Ada (programming language)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Green logo on horizon with Ada letters and slogan
ParadigmMulti-paradigm: structured, imperative, object-oriented, aspect-oriented,[1] concurrent, array, distributed, generic, procedural, meta
Designed by
  • MIL-STD-1815, Ada 83: Jean Ichbiah
  • Ada 95: Tucker Taft
  • Ada 2005: Tucker Taft
  • Ada 2012: Tucker Taft
First appearedFebruary 1980; 43 years ago (1980-02)
Stable release
Ada 2012 TC1[2][3]
Typing disciplinestatic, strong, safe, nominal
OSMulti- or cross-platform
Filename extensions.adb, .ads
Major implementations
AdaCore GNAT,[4]
Green Hills Software Optimising Ada 95 compiler,
PTC ApexAda and ObjectAda,[5]
MapuSoft Ada-C/C++ changer,[6] formerly known as "AdaMagic with C Intermediate",[7]
DDC-I Score
SPARK, Ravenscar profile
Influenced by
ALGOL 68, Pascal, Simula 67,[8] C++ (Ada 95), Smalltalk (Ada 95), Modula-2 (Ada 95) Java (Ada 2005), Eiffel (Ada 2012)
C++, Chapel,[9] Drago,[10] D, Eiffel, Griffin,[11] Java, Nim, ParaSail, PL/SQL, PL/pgSQL, Python, Ruby, Seed7, SPARforte,[12] Sparkel, SQL/PSM, VHDL

Ada is a structured, statically typed, imperative, and object-oriented high-level programming language, inspired by Pascal and other languages. It has built-in language support for design by contract (DbC), extremely strong typing, explicit concurrency, tasks, synchronous message passing, protected objects, and non-determinism. Ada improves code safety and maintainability by using the compiler to find errors in favor of runtime errors. Ada is an international technical standard, jointly defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). As of 2020, the standard, called Ada 2012 informally,[13] is ISO/IEC 8652:2012.[14]

Ada was originally designed by a team led by French computer scientist Jean Ichbiah of Honeywell under contract to the United States Department of Defense (DoD) from 1977 to 1983 to supersede over 450 programming languages used by the DoD at that time.[15] Ada was named after Ada Lovelace (1815–1852), who has been credited as the first computer programmer.[16]


Ada was originally designed for embedded and real-time systems. The Ada 95 revision, designed by S. Tucker Taft of Intermetrics between 1992 and 1995, improved support for systems, numerical, financial, and object-oriented programming (OOP).

Features of Ada include: strong typing, modular programming mechanisms (packages), run-time checking, parallel processing (tasks, synchronous message passing, protected objects, and nondeterministic select statements), exception handling, and generics. Ada 95 added support for object-oriented programming, including dynamic dispatch.

The syntax of Ada minimizes choices of ways to perform basic operations, and prefers English keywords (such as "or else" and "and then") to symbols (such as "||" and "&&"). Ada uses the basic arithmetical operators "+", "-", "*", and "/", but avoids using other symbols. Code blocks are delimited by words such as "declare", "begin", and "end", where the "end" (in most cases) is followed by the identifier of the block it closes (e.g., if ... end if, loop ... end loop). In the case of conditional blocks this avoids a dangling else that could pair with the wrong nested if-expression in other languages like C or Java.

Ada is designed for developing very large software systems. Ada packages can be compiled separately. Ada package specifications (the package interface) can also be compiled separately without the implementation to check for consistency. This makes it possible to detect problems early during the design phase, before implementation starts.

A large number of compile-time checks are supported to help avoid bugs that would not be detectable until run-time in some other languages or would require explicit checks to be added to the source code. For example, the syntax requires explicitly named closing of blocks to prevent errors due to mismatched end tokens. The adherence to strong typing allows detecting many common software errors (wrong parameters, range violations, invalid references, mismatched types, etc.) either during compile-time, or otherwise during run-time. As concurrency is part of the language specification, the compiler can in some cases detect potential deadlocks.[17] Compilers also commonly check for misspelled identifiers, visibility of packages, redundant declarations, etc. and can provide warnings and useful suggestions on how to fix the error.

