35.4 33.2 15.3 5.3 8.8 1.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.2
Innovative Research October 10, 2019 PDF 35 31 15 6 10 3 N/A 2,394 online 4
Angus Reid October 10, 2019 PDF 29 34 17 7 9 3 ±1.8 pp 3,031 online 5
EKOS October 10, 2019 PDF 30.5 31.7 13.1 5.4 12.8 4.7 ±2.2 pp 1,947 telephone/IVR 1.2
DART/Maru October 9, 2019 PDF 28 33 20 9 7 2 ±3.1 pp 1,510 online 5
Mainstreet Research October 9, 2019 HTML 30.2 32.2 15.1 7.2 9.8 4.0 ±2.04 pp 2,309 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.0
Nanos Research October 9, 2019 PDF 36.9 33.2 14.1 5.1 8.2 1.6 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 3.7
Leger October 8, 2019 PDF 31 31 18 7 11 3 ±2.11 pp 2,150 online 0
Forum Research October 8, 2019 PDF 28 35 13 7 12 3 ±3 pp 1,013 IVR 7
Mainstreet Research October 8, 2019 HTML 31.7 32.0 14.3 6.1 10.3 4.2 ±2 pp 2,445 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research October 8, 2019 PDF 35.6 34.8 13.4 5.2 9.1 1.2 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.8
Mainstreet Research October 7, 2019 HTML 32.6 33.1 13.2 6.5 10.1 3.4 ±2.11 pp 2,108 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.5
Nanos Research October 7, 2019 PDF 34.6 34.8 13.5 5.1 9.8 1.1 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.2
Ipsos October 7, 2019 HTML 35 34 15 7 7 2 ±2.9 pp 1,502 online 1
Innovative Research October 7, 2019 PDF 35 33 13 5 10 4 N/A 2,835 online 2
Mainstreet Research October 6, 2019 HTML 33.1 33.3 13.3 6.3 9.7 2.9 ±2.13 pp 2,108 IVR (rolling) 0.2
Nanos Research October 6, 2019 PDF 34.3 33.4 15.0 5.1 9.6 1.5 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.9
Abacus Data October 5, 2019 HTML 35 33 16 5 8 1 ±2 pp 1,556 online 2
Nanos Research October 5, 2019 PDF 36.7 32.7 15.0 4.9 8.0 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 4.0
Nanos Research October 4, 2019 PDF 36.2 32.6 15.6 5.8 7.4 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 3.6
Mainstreet Research October 3, 2019 HTML 34.3 34.8 11.4 5.8 9.1 3.2 ±2.07 pp 2,207 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.5
Nanos Research October 3, 2019 PDF 36.3 34.3 13.8 5.9 8.2 1.2 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.0
Campaign Research October 2, 2019 HTML 32 34 14 5 11 3 ±1.4 pp 4,755 online 2
Mainstreet Research October 2, 2019 HTML 33.4 36.4 11.9 5.7 9.0 2.5 ±2.07 pp 2,234 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 3.0
Nanos Research October 2, 2019 PDF 32.9 35.2 14.9 5.5 9.9 1.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.3
Forum Research October 1, 2019 PDF 34 31 12 6 12 4 ±3 pp 1,853 IVR 3
Mainstreet Research October 1, 2019 HTML 33.5 36.0 11.6 5.3 10.0 2.8 ±2.06 pp 2,259 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.5
Nanos Research October 1, 2019 PDF 34.2 33.9 15.2 4.5 10.2 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.3
Mainstreet Research September 30, 2019 HTML 33.3 36.1 11.6 5.3 10.0 2.9 ±2.1 pp 2,183 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.8
Nanos Research September 30, 2019 PDF 32.2 34.5 14.3 4.4 11.1 3.0 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.3
Leger September 30, 2019 PDF 34 34 14 5 11 2 ±2.48 pp 1,558 online 0
Angus Reid September 30, 2019 PDF 30 37 14 7 8 3 ±3 pp 1,522 online 7
Ipsos September 30, 2019 HTML 34 37 15 5 7 2 ±2.9 pp 1,489 online 3
Mainstreet Research September 29, 2019 HTML 34.4 34.1 10.9 5.6 10.5 3.4 ±2.12 pp 2,140 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research September 29, 2019 PDF 32.7 34.0 13.2 4.1 12.6 2.5 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.3
EKOS September 29, 2019 PDF 33.4 31.1 11.4 3.0 13.4 5.1 ±2.5 pp 1,492 telephone/IVR 2.3
Mainstreet Research September 28, 2019 HTML 34.0 33.7 11.7 5.8 10.1 3.7 ±2.06 pp 2,270 (2/3) IVR (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research September 28, 2019 PDF 32.5 34.2 13.0 4.6 12.6 2.1 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.7
Nanos Research September 27, 2019 PDF 32.6 34.1 14.4 3.8 13.2 1.3 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.5
Research Co. September 26, 2019 HTML 36 33 15 5 9 2 ±3.1 pp 1,000 online 3
Mainstreet Research September 26, 2019 HTML 33.4 35.6 10.7 5.6 9.7 3.7 ±1.98 pp 2,436 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.2
Nanos Research September 26, 2019 PDF 34.4 33.7 15.0 4.4 10.5 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.7
Abacus Data September 26, 2019 HTML 35 33 15 5 10 2 ±2.3 pp 1,975 online 2
Mainstreet Research September 25, 2019 HTML 34.4 35.8 10.7 5.5 9.2 3.4 ±2.1 pp 2,425 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 1.4
Nanos Research September 25, 2019 PDF 35.5 33.6 14.5 4.7 9.5 2.0 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.9
Innovative Research September 25, 2019 PDF 35 31 14 5 10 5 N/A 2,302 online 4
Mainstreet Research September 24, 2019 HTML 35.2 35.5 10.8 5.2 9.3 2.9 ±2.1 pp 2,389 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research September 24, 2019 PDF 35.3 35.4 12.7 5.5 8.8 2.1 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.1
Leger September 24, 2019 PDF 34 33 13 5 11 4 ±2.11 pp 2,153 online 1
Innovative Research September 24, 2019 PDF 35 34 12 5 10 4 N/A 2,496 online 1
Mainstreet Research September 23, 2019 HTML 34.4 35.9 11.2 4.8 9.6 ±2.03 pp 2,333 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 1.5
Nanos Research September 23, 2019 PDF 35.1 33.5 12.9 5.7 10.1 2.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.6
Angus Reid September 23, 2019 PDF 30 35 15 6 11 3 ±2.5 pp 1,523 online 5
Ipsos September 23, 2019 HTML 32 36 15 4 11 2 ±2.9 pp 1,500 online 4
Mainstreet Research September 22, 2019 HTML 33.7 35.8 ±2.1 pp 2,168 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.1
Nanos Research September 22, 2019 PDF 33.1 34.3 12.8 5.8 10.6 2.9 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.2
EKOS September 22, 2019 PDF 32.0 35.3 10.9 4.9 10.3 4.1 ±2.8 pp 1,272 IVR 3.3
Abacus Data September 22, 2019 HTML 32 34 15 4 10 3 ±2.3 pp 1,929 online 2
Mainstreet Research September 21, 2019 HTML 33.9 34.8 11.4 4.9 10.7 3.6 ±2.13 pp 2,124 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 0.9
Forum Research September 21, 2019 PDF 33 33 11 6 11 5 ±3 pp 2,449 IVR 0
Nanos Research September 21, 2019 PDF 32.9 35.5 14.0 5.3 9.5 2.2 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.6
DART/Maru September 20, 2019 PDF 30 37 15 6 8 3 ±2.9 pp 1,520 online 7
Mainstreet Research September 20, 2019 HTML 35.9 34.2 10.9 4.8 10.4 3.1 ±2.14 pp 2,087 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 1.7
Nanos Research September 20, 2019 PDF 32.0 36.8 13.7 5.4 9.0 2.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 4.8
Mainstreet Research September 19, 2019 HTML 36.8 34.2 10.1 4.7 9.8 3.7 ±2.14 pp 2,087 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.6
Nanos Research September 19, 2019 PDF 34.2 37.4 12.8 3.5 9.3 2.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 3.2
Mainstreet Research September 18, 2019 HTML 37.2 34.4 9.8 4.4 10.1 3.3 ±2.21 pp 1,935 (2/3) IVR (rolling) 2.8
Nanos Research September 18, 2019 PDF 35.0 37.8 11.8 4.0 7.7 2.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.8
Nanos Research September 17, 2019 PDF 35.5 37.2 13.6 4.0 7.0 1.7 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.7
Leger September 17, 2019 PDF 34 33 12 5 11 4 ±2.45 pp 1,598 online 1
Mainstreet Research September 16, 2019 HTML 36.8 34.8 9.7 4.5 9.4 3.8 ±2.23 pp 1,935 (1/3) IVR (rolling) 2.0
Nanos Research September 16, 2019 PDF 34.9 35.9 15.4 4.7 6.5 1.8 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 1.0
Angus Reid September 16, 2019 PDF 33 36 13 5 9 4 ±2.0 pp 2,154 online 3
Mainstreet Research September 15, 2019 Twitter HTML 36.5 35.0 9.6 4.3 9.9 3.5 ±2.23 pp 1,935 IVR (rolling) 1.5
Nanos Research September 15, 2019 PDF 34.0 34.4 16.4 4.4 7.8 2.3 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 0.4
Innovative Research September 15, 2019 PDF 35 32 14 4 11 4 N/A 1,622 online 3
Nanos Research September 14, 2019 PDF 35.2 32.3 16.6 3.8 9.6 2.0 ±2.8 pp 1,200 (1/3) telephone (rolling) 2.9
Ipsos September 13, 2019 HTML 35 35 14 4 9 2 ±2.2 pp 2,562 online/telephone 0
Nanos Research September 13, 2019 PDF 35.4 32.8 15.7 3.6 9.5 2.4 ±2.8 pp 1,200 telephone (rolling) 2.6
DART/Maru September 11, 2019 PDF 32 35 15 6 8 2 ±2.9 pp 1,517 online 3
Forum Research September 11, 2019 PDF 32.4 36.3 8.6 4.1 11.6 4.9 ±3 pp 1,001 IVR 3.9

