Jump to content

Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monkbot (talk | contribs) at 03:23, 6 December 2020 (Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 3 templates: del empty params (4×); hyphenate params (1×);). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co.
Argued October 10–11, 1973
Decided November 19, 1973
Full case nameEspinoza, et vir v. Farah Manufacturing Company
Citations414 U.S. 86 (more)
94 S. Ct. 334; 38 L. Ed. 2d 287
Holding
An employer's refusal to hire a person because he is not a United States citizen does not constitute employment discrimination on the basis of “national origin” in violation of §703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[1]
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
MajorityMarshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
DissentDouglas

Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., 414 U.S. 86 (1973), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an employer's refusal to hire a person because he is not a United States citizen does not constitute employment discrimination on the basis of “national origin” in violation of §703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[1]

Espinoza, a Mexican national admitted to residence in the United States and married to a U.S. national, brought suit after exhausting her administrative remedies with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that Farah Mfg. Company's refusal to hire her in its San Antonio, Texas division because of her Mexican citizenship violated §703 of the Civil Rights Act, which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

The District Court granted Espinoza's motion for summary judgment, relying primarily on an EEOC guideline providing that a lawful alien resident may not be discriminated against on the basis of citizenship. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Civil Rights Act of 1964". Archived from the original on 2010-10-21. Retrieved 2008-10-06.

Further reading