Pre-campaign period

Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the pre-campaign period of the 2019 Canadian federal election, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are local regressions, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a logarithmic function of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.
Polling firm Last date
of polling[1] 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[5] Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Abacus Data September 10, 2019 HTML 33 35 15 4 10 3 ±2.2 pp 2,000 online 2
Leger September 9, 2019 PDF 34 35 11 5 11 3 ±2.49 pp 1,546 online 1
Mainstreet Research September 8, 2019 HTML 37.5 34.0 8.4 3.6 10.8 4.6 ±2.26 pp 1,876 IVR 3.5
Nanos Research September 6, 2019 HTML 34.6 30.7 16.5 4.0 11.0 2.0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.9
Campaign Research September 5, 2019 HTML 34 34 12 4 12 2 ±2.14 pp 2,094 online 0
Innovative Research September 5, 2019 PDF 33 34 13 5 11 5 N/A 3,236 online 1
Nanos Research August 30, 2019 HTML 35.4 31.3 15.7 4.4 10.3 1.6 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.1
EKOS August 29, 2019 PDF 37.2 32.9 7.2 5.5 10.4 4.3 ±3.3 pp 902 IVR 4.3
Leger August 29, 2019 PDF 34 33 12 5 12 3 ±2.14 pp 2,102 online 1
Abacus Data August 29, 2019 HTML 33 34 17 4 9 3 ±1.5 pp 4,549 online 1
Angus Reid August 26, 2019 PDF 32 36 14 4 9 4 ±2.5 pp 1,534 online 4
Nanos Research August 23, 2019 HTML 33.66 33.65 14.87 4.17 9.41 2.09 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.01
EKOS August 22, 2019 PDF 33.1 34.1 10.4 5.1 11.2 3.7 ±2.9 pp 1,182 IVR 1.0
Leger August 19, 2019 PDF 33 33 11 4 13 4 ±2.5 pp 1,535 online 0
Ipsos August 19, 2019 HTML 33 35 18 3 9 1 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 2
Abacus Data August 19, 2019 HTML 32 32 17 4 10 3 ±2.2 pp 2,152 online 0
DART/Maru August 17, 2019 PDF 32 39 15 5 7 1 ±2.9 pp 1,512 online 7
Nanos Research August 16, 2019 HTML 34.61 31.41 14.58 4.16 10.00 1.68 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.20
Campaign Research August 13, 2019 HTML 32 33 13 4 12 3 ±2 pp 2,365 online 1
Nanos Research August 9, 2019 HTML 35.00 32.46 14.75 3.69 9.80 1.33 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.54
Abacus Data August 6, 2019 HTML 32 33 17 4 10 3 ±2.7 pp 1,422 online 1
Nanos Research August 2, 2019 Twitter 36.7 30.8 16.1 3.7 9.3 1.4 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/2) telephone (rolling) 5.9
Mainstreet Research July 31, 2019 HTML 34.5 34.1 11.1 4.4 11.1 3.3 ±1.97 pp 2,463 IVR 0.4
Innovative Research July 31, 2019 PDF 36 32 14 4 10 4 N/A 1,804 online 4
Forum Research July 28, 2019 PDF 31 34 12 5 12 5 ±3 pp 1,733 IVR 3
EKOS July 25, 2019 PDF 30.6 36.0 9.9 4.6 12.9 3.8 ±2.9 pp 1,115 IVR 5.4
Leger July 23, 2019 PDF 33 36 11 4 12 3 ±2.5 pp 1,536 online 3
EKOS July 18, 2019 PDF 33.6 31.3 12.5 3.1 12.5 4.8 ±2.9 pp 1,186 IVR 2.3
Nanos Research July 19, 2019 Twitter 35.6 30.0 18.6 4.0 9.0 1.4 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.6
Research Co. July 17, 2019 HTML 34 31 17 4 10 3 ±3.1 pp 1,000 online 3
Abacus Data July 17, 2019 HTML 32 32 16 4 11 3 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 0
Ipsos July 15, 2019 HTML 31 37 18 5 7 1 ±3.5 pp 1,000 online 6
Campaign Research July 12, 2019 HTML 33 32 14 4 14 3 ±2.3 pp 1,896 online 1
Angus Reid July 12, 2019 PDF 30 38 14 4 10 2 ±2.0 pp 2,361 online 8
Nanos Research July 12, 2019 PDF 35.9 29.7 18.5 4.8 8.3 1.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.2
EKOS July 8, 2019 PDF 30.7 32.3 10.8 5.0 14.9 4.2 ±3.2 pp 948 IVR 1.6
Innovative Research July 8, 2019 PDF 35 32 12 4 11 5 N/A 2,515 online 3
Nanos Research July 5, 2019 PDF 34.6 30.4 17.9 4.9 8.8 1.6 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.2
Abacus Data July 2, 2019 HTML 32 33 16 4 11 3 ±1.8 pp 3,092 online 1
Mainstreet Research July 2, 2019 HTML 35.0 33.2 10.4 4.5 10.3 4.6 ±1.9 pp 2,651 IVR 1.8
EKOS June 29, 2019 HTML 31.6 34.1 9.7 3.8 12.6 5.7 N/A 1,194 IVR 2.5
Nanos Research June 28, 2019 PDF 34.5 31.7 16.5 4.6 9.8 0.9 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.8
DART/Maru June 26, 2019 PDF 33 37 17 5 7 1 ±2.9 pp 1,512 online 4
Forum Research June 23, 2019 PDF 29 35 13 5 12 4 ±3 pp 1,539 IVR 6
Nanos Research June 21, 2019 PDF 32.5 32.8 16.9 4.9 10.2 0.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.3
EKOS June 17, 2019 PDF 30.1 34.2 12.0 4.3 13.2 3.6 ±2.0 pp 2,491 IVR 4.1
Nanos Research June 14, 2019 PDF 30.3 34.0 16.8 4.6 11.4 0.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.7
Leger June 10, 2019 PDF 29 38 13 4 11 3 ±2.5 pp 1,528 online 9
Ipsos June 7, 2019 HTML 31 37 18 5 6 ±3.5 pp 1,003 online 6
Nanos Research June 7, 2019 PDF 30.9 34.2 16.9 4.0 11.3 0.8 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.3
Campaign Research June 6, 2019 HTML 32 35 14 4 12 2 ±1.9 pp 2,735 online 3
Angus Reid June 4, 2019 PDF 26 37 15 5 12 4 ±2 pp 4,698 online 11
Forum Research June 2, 2019 PDF 30 34 13 6 13 4 ±3 pp 1,633 IVR 4
Nanos Research May 31, 2019 PDF 29.5 34.3 16.4 4.4 11.5 0.8 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.8
Innovative Research May 30, 2019 PDF 33 33 12 5 13 N/A 1,691 online 0
Abacus Data May 30, 2019 HTML 33 32 16 3 12 3 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 1
Nanos Research May 24, 2019 PDF 29.2 34.8 15.6 4.7 11.5 1.6 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.6
Nanos Research May 17, 2019 PDF 30.6 35.9 14.2 4.0 11.1 1.1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.3
Nanos Research May 10, 2019 PDF 29.7 35.4 15.0 4.4 11.3 0.9 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.7
Nanos Research May 3, 2019 PDF 31.8 34.5 15.9 4.6 9.7 0.9 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.7
Campaign Research May 1, 2019 HTML 31 35 17 3 10 2 ±2.6 pp 1,471 online 4
Angus Reid April 30, 2019 PDF 25 38 18 5 11 3 ±2.5 pp 1,525 online 13
Abacus Data April 30, 2019 HTML 31 34 17 4 9 3 ±1.5 pp 4,015 online 3
Nanos Research April 26, 2019 PDF 32.0 34.9 16.5 4.1 9.0 0.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.9
Ipsos April 25, 2019 HTML 32 36 19 5 ±3.5 pp 1,000 online 4
Forum Research April 24, 2019 PDF 30 37 14 6 9 2 ±3 pp 1,595 IVR 7
Leger April 22, 2019 PDF 27 40 12 5 11 3 ±2.5 pp 1,522 online 13
Nanos Research April 18, 2019 PDF 33.0 35.5 15.2 4.7 8.4 0.8 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.5
Nanos Research April 12, 2019 PDF 34.1 35.0 14.9 4.5 8.8 0.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.9
Innovative Research April 10, 2019 PDF 36 32 13 4 10 N/A 2,527 online 4
Forum Research April 6, 2019 PDF 29 42 12 6 9 2 ±3 pp 1,634 IVR 13
Campaign Research April 6, 2019 HTML 32 34 15 5 10 3 ±2.2 pp 2,035 online 2
Nanos Research April 5, 2019 PDF 32.8 34.9 16.6 4.0 9.5 0.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.1
Nanos Research March 29, 2019 PDF 34.6 35.1 16.6 4.4 8.1 0.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.5
Ipsos March 27, 2019 HTML 30 40 21 5 ±3.5 pp 1,002 online 10
Mainstreet Research March 25, 2019 HTML 35.0 37.4 11.6 3.1 7.9 3.8 ±1.06 pp 8,501 IVR 2.4
Angus Reid March 25, 2019 PDF 28 37 17 5 8 4 ±2 pp 5,807 online 9
Nanos Research March 22, 2019 PDF 32.5 34.6 19.4 3.9 8.3 0.6 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.1
Forum Research March 20, 2019 PDF 35 41 14 1 6 2 ±3 pp 1,490 IVR 6
Leger March 20, 2019 PDF 31 37 14 4 10 3 ±2.51 pp 1,513 online 6
Nanos Research March 15, 2019 PDF 32.6 35.5 19.9 3.2 7.7 0.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.9
Abacus Data March 10, 2019 Twitter 32 34 16 4 11 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 2
Campaign Research March 10, 2019 HTML 30 36 16 4 10 2 ±2.5 pp 1,893 online 6
Abacus Data March 9, 2019 HTML 31 35 16 4 11 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 4
Abacus Data March 8, 2019 HTML 31 36 15 5 10 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 5
Nanos Research March 8, 2019 PDF 32.9 36.1 17.9 3.6 8.3 0.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.2
Abacus Data March 7, 2019 HTML 33 34 16 4 10 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 1
Abacus Data March 6, 2019 HTML 32 34 18 4 9 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 2
Abacus Data March 5, 2019 HTML 31 35 17 4 9 ±3.3 pp 900 (1/3) online (rolling) 4
Innovative Research March 4, 2019 PDF 36 32 13 5 9 5 N/A 2,122 online 4
Ipsos March 4, 2019 HTML 31 40 20 4 4 0 ±3.5 pp 1,000 online 9
Abacus Data March 4, 2019 HTML 30 36 17 5 9 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 6
Nanos Research March 1, 2019 PDF 34.2 34.7 15.5 3.6 9.1 0.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.5
Forum Research February 28, 2019 PDF 33 42 12 3 5 4 ±3 pp 1,301 IVR 9
Abacus Data February 26, 2019 HTML 32 33 17 4 9 ±2.1 pp 2,374 online 1
Angus Reid February 24, 2019 PDF 31 38 14 5 8 ±3.1 pp 1,009 online 7
Nanos Research February 22, 2019 PDF 35.7 33.6 15.0 3.7 8.4 1.2 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.1
Leger February 19, 2019 PDF 34 36 12 5 8 4 ±2.51 pp 1,529 online 2
Ipsos February 18, 2019 HTML 34 36 17 6 ±3.5 pp 1,002 online 2
Nanos Research February 15, 2019 PDF 37.9 31.8 13.7 4.1 7.8 1.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.1
Abacus Data February 11, 2019 HTML 33 35 15 4 9 ±2.0 pp 2,500 online 2
Campaign Research February 11, 2019 HTML 32 37 14 5 7 3 ±2.5 pp 1,590 online 5
Nanos Research February 8, 2019 PDF 37.5 34.4 13.0 3.8 7.4 1.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.1
Abacus Data February 5, 2019 HTML 34 34 17 4 8 ±2.0 pp 2,500 online 0
Nanos Research February 1, 2019 PDF 37.6 35.9 13.2 3.1 7.9 1.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.7
Nanos Research January 25, 2019 PDF 37.6 36.6 12.8 3.0 8.1 1.2 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.0
Innovative Research January 24, 2019 PDF 38 32 12 5 8 4 N/A 2,451 online 6
Mainstreet Research January 18, 2019 HTML 37.2 35.1 11.5 3.2 7.2 4.2 ±1.1 pp 7,941 IVR 2.1
Nanos Research January 18, 2019 PDF 37.2 36.1 14.2 3.2 7.4 1.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.1
Yves-François Blanchet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (January 17, 2019)
Nanos Research January 11, 2019 PDF 38.1 33.9 15.4 3.3 6.9 1.6 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.2
Innovative Research January 7, 2019 PDF 36 33 15 5 8 4 N/A 2,700 online 3
Nanos Research January 4, 2019 PDF 38.7 33.3 16.7 3.0 6.0 1.4 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.4
Nanos Research December 28, 2018 PDF 36.8 34.4 16.1 3.4 6.4 1.2 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.4
Nanos Research December 21, 2018 PDF 35.2 34.1 16.0 3.8 7.0 1.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.1
Abacus Data December 18, 2018 HTML 35 34 17 4 7 ±2.5 pp 2,000 online 1
Nanos Research December 14, 2018 PDF 36.0 33.9 16.6 3.4 6.6 0.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.1
Campaign Research December 13, 2018 HTML 33 35 16 4 8 2 ±2.5 pp 1,494 online 2
Ipsos December 12, 2018 HTML 38 33 18 4 ±2.5 pp 2,001 online 5
Nanos Research December 7, 2018 PDF 34.1 34.8 15.8 3.1 8.2 0.8 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.7
Nanos Research November 30, 2018 PDF 37.9 32.2 14.3 3.0 7.6 0.8 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.7
Forum Research November 29, 2018 PDF 34 43 11 4 6 ±3 pp 1,541 IVR 9
Nanos Research November 23, 2018 PDF 39.6 31.5 14.5 2.4 6.9 1.1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.1
Leger November 20, 2018 PDF 39 33 14 4 5 4 ±2.51 pp 1,521 online 6
Nanos Research November 16, 2018 PDF 39.4 28.7 17.2 2.5 7.3 1.1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 10.7
Innovative Research November 15, 2018 PDF 38 32 14 4 8 3 N/A 2,490 online 6
Abacus Data November 13, 2018 HTML 38 31 16 4 9 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 7
Campaign Research November 9, 2018 HTML 35 35 17 4 7 ±2.5 pp 2,512 online 0
Nanos Research November 9, 2018 PDF 39.4 27.5 19.8 2.0 6.1 1.4 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.9
Mainstreet Research November 7, 2018 HTML 39.3 34.6 10.8 3.4 6.8 3.8 ±1.09 pp 7,961 IVR 4.7
Nanos Research November 2, 2018 PDF 39.6 28.1 19.3 1.9 6.9 1.2 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.5
Nanos Research October 26, 2018 PDF 39.4 28.2 19.3 2.8 6.5 1.0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.2
Nanos Research October 19, 2018 PDF 39.5 29.4 16.9 3.6 7.0 1.4 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 10.1
Nanos Research October 12, 2018 PDF 37.1 31.4 16.1 3.7 7.2 1.3 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.7
Forum Research October 10, 2018 PDF 32 41 15 4 7 ±3 pp 1,226 IVR 9
Ipsos October 9, 2018 PDF 36 35 20 4 ±2.5 pp 2,001 online 1
Nanos Research October 5, 2018 PDF 37.3 31.1 16.2 3.8 6.7 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.2
Innovative Research October 1, 2018 PDF 38 31 15 5 7 3 N/A 2,410 online 7
Nanos Research September 28, 2018 PDF 38.0 31.7 16.7 2.6 6.0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.3
Nanos Research September 21, 2018 PDF 39.0 31.2 17.0 2.4 5.5 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.8
Pollara September 20, 2018 PDF 40 34 12 3 7 2 ±3.1 pp 1,002 online 6
Abacus Data September 19, 2018 HTML 38 34 17 3 7 ±2.2 pp 2,000 online 4
DART/Maru September 19, 2018 PDF 30 38 17 5 8 ±2.1 pp 5,769 online 8
Maxime Bernier forms the People's Party of Canada following his resignation from the Conservative Party caucus (September 14, 2018)
Campaign Research September 14, 2018 HTML 36 38 15 5 7 0 ±2.5 pp 1,486 online 2
Nanos Research September 14, 2018 PDF 41.1 31.4 14.9 2.0 5.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.7
Nanos Research September 7, 2018 PDF 39.9 32.8 14.9 2.5 6.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.1
Nanos Research August 31, 2018 PDF 39.9 32.4 15.8 3.4 6.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.5
Abacus Data August 25, 2018 HTML 37 34 18 3 6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 online 3
Nanos Research August 24, 2018 PDF 38.8 34.4 16.5 2.9 6.3 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.4
Abacus Data August 20, 2018 HTML 37 33 18 3 8 0 ±2.5 pp 1,500 online 4
Nanos Research August 17, 2018 PDF 37.5 33.9 19.0 3.2 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.6
Forum Research August 12, 2018 PDF 36 42 15 2 4 0 ±3 pp 1,777 IVR 6
Nanos Research August 10, 2018 PDF 35.8 35.1 20.1 3.2 4.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.7
Nanos Research August 3, 2018 PDF 36.9 36.6 17.8 2.3 5.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.3
Nanos Research July 27, 2018 PDF 35.8 35.2 19.1 2.2 6.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.6
EKOS July 26, 2018 Twitter 34.9 32.1 17.3 4.0 9.3 0 ±2.7 pp 1,302 IVR 2.8
Abacus Data July 22, 2018 HTML 36 34 19 3 7 0 ±2.2 pp 2,000 online 2
Nanos Research July 20, 2018 PDF 35.8 35.9 19.0 2.0 6.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.1
Mainstreet Research July 17, 2018 HTML 39.4 36.9 11.8 2.4 7.0 0 ±1.01 pp 9,384 IVR 2.5
Ipsos July 16, 2018 HTML 39 32 21 2 0 ±3.5 pp 1,000 online 7
Nanos Research July 13, 2018 PDF 37.3 34.5 18.4 1.8 7.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.8
Nanos Research July 6, 2018 PDF 35.7 33.4 20.3 2.4 6.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.3
Ipsos June 29, 2018 HTML 33 37 21 3 0 ±3.5 pp 1,002 online 4
Nanos Research June 29, 2018 PDF 36.5 33.1 20.8 2.7 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.4
Nanos Research June 22, 2018 PDF 36.7 32.0 20.6 3.6 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.7
Campaign Research June 18, 2018 HTML 34 36 18 3 8 0 ±2.5 pp 1,579 online 2
Ipsos June 15, 2018 HTML 32 36 20 5 0 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 4
Nanos Research June 15, 2018 PDF 36.9 32.5 19.9 4.1 5.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.4
Angus Reid June 14, 2018 PDF 36 32 16 4 9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,023 online 4
Mario Beaulieu is named interim leader of the Bloc Québécois (June 13, 2018)
Nanos Research June 8, 2018 PDF 35.3 33.0 22.0 4.1 4.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.3
Nanos Research June 1, 2018 PDF 34.1 34.0 21.2 4.4 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 0.1
Forum Research May 31, 2018 PDF 31 44 17 2 5 0 ±3 pp 969 IVR 13
Nanos Research May 25, 2018 PDF 33.0 36.0 19.8 4.0 6.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.0
Nanos Research May 18, 2018 PDF 35.1 34.0 20.1 3.6 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.1
Forum Research May 16, 2018 PDF 30 46 18 2 4 0 ±3 pp 1,484 IVR 16
Innovative Research May 14, 2018 PDF 35 38 15 4 7 0 N/A 2,327 online 3
Nanos Research May 11, 2018 PDF 36.1 34.4 18.5 3.7 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.7
Leger May 10, 2018 HTML 39 36 15 2 0 ±2.1 pp 2,103 online 3
Nanos Research May 4, 2018 PDF 38.0 33.2 17.6 4.2 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.8
Innovative Research May 2, 2018 PDF 35 38 16 4 6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone 3
Ipsos April 30, 2018 HTML 36 35 20 3 0 ±2.6 pp 1,907 online 1
Nanos Research April 27, 2018 PDF 39.2 30.6 18.2 4.4 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.6
Forum Research April 20, 2018 PDF 30 43 14 4 8 0 ±2 pp 1,585 IVR 13
Nanos Research April 20, 2018 PDF 38.2 31.6 17.9 3.7 7.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.6
Mainstreet Research April 18, 2018 HTML 40.4 37.1 11.9 2.6 5.9 0 ±1.01 pp 9,401 IVR 3.3
Nanos Research April 13, 2018 PDF 41.1 29.2 15.8 3.8 8.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.9
Nanos Research April 6, 2018 PDF 38.2 32.9 17.2 3.0 7.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.3
Nanos Research March 29, 2018 PDF 39.1 33.7 16.4 2.4 6.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.4
Ipsos March 23, 2018 HTML 31 38 23 3 0 ±3.5 pp 1,003 online 7
Nanos Research March 23, 2018 PDF 38.1 34.7 16.8 3.1 5.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.4
Nanos Research March 16, 2018 PDF 35.9 34.8 18.5 3.5 6.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 1.1
Angus Reid March 15, 2018 PDF 30 40 19 4 6 0 ±2 pp 5,423 online 10
Nanos Research March 9, 2018 PDF 35.8 33.1 19.3 4.5 6.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 2.7
Leger March 8, 2018 PDF 38 38 14 3 5 0 ±2.5 pp 1,536 online 0
Abacus Data March 4, 2018 PDF 36 33 18 3 8 0 ±2.2 pp 4,023 online 3
Nanos Research March 2, 2018 PDF 36.5 32.7 19.0 4.0 7.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.8
Ipsos March 1, 2018 PDF 33 38 21 3 0 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 5
Forum Research March 1, 2018 PDF 34 46 14 2 3 0 ±3 pp 941 IVR 12
Nanos Research February 23, 2018 PDF 37.7 31.5 19.2 3.8 6.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.2
Nanos Research February 16, 2018 PDF 36.6 30.8 20.3 3.3 8.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.8
Campaign Research February 10, 2018 HTML 39 32 16 4 7 0 ±2.1 pp 2,227 online 7
Nanos Research February 9, 2018 PDF 38.1 30.4 18.5 3.1 8.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.7
Nanos Research February 2, 2018 PDF 38.1 30.3 19.7 3.0 7.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.8
Abacus Data January 28, 2018 PDF 39 32 18 4 6 0 ±2.7 pp 1,411 online 7
Nanos Research January 26, 2018 PDF 37.8 30.6 19.9 3.5 7.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.2
Forum Research January 24, 2018 PDF 38 43 12 3 3 0 ±3 pp 1,408 IVR 5
Nanos Research January 19, 2018 PDF 37.9 34.4 17.3 3.7 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.5
Nanos Research January 12, 2018 PDF 37.0 33.8 20.0 3.8 4.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.2
Campaign Research January 11, 2018 HTML 42 29 16 4 7 0 ±2.3 pp 1,887 online 13
Mainstreet Research January 6, 2018 HTML 40.3 34.5 13.1 4.4 7.7 0 ±0.99 pp 9,830 IVR 5.8
Nanos Research January 5, 2018 PDF 40.9 30.7 19.5 3.7 4.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 10.2
Nanos Research December 29, 2017 PDF 41.6 30.1 20.1 3.5 4.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.5
Nanos Research December 22, 2017 PDF 42.8 29.1 20.0 3.3 4.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.7
Nanos Research December 15, 2017 PDF 41.9 29.3 19.1 3.4 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 12.6
Forum Research December 14, 2017 PDF 38 39 12 5 5 0 ±3 pp 1,284 IVR 1
Ipsos December 14, 2017 PDF 38 31 20 5 0 ±2.4 pp 2,098 online 7
Nanos Research December 8, 2017 PDF 40.7 30.3 17.5 3.8 6.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 10.4
Nanos Research December 1, 2017 PDF 40.1 30.7 16.5 4.2 6.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.4
Leger November 30, 2017 PDF 40 34 13 4 8 0 ±2.4 pp 1,609 online 6
Nanos Research November 24, 2017 PDF 38.8 30.6 17.2 4.4 6.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.2
Nanos Research November 17, 2017 PDF 39.3 30.7 16.6 5.0 7.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.6
Abacus Data November 14, 2017 PDF 40 32 18 4 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 8
Nanos Research November 10, 2017 PDF 38.3 30.9 17.5 5.3 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.4
Campaign Research November 9, 2017 HTML 38 30 19 5 7 0 ±1.9 pp 2,616 online 8
Forum Research November 6, 2017 PDF 36 38 14 6 6 0 ±3 pp 1,281 IVR 2
Nanos Research November 3, 2017 PDF 36.6 29.6 19.0 5.9 6.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.0
Nanos Research October 27, 2017 PDF 36.1 29.6 18.5 6.1 6.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.5
Insights West October 26, 2017 HTML 35 33 20 4 7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,005 online 2
Ipsos October 25, 2017 PDF 38 30 23 4 0 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 8
Leger October 25, 2017 PDF 42 30 15 4 7 0 ±2.5 pp 1,534 online 12
Abacus Data October 23, 2017 PDF 39 35 15 5 5 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 4
Nanos Research October 20, 2017 PDF 35.0 30.8 17.7 6.3 6.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.2
Environics October 16, 2017 PDF 38 30 20 5 7 0 2,000 online 8
Nanos Research October 13, 2017 PDF 34.6 31.3 16.3 7.2 7.3 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 3.3
Angus Reid October 12, 2017 PDF 35 35 18 4 6 0 ±2.5 pp 1,492 online 0
Campaign Research October 11, 2017 HTML 38 30 19 4 8 0 ±2.2 pp 2,002 online 8
Nanos Research October 6, 2017 PDF 36.9 32.0 15.4 6.6 5.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 4.9
Angus Reid October 4, 2017 HTML 37 36 14 4 8 0 ±2.5 pp 1,477 online 1
Jagmeet Singh is elected leader of the New Democratic Party (October 1, 2017)
EKOS October 1, 2017 PDF 34.4 33.3 14.5 4.5 8.9 0 ±1.4 pp 4,839 IVR 1.1
Nanos Research September 29, 2017 PDF 38.1 31.2 15.2 6.3 6.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.9
Ipsos September 27, 2017 PDF 39 32 20 5 0 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 7
Nanos Research September 22, 2017 PDF 38.5 32.5 14.6 6.1 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.0
Nanos Research September 15, 2017 PDF 40.9 30.0 15.5 6.0 5.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 10.9
Forum Research September 14, 2017 PDF 35 39 15 5 4 0 ±3 pp 1,350 IVR 4
Campaign Research September 11, 2017 HTML 42 30 16 5 6 0 ±2.3 pp 1,770 online 12
Nanos Research September 8, 2017 PDF 42.0 30.1 15.9 4.6 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.9
Abacus Data September 3, 2017 PDF 43 31 17 3 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,512 online 12
Nanos Research September 1, 2017 PDF 41.2 32.0 15.7 4.9 4.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.2
Mainstreet Research August 31, 2017 HTML 43 32 15 4 5 0 ±2.19 pp 2,000 telephone 11
Nanos Research August 25, 2017 PDF 41.9 30.8 16.4 4.3 5.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.1
Nanos Research August 18, 2017 PDF 39.4 31.0 18.2 5.1 4.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.4
Forum Research August 17, 2017 PDF 42 35 14 4 4 0 ±3 pp 1,150 IVR 7
Nanos Research August 11, 2017 PDF 37.8 31.1 19.2 5.2 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.7
Nanos Research August 4, 2017 PDF 37.5 29.3 20.2 6.4 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.2
Nanos Research July 28, 2017 PDF 36.7 29.1 20.0 5.8 6.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.6
Nanos Research July 21, 2017 PDF 39.0 30.3 18.4 4.2 6.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.7
Abacus Data July 18, 2017 HTML 43 31 16 3 5 0 ±2.2 pp 2,036 online 12
Nanos Research July 14, 2017 PDF 38.3 31.2 16.2 5.9 6.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.1
Campaign Research July 10, 2017 HTML 40 31 19 4 5 0 ±2 pp 1,540 online 9
Nanos Research July 7, 2017 PDF 39.8 33.0 13.6 5.3 6.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.8
Nanos Research June 30, 2017 PDF 38.9 31.6 14.0 6.3 7.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.3
Nanos Research June 23, 2017 PDF 38.3 31.1 15.7 6.8 6.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.2
EKOS June 19, 2017 HTML 35.3 33.0 15.2 3.7 8.5 0 ±1.3 pp 5,658 IVR 2.3
Nanos Research June 16, 2017 PDF 37.5 30.9 16.5 6.7 6.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.6
Campaign Research June 12, 2017 HTML 39 30 19 5 7 0 ±2 pp 2,767 online 9
Angus Reid June 12, 2017 PDF 37 34 17 4 6 0 ±2 pp 5,406 online 3
Nanos Research June 9, 2017 PDF 36.8 30.5 17.3 6.1 7.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 6.3
Forum Research June 8, 2017 PDF 42 34 12 5 6 0 ±3 pp 1,483 IVR 8
Nanos Research June 2, 2017 PDF 40.0 28.1 16.5 6.2 7.3 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.9
Angus Reid May 31, 2017 HTML 40 33 16 4 6 0 ±2.2 pp 1,958 online 7
Mainstreet Research May 29, 2017 HTML 41 33 17 4 5 0 ±1.85 pp 2,800 IVR 8
Andrew Scheer is elected leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (May 27, 2017)
Nanos Research May 26, 2017 PDF 40.3 28.6 16.7 5.7 7.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.7
Nanos Research May 19, 2017 PDF 42.1 27.9 16.2 5.2 7.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 14.2
Leger May 18, 2017 PDF 46 25 16 5 6 0 ±2.5 pp 1,529 online 21
Mainstreet Research May 15, 2017 HTML 41 31 18 5 5 0 ±1.85 pp 2,800 IVR 10
Campaign Research May 13, 2017 HTML 43 27 19 3 7 0 ±2 pp 1,969 online 16
Abacus Data May 12, 2017 PDF 43 27 20 4 5 0 ±2.9 pp 1,182 online 16
Nanos Research May 12, 2017 PDF 42.8 28.1 15.9 6.0 5.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 14.7
Nanos Research May 5, 2017 PDF 41.8 29.0 18.8 5.1 4.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 12.8
Nanos Research April 28, 2017 PDF 43.0 29.6 18.5 4.4 3.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.4
Forum Research April 24, 2017 PDF 35 35 17 5 7 0 ±3 pp 1,479 IVR 0
Nanos Research April 21, 2017 PDF 42.0 30.4 19.0 4.0 2.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.6
Nanos Research April 14, 2017 PDF 41.4 32.4 18.7 3.4 3.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.0
Campaign Research April 11, 2017 HTML 38 29 19 6 6 0 ±2 pp 1,970 online 9
Nanos Research April 7, 2017 PDF 40.3 32.6 18.0 4.0 3.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.7
Nanos Research March 31, 2017 PDF 40.6 29.6 18.4 5.2 4.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 11.0
Ipsos March 30, 2017 PDF 39 32 20 5 0 ±3.5 pp 1,001 online 7
Nanos Research March 24, 2017 PDF 42.5 29.2 16.1 4.8 5.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.3
Forum Research March 23, 2017 PDF 36 38 15 6 4 0 ±3 pp 1,029 IVR 2
Martine Ouellet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (March 18, 2017)
Stratcom March 17, 2017 HTML 44 29 16 4 6 0 ±2.2 pp 2,029 online 15
Nanos Research March 17, 2017 PDF 41.9 28.5 17.1 4.7 5.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.4
Nanos Research March 10, 2017 PDF 41.4 28.1 17.0 4.9 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.3
Campaign Research March 7, 2017 HTML 43 27 16 6 5 0 ±3 pp 1,886 online/IVR 16
Nanos Research March 3, 2017 PDF 39.6 30.5 17.2 5.0 5.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.1
Forum Research February 26, 2017 PDF 39 35 15 7 4 0 ±3 pp 1,340 IVR 4
Nanos Research February 24, 2017 PDF 38.9 31.0 16.8 5.4 5.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.9
Abacus Data February 19, 2017 PDF 40 33 16 4 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 7
Nanos Research February 17, 2017 PDF 39.3 29.6 16.9 6.3 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 9.7
Nanos Research February 10, 2017 PDF 37.9 32.9 16.9 4.8 5.3 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.0
Campaign Research February 6, 2017 HTML 34 34 16 6 6 0 ±3 pp 1,457 IVR 0
Nanos Research February 3, 2017 PDF 38.0 32.5 16.4 4.9 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 5.5
Nanos Research January 27, 2017 PDF 39.1 32.1 16.3 5.1 5.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 7.0
Ipsos January 25, 2017 PDF 41 30 19 5 0 ±3.5 pp 1,000 online 11
Forum Research January 21, 2017 PDF 42 36 12 4 5 0 ±3 pp 1,332 IVR 6
Nanos Research January 20, 2017 PDF 39.4 31.2 16.3 5.1 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 8.2
Nanos Research January 13, 2017 PDF 41.4 28.4 16.2 6.1 6.1 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.0
Nanos Research January 6, 2017 PDF 43.0 28.5 16.2 5.2 5.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 14.5
Nanos Research December 30, 2016 PDF 43.0 27.9 16.7 5.5 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 15.1
Nanos Research December 23, 2016 PDF 42.0 28.3 16.9 5.6 5.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 13.7
Nanos Research December 16, 2016 PDF 43.6 27.4 16.7 4.9 5.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 16.2
Abacus Data December 14, 2016 PDF 44 30 16 4 5 0 ±2.3 pp 1,848 online 14
Nanos Research December 9, 2016 PDF 43.2 26.7 16.5 5.4 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 16.5
Forum Research December 7, 2016 PDF 42 34 12 5 6 0 ±3 pp 1,304 IVR 8
Nanos Research December 2, 2016 PDF 42.9 26.0 17.4 4.8 6.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 16.9
Nanos Research November 25, 2016 PDF 44.7 25.1 17.9 4.4 6.4 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 19.6
EKOS November 22, 2016 PDF 41.2 31.2 13.0 2.4 8.2 0 ±2.2 pp 1,949 IVR 10.0
Nanos Research November 18, 2016 PDF 42.9 28.7 16.0 5.6 5.6 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 14.2
Abacus Data November 13, 2016 PDF 46 25 17 5 7 0 ±2.1 pp 2,200 online 21
Nanos Research November 11, 2016 PDF 46.3 26.2 15.4 4.3 6.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 20.1
Forum Research November 10, 2016 PDF 51 28 11 4 5 0 ±3 pp 1,474 IVR 23
Mainstreet Research November 6, 2016 HTML 49 29 13 4 5 0 ±1.38 pp 5,066 IVR 20
Nanos Research November 4, 2016 PDF 44.9 29.6 13.8 5.5 5.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 15.3
Nanos Research October 28, 2016 PDF 44.5 29.6 13.3 5.3 6.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 14.9
Nanos Research October 21, 2016 PDF 46.6 27.5 13.9 4.0 6.8 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 19.1
EKOS October 18, 2016 PDF 46.6 26.4 14.1 3.3 7.8 0 ±2.4 pp 1,622 online/telephone 20.2
Nanos Research October 14, 2016 PDF 46.3 26.2 15.4 4.3 6.2 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 20.1
Forum Research October 12, 2016 PDF 49 30 12 5 4 0 ±3 pp 1,437 IVR 19
Abacus Data October 12, 2016 PDF 45 28 14 5 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,498 online 17
Nanos Research October 7, 2016 PDF 45.9 25.9 16.2 4.3 5.7 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 (1/4) telephone (rolling) 20.0
Nanos Research September 30, 2016 PDF 45.8 26.2 16.7 4.5 5.0 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone (rolling) 19.6
Forum Research September 21, 2016 PDF 47 34 9 6 3 0 ±3 pp 1,326 IVR 13
Mainstreet Research September 8, 2016 HTML 51 29 12 4 4 0 ±1.35 pp 5,250 IVR 22
Forum Research September 7, 2016 PDF 48 30 11 5 4 0 ±3 pp 1,370 IVR 18
Leger September 1, 2016 PDF 53 25 12 4 5 0 ±2.5 pp 1,535 online 28
Abacus Data August 25, 2016 PDF 46 28 16 4 5 0 ±2.2 pp 2,010 online 18
Forum Research August 6, 2016 PDF 50 31 10 4 4 0 ±3 pp 1,345 IVR 19
EKOS July 14, 2016 PDF 45.6 28.5 15.5 2.8 5.9 0 ±3.1 pp 1,003 online/telephone 17.1
Forum Research July 5, 2016 PDF 52 28 11 5 3 0 ±3 pp 1,429 IVR 24
Abacus Data June 16, 2016 PDF 44 28 16 5 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 16
Forum Research June 7, 2016 PDF 49 32 10 4 4 0 ±2 pp 2,271 IVR 17
EKOS June 7, 2016 PDF 44.7 26.9 12.4 4.1 7.8 0 ±2.0 pp 2,371 IVR 17.8
Ipsos May 24, 2016 HTML 46 30 15 4 0 ±3.5 pp 1,002 online 16
Abacus Data May 20, 2016 PDF 46 27 15 4 7 0 ±2.2 pp 2,000 online 19
Forum Research May 11, 2016 PDF 52 29 11 4 3 0 ±3 pp 1,517 IVR 23
Mainstreet Research April 27, 2016 HTML 49 30 14 3 4 0 ±1.39 pp 4,998 IVR 19
Nanos Research April 22, 2016 HTML 43.2 25.8 19.3 4.2 5.5 0 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone 17.4
Mainstreet Research April 15, 2016 HTML 48 30 14 3 5 0 ±1.38 pp 5,012 IVR 18
EKOS April 15, 2016 PDF 44.1 28.5 12.0 4.4 6.7 0 ±2.9 pp 1,176 IVR 15.6
Abacus Data April 13, 2016 PDF 49 26 13 5 5 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 23
Forum Research April 5, 2016 PDF 51 28 12 6 3 0 ±3 pp 1,455 IVR 23
Innovative Research March 30, 2016 PDF 46 30 12 5 6 0 n/a 2,456 online 16
EKOS March 29, 2016 PDF 42.1 31.7 11.7 4.8 6.4 0 ±2.2 pp 2,019 IVR 10.4
Abacus Data March 23, 2016 PDF 47 28 14 4 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 19
Abacus Data March 18, 2016 PDF 44 29 16 4 6 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 15
Forum Research March 15, 2016 PDF 46 34 12 4 3 0 ±2 pp 1,567 IVR 12
Forum Research February 17, 2016 PDF 49 32 10 3 5 0 ±3 pp 1,406 IVR 17
Leger February 4, 2016 PDF 49 27 15 3 5 0 ±2.1 pp 1,524 online 22
EKOS January 18, 2016 PDF 46.7 25.3 15.9 3.9 7.0 0 ±1.9 pp 2,598 online/telephone 21.4
Mainstreet Research January 15, 2016 HTML 44 32 16 3 5 0 ±1.39 pp 4,937 IVR 12
Abacus Data January 12, 2016 PDF 45 28 17 5 5 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 17
EKOS December 10, 2015 PDF 46.3 27.2 15.3 3.4 6.7 0 ±2.2 pp 1,956 online/telephone 19.1
Forum Research December 8, 2015 PDF 46 32 13 4 4 0 ±3 pp 1,369 IVR 14
Abacus Data November 25, 2015 PDF 49 24 16 5 5 0 ±2.6 pp 1,500 online 25
Forum Research November 17, 2015 PDF 45 37 10 4 3 0 ±3 pp 909 IVR 8
Forum Research November 7, 2015 PDF 55 25 12 4 3 0 ±3 pp 1,256 IVR 30
Rona Ambrose is named interim leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (November 5, 2015)
2015 election October 19, 2015 HTML 39.5 31.9 19.7 4.7 3.4 7.6

Notes

1 Polls that share the same last date of polling are ordered from earliest (below) to latest (above) first date of polling. Polls that have identical field dates are placed in the order in which they were released/published (earliest below, latest above).
2 In cases when linked poll details distinguish between the margin of error associated with the total sample of respondents (including undecided and non-voters) and that of the subsample of decided/leaning voters, the former is included in the table. Also not included is the margin of error created by rounding to the nearest whole number or any margin of error from methodological sources. Most online polls—because of their opt-in method of recruiting panellists which results in a non-random sample—cannot have a margin of error. In such cases, shown is what the margin of error would be for a survey using a random probability-based sample of equivalent size.
3 Refers to the total, "raw" sample size, including undecided and non-voters, and before demographic weighting is applied. Fractions in parentheses apply to rolling polls (see below) and indicate the proportion of the sample that is independent from the previous poll in the series.
4 "Telephone" refers to traditional telephone polls conducted by live interviewers; "IVR" refers to automated Interactive Voice Response polls conducted by telephone; "online" refers to polls conducted exclusively over the internet; "telephone/online" refers to polls which combine results from both telephone and online surveys, or for which respondents are initially recruited by telephone and then asked to complete an online survey. "Rolling" polls contain overlapping data from one poll to the next.
5 The People's Party of Canada was officially created on September 14, 2018 and voting intentions for the party were therefore not polled prior to this date.

Regional polls

A number of polling firms survey federal voting intentions on a regional or provincial level:

Atlantic Canada

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Narrative Research August 22, 2019 PDF 43 30 10 - 15 - 2 ±2.5 pp 1,500 Telephone 13
Narrative Research May 24, 2019 PDF 39 36 9 - 14 - 2 ±2.5 pp 1,500 Telephone 3

Newfoundland and Labrador

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
MQO Research July 31, 2019 PDF 46 38 11 - 2 2 1 ±4.9 pp 400 Telephone 8
MQO Research May 4, 2019 PDF 49 37 11 - 3 0 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 12
MQO Research January 28, 2019 PDF 56 35 6 - 1 1 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 21

Prince Edward Island

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
MQO Research August 6, 2019 HTML 40 34 4 - 21 1 ±5.7 pp 400 Telephone 6
MQO Research April 16, 2019 PDF 40 32 8 - 18 1 ±4 pp 400 Telephone 8
MQO Research January 27, 2019 [1] 52 30 7 - 10 ±4 pp 400 Telephone 22

Nova Scotia

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
MQO Research August 27, 2019 PDF 44 31 13 - 9 1 ±4.9 pp 400 Telephone 13
MQO Research May 13, 2019 PDF 42 35 11 - 10 0 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 7
MQO Research February 10, 2019 PDF 50 30 12 - 7 1 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 20

New Brunswick

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
MQO Research August 14, 2019 PDF 41 40 6 - 9 4 ±4.9 pp 400 Telephone 1
MQO Research May 6, 2019 PDF 36 39 7 - 16 1 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 3
MQO Research February 10, 2019 PDF 44 39 4 - 10 3 ±4 pp 600 Telephone 5

Central Canada

Quebec

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
2019 election October 21, 2019 HTML 34.2 16.0 10.7 32.5 4.4 1.5 1.7
Leger October 15, 2019 PDF 31 16 14 31 6 2 - ±1.79 3000 Online 0
Forum Research October 12, 2019 PDF 33 15 10 31 7 2 2 ±3 pp 1001 IVR 2
Leger October 10, 2019 PDF 31 16 13 29 7 3 1 - 1014 Online 2
Mainstreet Research October 6, 2019 HTML 35 17 11 27 7 3 - ±3.75 pp 685 IVR 8
Mainstreet Research September 30, 2019 HTML 37 18 10 22 9 3 - ±3.7 pp 694 IVR 15
Nanos Research September 30, 2019 PDF 35.3 17.0 13.3 22.0 10.1 1.8 0.6 ±3.6 pp 828 telephone 13.3
Leger September 17, 2019 [2] 36 21 7 22 10 3 1 ±3.9 pp 837 Online 14
Mainstreet Research September 13, 2019 HTML 33.0 24.8 7.9 18.6 9.5 - - unknown unknown IVR 8.2
Leger August 29, 2019 PDF 34 23 7 20 11 4 1 ±3.39 pp 837 Online 11
Forum Research August 28, 2019 HTML 37 21 8 18 9 4 ±3 pp 1219 IVR 16
Forum Research July 24, 2019 PDF 30 28 9 15 10 4 3 ±3 pp 977 IVR 2
Forum Research June 12, 2019 PDF 32 25 9 18 10 4 2 ±3 pp 1,471 IVR 7
Leger March 11, 2019 HTML 35 26 7 17 9 4 ±3.08 pp 1,014 Online 9
Leger January 28, 2019 PDF 39 21 8 21 5 6 ±3.09 pp 1,007 Online 18
CROP June 19, 2018 PDF 42 27 10 12 8 0 — 1,000 Online 15
Leger August 24, 2017 PDF 43 16 19 16 6 2 ±3 pp 1,002 Online 27

Ontario

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Campaign Research September 19, 2019 HTML 35 39 12 - 10 2 1 ±2.17 pp 2035 Online/Telephone 4
Angus Reid September 18, 2019 PDF 36 35 15 - 9 5 - - 722 online 1
EKOS September 5, 2019 PDF 40.8 29.9 10.9 - 11.9 4.8 1.8 ±2.0 pp 2393 IVR 10.9
EKOS August 28, 2019 Twitter 46.7 29.2 7.6 - 9.4 5.7 1.3 ±4.97 pp 389 IVR 17.5
EKOS August 27, 2019 Twitter 44 30 10 - 10 4 2 ±1.9 pp 2601 IVR 14
EKOS August 19, 2019 Twitter 42.9 29.9 8.6 - 13.7 2.5 2.5 ±5.39 pp 301 IVR 13
Corbett Communications August 13, 2019 PDF 39 31 14 - 12 4 1 ±3 pp 1099 Online 8
EKOS August 9, 2019 Twitter 40.3 28.9 11.9 - 12.2 5.2 1.5 ±4.90 pp 400 IVR 11.4
EKOS July 26, 2019 Twitter 33.8 35.8 9.5 - 13.2 4.5 3.2 ±4.89 pp 402 IVR 2
Corbett Communications July 10, 2019 PDF 38 33 14 - 13 1 0 ±3 pp 481 Online 5
Innovative Research April 16, 2019 PDF 40 33 14 - 9 - 4 945 Online 7
Innovative Research April 10, 2019 PDF 41 34 13 - 9 - 4 773 Online 7
Innovative Research April 1, 2019 PDF 39 33 18 - 7 - 3 ±4 pp 605 Telephone 6
Toronto
Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Forum Research September 26, 2019 PDF 50 26 10 - 10 3 1 ±3 pp 1,059 IVR 24
Forum Research July 6, 2019 PDF 46 26 12 - 10 4 2 ±3 pp 1,143 IVR 20

Western Canada

Manitoba

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Probe Research September 26, 2019 PDF 27 41 19 - 9 3 1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone 14
Probe Research June 17, 2019 PDF 24 43 17 - 13 2 1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone 19
Probe Research March 24, 2019 PDF 31 42 17 - 7 3 1 ±3.1 pp 1,000 telephone 11
Probe Research December 6, 2018 PDF 34 42 16 - 5 2 1 ±2.9 pp 1,105 telephone 8

Saskatchewan

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
U of Saskatchewan September 2019 HTML 5 41 11 - 8 1 - ±4.9 pp 400 telephone 30

Alberta

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Lethbridge College October 10, 2019 PDF 17.9 64.0 9.7 - 4.1 1.9 2.4 ±3.17 pp 953 telephone 46.1
Lethbridge College February 5, 2019 PDF 12.9 71.4 9.3 - 1.9 2.1 2.3 ±3.0 pp 1,055 telephone 58.5

British Columbia

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2] 		Sample
size[3] 		Polling method[4] Lead
Insights West October 16, 2019 HTML 20 27 23 - 11 - 2 ±2.4 pp 1670 Online 4
Insights West September 23, 2019 HTML 19 29 14 - 14 - 3 ±3.3 pp 867 Online 10
Insights West September 10, 2019 HTML 17 29 14 - 13 - 4 ±3.4 pp 869 Online 12

Leadership polls

Aside from conducting the usual opinion surveys on general party preferences, polling firms also survey public opinion on who would make the best Prime Minister:

February 2019–October 2019

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Yves-François Blanchet Elizabeth May Maxime Bernier Unsure Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research September 6, 2019 PDF 33.6 22.7 7.4 1.4 8.1 2.4 24.4 ±3.1 pp 10.9
Nanos Research August 30, 2019 PDF 32.2 23.2 7.2 1.3 8.3 2.8 25.1 ±3.1 pp 9.0
Nanos Research August 23, 2019 PDF 30.9 25.1 6.7 1.4 8.7 2.6 24.6 ±3.1 pp 5.8
Nanos Research August 16, 2019 PDF 31.8 23.9 7.5 1.7 8.4 2.5 24.1 ±3.1 pp 7.9
Nanos Research August 9, 2019 PDF 31.4 25 7 1.8 8.5 1.9 24.3 ±3.1 pp 6.4
Nanos Research August 2, 2019 PDF 33.8 24.4 6.8 1.8 9.2 1.6 22.3 ±3.1 pp 9.4
Forum Research July 28, 2019 PDF 28 28 7 - 14 - 23 ±3 pp 0
Nanos Research July 26, 2019 PDF 32.5 24.1 7.7 2.5 9.1 1.6 22.4 ±3.1 pp 8.4
Leger July 23, 2019 PDF 23 24 7 9 4 20 ±2.5 pp 1
Nanos Research July 19, 2019 PDF 32.8 24.0 8.0 2.3 8.8 1.8 22.3 ±3.1 pp 8.8
Abacus Data July 17, 2019 HTML 36 31 13 14 6 ±2.6 pp 5
Ipsos July 15, 2019 HTML 32 36 13 2 17 ±3.5 pp 4
Campaign Research July 12, 2019 HTML 24 20 7 1 9 3 21 ±2.3 pp 4
Nanos Research July 12, 2019 PDF 32.9 23.1 8.9 1.8 7.9 2.2 23.2 ±3.1 pp 9.8
Nanos Research June 21, 2019 PDF 27.9 24.0 9.7 1.6 7.7 2.1 27.0 ±3.1 pp 2.9
Nanos Research June 14, 2019 PDF 27.0 24.9 9.9 1.5 9.4 1.8 25.6 ±2.3 pp 2.1
Campaign Research June 9, 2019 HTML 24 24 7 1 9 4 17 ±2.6 pp 0
Abacus Data June 1, 2019 HTML 33 30 12 19 6 ±2.6 pp 3
Nanos Research May 31, 2019 PDF 26.5 26.7 8.9 1.7 9.6 1.6 24.9 ±3.1 pp 0.2
Nanos Research May 17, 2019 PDF 27.9 28.6 6.8 1.5 10.0 1.8 23.3 ±3.1 pp 0.8
Abacus Data May 3, 2019 HTML 34 33 14 14 6 ±1.5 pp 1
Leger April 22, 2019 PDF 20 25 7 8 3 21 ±2.5 pp 5
Leger March 20, 2019 PDF 24 25 8 7 4 19 ±2.51 pp 1
Nanos Research March 15, 2019 PDF 30.3 27.3 8.9 1.7 7.2 2.8 21.8 ±3.1 pp 3.0
Abacus Data March 10, 2019 HTML 39 31 10 13 7 ±3.3 pp 8
Campaign Research March 10, 2019 HTML 23 24 7 1 8 19 ±2.5 pp 1
Abacus Data March 6, 2019 HTML 35 33 13 13 7 ±3.3 pp (final) 2
Nanos Research March 1, 2019 PDF 35.2 25.0 6.2 1.8 7.3 2.1 22.5 ±3.1 pp 10.2
Nanos Research February 15, 2019 PDF 35.7 23.4 5.3 1.6 7.7 2.7 22.1 ±3.1 pp 12.3
Campaign Research February 11, 2019 HTML 28 25 4 6 1 17 ±2.5 pp 3
Nanos Research February 8, 2019 PDF 35.5 24.9 5.9 1.4 6.4 3.8 22.1 ±3.1 pp 10.6

September 2018–February 2019

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Mario Beaulieu Elizabeth May Maxime Bernier Unsure Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research February 1, 2019 PDF 34.1 24.9 6.8 1.2 6.7 5.2 21.2 ±3.1 pp 9.2
Nanos Research January 25, 2019 PDF 33.5 26.1 7.5 1.2 6.7 4.9 20.1 ±3.1 pp 7.4
Nanos Research January 18, 2019 PDF 34.6 24.8 7.5 1.1 6.7 4.4 20.9 ±3.1 pp 9.8
Nanos Research January 11, 2019 PDF 36.4 23.9 6.8 1.3 6.2 4.5 20.9 ±3.1 pp 12.5
Nanos Research January 4, 2019 PDF 39.3 23.5 6.5 1.2 5.4 3.9 20.1 ±3.1 pp 15.8
Nanos Research December 28, 2018 PDF 39.1 23.7 5.0 1.0 5.7 4.2 21.3 ±3.1 pp 15.4
Nanos Research December 21, 2018 PDF 38.3 24.8 5.0 0.9 5.8 4.1 21.1 ±3.1 pp 13.5
Abacus Data December 18, 2018 HTML 45 29 10 10 5 ±2.5 pp 16
Angus Reid December 18, 2018 HTML 27 33 6 7 26 ±2.5 pp 6
Nanos Research December 14, 2018 PDF 37.4 25.6 6.3 0.7 5.4 2.6 22.0 ±3.1 pp 11.8
Campaign Research December 13, 2018 HTML 32 22 5 1 7 17 ±2.5 pp 10
Nanos Research December 7, 2018 PDF 35.8 25.0 5.6 0.6 6.0 2.1 25.0 ±3.1 pp 10.8
Nanos Research November 30, 2018 PDF 37.5 23.4 5.7 0.6 5.5 2.5 24.9 ±3.1 pp 14.1
Forum Research November 29, 2018 PDF 33 32 6 8 22 ±3 pp 1
Nanos Research November 23, 2018 PDF 38.2 21.9 5.8 0.9 5.7 2.3 25.2 ±3.1 pp 16.3
Leger November 20, 2018 PDF 33 22 5 6 5 ±2.51 pp 11
Nanos Research November 16, 2018 PDF 39.5 20.2 7.7 0.7 5.5 2.2 24.3 ±3.1 pp 19.3
Campaign Research November 9, 2018 HTML 32 22 6 6 17 ±2.5 pp 10
Nanos Research November 9, 2018 PDF 41.7 20.0 8.6 1.0 5.5 2.6 20.6 ±3.1 pp 21.7
Nanos Research November 2, 2018 PDF 41.2 20.3 8.2 1.2 6.3 2.4 20.4 ±3.1 pp 20.9
Nanos Research October 26, 2018 PDF 40.8 21.3 8.0 1.6 5.5 2.7 20.0 ±3.1 pp 19.5
Nanos Research October 19, 2018 PDF 37.9 22.9 7.5 1.6 6.2 2.5 21.4 ±3.1 pp 15.0
Nanos Research October 12, 2018 PDF 39.1 23.4 7.1 1.0 5.5 3.1 20.9 ±3.1 pp 15.7
Innovative Research October 1, 2018 HTML 47 29 9 2 8 n/a 18
Pollara September 20, 2018 PDF 39 27 8 5 21 ±3.1 pp 12

August–September 2018

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Mario Beaulieu Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research September 28, 2018 PDF 41.4 24.7 7.8 0.5 5.5 ±3.1 pp 16.7
Nanos Research September 21, 2018 PDF 43.1 25.0 7.5 0.8 5.6 ±3.1 pp 18.1
Pollara September 20, 2018 HTML 39 27 8 — 5 ±3.1 pp 12
Campaign Research September 14, 2018 HTML 32 22 5 5 ±2.5 pp 10
Nanos Research August 31, 2018 PDF 42.2 24.3 6.8 1.0 6.4 ±3.1 pp 17.9
Nanos Research August 24, 2018 PDF 40.1 25.4 7.7 1.3 5.2 ±3.1 pp 14.7
Nanos Research August 17, 2018 PDF 39.6 25.2 8.2 1.2 4.6 ±3.1 pp 14.4

October 2017–July 2018

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research July 27, 2018 PDF 40.4 24.5 6.5 1.2 5.8 ±3.1 pp 15.9
Nanos Research July 20, 2018 PDF 40.5 25.2 6.3 1.3 5.9 ±3.1 pp 15.3
Nanos Research July 6, 2018 PDF 42.6 24.4 7.1 0.9 6.0 ±3.1 pp 18.2
Nanos Research June 22, 2018 PDF 41.3 24.8 8.2 1.1 4.9 ±3.1 pp 16.5
Nanos Research June 15, 2018 PDF 38.7 25.4 8.8 0.8 4.3 ±3.1 pp 13.3
Angus Reid June 14, 2018 PDF 35 22 7 – 6 ±3.1 pp 13
Nanos Research June 1, 2018 PDF 34.3 25.6 10.0 1.2 5.7 ±3.1 pp 8.7
Nanos Research May 25, 2018 PDF 36.0 25.2 9.3 1.3 6.4 ±3.1 pp 10.8
Nanos Research May 18, 2018 PDF 39.2 22.4 8.1 1.3 6.8 ±3.1 pp 16.8
Nanos Research May 11, 2018 PDF 39.6 20.9 8.1 0.9 7.7 ±3.1 pp 18.7
Forum Research April 20, 2018 PDF 24 25 8 3 12 ±2 pp 1
Nanos Research March 23, 2018 PDF 38.5 26.5 8.9 1.9 4.9 ±3.1 pp 12.0
Nanos Research March 16, 2018 PDF 37.5 25.9 9.0 2.4 5.7 ±3.1 pp 11.6
Angus Reid March 15, 2018 PDF 26 22 7 – – ±2 pp 4
Nanos Research March 9, 2018 PDF 39.2 23.2 9.4 2.6 5.9 ±3.1 pp 16.0
Nanos Research March 2, 2018 PDF 40.4 22.8 8.6 1.8 6.6 ±3.1 pp 17.6
Nanos Research February 23, 2018 PDF 40.4 22.1 9.5 1.9 5.6 ±3.1 pp 18.3
Nanos Research February 16, 2018 PDF 41.0 21.9 9.3 1.5 5.4 ±3.1 pp 20.1
Campaign Research February 10, 2018 HTML 35 15 7 2 5 ±2.1 pp 20
Nanos Research January 26, 2018 PDF 40.8 22.1 8.3 2.3 5.8 ±3.1 pp 18.7
Nanos Research January 12, 2018 PDF 42.7 22.3 8.1 1.8 5.2 ±3.1 pp 20.4
Nanos Research January 5, 2018 PDF 45.6 20.3 9.0 1.4 4.1 ±3.1 pp 25.3
Nanos Research December 29, 2017 PDF 46.9 21.5 9.1 1.0 3.9 ±3.1 pp 25.4
Nanos Research December 22, 2017 PDF 48.3 22.0 7.9 0.8 4.5 ±3.1 pp 26.3
Nanos Research December 15, 2017 PDF 46.8 21.9 8.2 1.0 5.9 ±3.1 pp 24.9
Forum Research December 14, 2017 PDF 30 21 9 5 10 ±3.1 pp 9
Nanos Research December 8, 2017 PDF 45.4 23.5 8.0 1.3 6.4 ±3.1 pp 21.9
Nanos Research December 1, 2017 PDF 45.6 22.8 6.6 2.0 6.1 ±3.1 pp 22.8
Nanos Research November 24, 2017 PDF 44.1 22.8 7.2 1.6 5.3 ±3.1 pp 21.3
Nanos Research November 17, 2017 PDF 44.8 22.4 7.7 1.6 4.8 ±3.1 pp 22.4
Nanos Research November 10, 2017 PDF 45.0 21.1 8.8 1.4 5.2 ±3.1 pp 23.9
Campaign Research November 9, 2017 PDF 35 15 7 5 5 ±2.2 pp 20
Nanos Research November 3, 2017 PDF 43.8 21.0 8.5 1.9 5.4 ±3.1 pp 22.8
Nanos Research October 27, 2017 PDF 44.3 20.8 9.2 2.3 5.5 ±3.1 pp 23.5
Campaign Research October 11, 2017 PDF 36 14 6 1 5 ±2.2 pp 22

October 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh/
Thomas Mulcair 		Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research October 20, 2017 PDF 42.2 22.4 9.5 2.0 5.2 ±3.1 pp 19.8
Nanos Research October 13, 2017 PDF 41.9 22.5 8.7 1.6 5.3 ±3.1 pp 19.4
Nanos Research October 6, 2017 PDF 43.9 21.7 9.3 1.2 4.0 ±3.1 pp 22.2

June–September 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research September 29, 2017 PDF 43.9 20.3 9.7 1.3 4.0 ±3.1 pp 23.6
Nanos Research September 22, 2017 PDF 45.3 21.2 9.4 1.5 4.3 ±3.1 pp 24.1
Nanos Research September 15, 2017 PDF 46.3 19.7 10.1 1.5 4.1 ±3.1 pp 26.6
Forum Research September 14, 2017 PDF 34 20 12 4 5 ±3 pp 14
Campaign Research September 11, 2017 HTML 42 13 8 2 6 ±2.3 pp 29
Nanos Research September 8, 2017 PDF 47.8 19.7 9.7 1.3 3.7 ±3.1 pp 28.1
Nanos Research September 1, 2017 PDF 46.2 21.7 9.8 1.6 4.0 ±3.1 pp 24.5
Nanos Research August 25, 2017 PDF 48.0 20.4 9.0 1.3 4.3 ±3.1 pp 27.6
Nanos Research August 18, 2017 PDF 47.5 21.6 8.4 1.1 4.4 ±3.1 pp 25.9
Forum Research August 17, 2017 PDF 39 18 10 2 8 ±3 pp 21
Nanos Research August 11, 2017 PDF 47.1 21.3 9.2 1.4 4.9 ±3.1 pp 25.8
Nanos Research August 4, 2017 PDF 46.1 21.8 9.8 1.7 5.1 ±3.1 pp 24.3
Nanos Research July 28, 2017 PDF 44.0 21.5 9.7 1.6 6.0 ±3.1 pp 22.5
Nanos Research July 21, 2017 PDF 45.4 20.8 10.1 1.4 5.5 ±3.1 pp 24.6
Nanos Research July 14, 2017 PDF 43.9 21.9 9.8 1.4 5.5 ±3.1 pp 22.0
Campaign Research July 10, 2017 HTML 38 17 8 1 4 ±2 pp 21
Nanos Research July 7, 2017 PDF 45.6 21.4 8.1 0.7 5.4 ±3.1 pp 24.2
Nanos Research June 30, 2017 PDF 46.9 21.5 7.9 1.1 4.0 ±3.1 pp 25.4
Nanos Research June 23, 2017 PDF 46.3 21.2 8.4 1.0 4.5 ±3.1 pp 25.1
Angus Reid June 12, 2017 HTML 37 19 10 ±2 pp 18
Forum Research June 8, 2017 PDF 39 20 9 3 8 ±3 pp 19

June 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose/
Andrew Scheer 		Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research June 16, 2017 PDF 45.8 19.8 8.5 1.2 5.3 ±3.1 pp 26.0
Nanos Research June 9, 2017 PDF 43.6 19.2 9.1 1.3 5.3 ±3.1 pp 24.4
Nanos Research June 2, 2017 PDF 45.9 18.5 8.9 1.5 5.1 ±3.1 pp 27.4

April–May 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research May 26, 2017 PDF 45.7 18.4 9.1 0.2 4.9 ±3.1 pp 27.3
Nanos Research May 19, 2017 PDF 46.3 18.4 9.2 1.9 5.2 ±3.1 pp 27.9
Nanos Research May 12, 2017 PDF 47.8 19.4 10.3 2.0 5.4 ±3.1 pp 28.4
Nanos Research May 5, 2017 PDF 46.9 18.7 10.7 2.0 5.4 ±3.1 pp 28.2
Nanos Research April 28, 2017 PDF 48.2 18.4 9.4 1.6 5.4 ±3.1 pp 29.8
Forum Research April 24, 2017 PDF 32 12 10 2 8 ±3 pp 20
Nanos Research April 21, 2017 PDF 47.8 18.6 9.2 0.2 5.1 ±3.1 pp 29.2
Nanos Research April 13, 2017 PDF 46.5 19.4 8.7 1.7 5.3 ±3.1 pp 27.1

March–April 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin/
Martine Ouellet 		Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research April 7, 2017 PDF 47.0 19.3 10.5 1.3 4.6 ±3.1 pp 27.7
Nanos Research March 31, 2017 PDF 47.2 18.1 11.6 1.5 4.9 ±3.1 pp 29.1
Nanos Research March 24, 2017 PDF 48.7 18.1 10.7 0.9 5.0 ±3.1 pp 30.6

December 2015–March 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research March 17, 2017 PDF 49.7 17.3 10.6 0.8 4.3 ±3.1 pp 32.4
Nanos Research March 10, 2017 PDF 48.7 17.0 10.8 0.8 4.9 ±3.1 pp 31.7
Nanos Research March 3, 2017 PDF 47.0 17.4 10.2 0.9 5.2 ±3.1 pp 29.6
Nanos Research February 24, 2017 PDF 46.3 18.3 9.9 0.9 4.9 ±3.1 pp 28.0
Nanos Research February 17, 2017 PDF 46.1 17.3 10.9 1.2 4.9 ±3.1 pp 28.8
Nanos Research February 10, 2017 PDF 46.4 19.1 9.6 1.0 4.9 ±3.1 pp 27.3
Campaign Research February 6, 2017 HTML 31 14 11 ±3 pp 17
Nanos Research February 3, 2017 PDF 45.4 20.0 10.2 1.2 5.5 ±3.1 pp 25.4
Nanos Research January 27, 2017 PDF 46.7 19.9 10.7 1.1 4.7 ±3.1 pp 26.8
Forum Research January 21, 2017 PDF 38 11 9 2 6 ±3 pp 27
Nanos Research January 20, 2017 PDF 46.6 20.3 10.2 0.9 5.1 ±3.1 pp 26.3
Nanos Research January 13, 2017 PDF 46.7 18.8 11.1 0.8 5.1 ±3.1 pp 27.9
Nanos Research January 6, 2017 PDF 49.3 18.1 10.0 0.5 4.0 ±3.1 pp 31.2
Nanos Research December 30, 2016 PDF 49.0 17.7 9.6 0.8 4.7 ±3.1 pp 31.3
Nanos Research December 23, 2016 PDF 50.6 17.1 8.8 0.9 4.6 ±3.1 pp 33.5
Nanos Research December 9, 2016 PDF 54.1 15.8 7.4 1.0 5.4 ±3.1 pp 38.3
Nanos Research December 2, 2016 PDF 54.0 15.5 8.5 1.1 5.3 ±3.1 pp 38.5
Forum Research December 7, 2016 PDF 40 14 12 2 6 ±3 pp 26
Nanos Research November 25, 2016 PDF 54.2 15.7 8.7 0.7 5.5 ±3.1 pp 38.5
Nanos Research November 18, 2016 PDF 52.2 17.1 8.3 0.5 5.3 ±3.1 pp 35.1
Nanos Research November 11, 2016 PDF 50.3 16.7 8.7 0.7 5.5 ±3.1 pp 33.6
Nanos Research November 4, 2016 PDF 49.5 16.2 8.3 0.5 5.6 ±3.1 pp 33.3
Nanos Research October 28, 2016 PDF 49.6 16.0 8.2 0.5 5.7 ±3.1 pp 33.6
Nanos Research October 21, 2016 PDF 50.4 14.6 8.4 0.6 6.1 ±3.1 pp 35.8
Nanos Research October 14, 2016 PDF 52.2 14.7 8.6 0.7 5.4 ±3.1 pp 37.6
Nanos Research October 7, 2016 PDF 55.9 14.5 7.7 0.6 4.5 ±3.1 pp 41.4
Nanos Research September 30, 2016 PDF 56.0 14.1 7.4 0.6 4.4 ±3.1 pp 41.9
Nanos Research September 23, 2016 PDF 55.9 15.0 7.9 1.1 3.8 ±3.1 pp 40.9
Forum Research September 21, 2016 PDF 44 13 8 2 7 ±3 pp 31
Nanos Research September 16, 2016 PDF 53.9 15.6 8.3 1.3 3.7 ±3.1 pp 38.3
Nanos Research September 9, 2016 PDF 53.7 16.7 8.0 1.5 3.8 ±3.1 pp 37.0
Forum Research September 7, 2016 PDF 46 13 8 1 7 ±3 pp 33
Nanos Research September 2, 2016 PDF 54.1 16.5 7.9 1.8 3.6 ±3.1 pp 37.6
Nanos Research August 26, 2016 PDF 54.4 16.7 9.3 1.5 3.6 ±3.1 pp 37.7
Nanos Research August 19, 2016 PDF 56.3 16.3 9.0 1.2 3.3 ±3.1 pp 40.0
Nanos Research August 12, 2016 PDF 55.6 14.5 9.2 1.3 4.3 ±3.1 pp 41.1
Forum Research August 6, 2016 PDF 50 12 8 1 7 ±3.0 pp 38
Nanos Research August 5, 2016 PDF 55.4 15.1 9.2 1.0 4.6 ±3.1 pp 40.3
Nanos Research July 29, 2016 PDF 54.1 14.9 9.2 0.6 4.9 ±3.1 pp 39.2
Nanos Research July 22, 2016 PDF 52.3 15.9 9.2 0.5 4.9 ±3.1 pp 36.4
Nanos Research July 15, 2016 PDF 52.7 17.0 9.0 0.2 4.4 ±3.1 pp 35.7
Nanos Research July 8, 2016 PDF 52.3 16.7 9.8 0.7 4.1 ±3.1 pp 35.6
Forum Research July 5, 2016 PDF 49 13 9 1 7 ±2 pp 36
Nanos Research June 30, 2016 PDF 52.5 17.6 8.5 1.3 4.9 ±3.1 pp 34.9
Nanos Research June 24, 2016 PDF 53.4 15.9 8.8 1.5 5.2 ±3.1 pp 37.5
Nanos Research June 17, 2016 PDF 53.6 15.1 8.3 1.4 5.0 ±3.1 pp 38.5
Nanos Research June 10, 2016 PDF 52.6 15.8 8.0 1.3 5.0 ±3.1 pp 36.8
Forum Research June 7, 2016 PDF 45 11 9 2 6 ±2 pp 34
Nanos Research June 3, 2016 PDF 53.5 14.5 8.6 1.0 4.3 ±3.1 pp 39
Nanos Research May 27, 2016 PDF 53.7 15.5 8.2 1.0 3.8 ±3.1 pp 38.2
Nanos Research May 20, 2016 PDF 53.8 15.6 9.0 1.2 3.6 ±3.1 pp 38.2
Nanos Research May 13, 2016 PDF 53.0 15.8 10.1 1.3 3.4 ±3.1 pp 37.2
Forum Research May 11, 2016 PDF 47 13 10 2 6 ±3 pp 34
Nanos Research May 6, 2016 PDF 51.9 15.3 10.3 1.2 5.3 ±3.1 pp 36.6
Nanos Research April 29, 2016 PDF 51.6 15.2 10.7 0.8 5.8 ±3.1 pp 36.4
Nanos Research April 22, 2016 PDF 50.4 16.7 10.6 0.7 5.8 ±3.1 pp 33.7
Nanos Research April 15, 2016 PDF 51.1 16.6 9.7 0.5 6.0 ±3.1 pp 34.5
Nanos Research April 8, 2016 PDF 52.3 16.9 10.6 0.5 4.2 ±3.1 pp 35.4
Forum Research April 5, 2016 PDF 47 11 10 1 7 ±3 pp 36
Nanos Research April 1, 2016 PDF 51.3 17.5 11.6 0.8 3.3 ±3.1 pp 33.8
Innovative Research March 30, 2016 PDF 60.0 21.0 12.0 1.0 6.0 n/a 39.0
Nanos Research March 24, 2016 PDF 51.4 17.0 11.6 1.1 3.9 ±3.1 pp 34.4
Nanos Research March 18, 2016 PDF 52.8 14.9 12.7 0.6 4.4 ±3.1 pp 37.9
Forum Research March 15, 2016 PDF 43 13 10 1 5 ±2 pp 30
Nanos Research March 11, 2016 PDF 52.7 14.6 12.8 0.7 4.7 ±3.1 pp 38.1
Nanos Research March 4, 2016 PDF 53.7 14.2 11.3 0.9 5.3 ±3.1 pp 39.5
Nanos Research February 26, 2016 PDF 53.5 13.9 10.9 0.9 5.0 ±3.1 pp 39.6
Nanos Research February 19, 2016 PDF 51.4 14.9 11.4 1.0 4.8 ±3.1 pp 36.5
Forum Research February 17, 2016 PDF 47 12 8 1 7 ±3 pp 35
Nanos Research February 12, 2016 PDF 51.4 15.1 10.7 1.0 4.4 ±3.1 pp 36.3
Leger February 9, 2016 PDF 40 9 10 4 ±2.1 pp 30
Nanos Research February 5, 2016 PDF 51.0 14.8 12.2 0.9 4.1 ±3.1 pp 36.2
Nanos Research January 29, 2016 PDF 50.0 14.9 13.0 0.7 4.4 ±3.1 pp 35.1
Nanos Research January 22, 2016 PDF 52.2 14.6 11.5 0.9 3.5 ±3.1 pp 37.6
Nanos Research January 15, 2016 PDF 53.5 13.7 10.6 1.0 4.5 ±3.1 pp 39.8
Nanos Research January 8, 2016 PDF 53.2 13.2 10.3 1.1 4.2 ±3.1 pp 40.0
Nanos Research January 2, 2016 PDF 52.6 12.1 11.6 1.2 4.8 ±3.1 pp 40.5
Nanos Research December 25, 2015 PDF 53.1 11.3 12.7 1.2 5.1 ±3.1 pp 40.4
Nanos Research December 18, 2015 PDF 50.2 12.9 13.0 1.3 5.1 ±3.1 pp 37.2
Nanos Research December 11, 2015 PDF 51.5 13.7 12.8 1.2 5.0 ±3.1 pp 37.8
Nanos Research December 4, 2015 PDF 53.7 13.7 12.0 1.4 4.2 ±3.1 pp 40.0

November 2015

Polling firm Last date
of polling 		Link Justin Trudeau Stephen Harper/
Rona Ambrose 		Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin Elizabeth May Margin
of error[1] 		Lead
Nanos Research November 27, 2015 PDF 50.9 16.3 12.3 1.6 4.8 ±3.1 pp 34.6
Nanos Research November 20, 2015 PDF 53.3 17.2 11.6 1.2 4.6 ±3.1 pp 36.1
Nanos Research November 13, 2015 PDF 50.9 18.4 13.0 1.3 5.0 ±3.1 pp 32.5

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_Canadian_federal_election&oldid=990993012"