Ada also supports run-time checks to protect against access to unallocated memory, buffer overflow errors, range violations, off-by-one errors, array access errors, and other detectable bugs. These checks can be disabled in the interest of runtime efficiency, but can often be compiled efficiently. It also includes facilities to help program verification. For these reasons, Ada is widely used in critical systems, where any anomaly might lead to very serious consequences, e.g., accidental death, injury or severe financial loss. Examples of systems where Ada is used include avionics, air traffic control, railways, banking, military and space technology.[18][19]

Ada's dynamic memory management is high-level and type-safe. Ada has no generic or untyped pointers; nor does it implicitly declare any pointer type. Instead, all dynamic memory allocation and deallocation must occur via explicitly declared access types. Each access type has an associated storage pool that handles the low-level details of memory management; the programmer can either use the default storage pool or define new ones (this is particularly relevant for Non-Uniform Memory Access). It is even possible to declare several different access types that all designate the same type but use different storage pools. Also, the language provides for accessibility checks, both at compile time and at run time, that ensures that an access value cannot outlive the type of the object it points to.[20]

Though the semantics of the language allow automatic garbage collection of inaccessible objects, most implementations do not support it by default, as it would cause unpredictable behaviour in real-time systems. Ada does support a limited form of region-based memory management; also, creative use of storage pools can provide for a limited form of automatic garbage collection, since destroying a storage pool also destroys all the objects in the pool.

A double-dash ("--"), resembling an em dash, denotes comment text. Comments stop at end of line, to prevent unclosed comments from accidentally voiding whole sections of source code. Disabling a whole block of code now requires the prefixing of each line (or column) individually with "--". While clearly denoting disabled code with a column of repeated "--" down the page, this renders the experimental dis/re-enablement of large blocks a more drawn out process.

The semicolon (";") is a statement terminator, and the null or no-operation statement is null;. A single ; without a statement to terminate is not allowed.

Unlike most ISO standards, the Ada language definition (known as the Ada Reference Manual or ARM, or sometimes the Language Reference Manual or LRM) is free content. Thus, it is a common reference for Ada programmers, not only programmers implementing Ada compilers. Apart from the reference manual, there is also an extensive rationale document which explains the language design and the use of various language constructs. This document is also widely used by programmers. When the language was revised, a new rationale document was written.

One notable free software tool that is used by many Ada programmers to aid them in writing Ada source code is the GNAT Programming Studio, and GNAT which is part of the GNU Compiler Collection.


In the 1970s the US Department of Defense (DoD) became concerned by the number of different programming languages being used for its embedded computer system projects, many of which were obsolete or hardware-dependent, and none of which supported safe modular programming. In 1975, a working group, the High Order Language Working Group (HOLWG), was formed with the intent to reduce this number by finding or creating a programming language generally suitable for the department's and the UK Ministry of Defence's requirements. After many iterations beginning with an original straw-man proposal[21] the eventual programming language was named Ada. The total number of high-level programming languages in use for such projects fell from over 450 in 1983 to 37 by 1996.

HOLWG crafted the Steelman language requirements, a series of documents stating the requirements they felt a programming language should satisfy. Many existing languages were formally reviewed, but the team concluded in 1977 that no existing language met the specifications.

Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace.

Requests for proposals for a new programming language were issued and four contractors were hired to develop their proposals under the names of Red (Intermetrics led by Benjamin Brosgol), Green (Honeywell, led by Jean Ichbiah), Blue (SofTech, led by John Goodenough)[22] and Yellow (SRI International, led by Jay Spitzen). In April 1978, after public scrutiny, the Red and Green proposals passed to the next phase. In May 1979, the Green proposal, designed by Jean Ichbiah at Honeywell, was chosen and given the name Ada—after Augusta Ada, Countess of Lovelace. This proposal was influenced by the language LIS that Ichbiah and his group had developed in the 1970s. The preliminary Ada reference manual was published in ACM SIGPLAN Notices in June 1979. The Military Standard reference manual was approved on December 10, 1980 (Ada Lovelace's birthday), and given the number MIL-STD-1815 in honor of Ada Lovelace's birth year. In 1981, C. A. R. Hoare took advantage of his Turing Award speech to criticize Ada for being overly complex and hence unreliable,[23] but subsequently seemed to recant in the foreword he wrote for an Ada textbook.[24]

Ada attracted much attention from the programming community as a whole during its early days. Its backers and others predicted that it might become a dominant language for general purpose programming and not only defense-related work.[25] Ichbiah publicly stated that within ten years, only two programming languages would remain: Ada and Lisp.[26] Early Ada compilers struggled to implement the large, complex language, and both compile-time and run-time performance tended to be slow and tools primitive.[25] Compiler vendors expended most of their efforts in passing the massive, language-conformance-testing, government-required Ada Compiler Validation Capability (ACVC) validation suite that was required in another novel feature of the Ada language effort.[26] The Jargon File, a dictionary of computer hacker slang originating in 1975–1983, notes in an entry on Ada that "it is precisely what one might expect given that kind of endorsement by fiat; designed by committee...difficult to use, and overall a disastrous, multi-billion-dollar boondoggle...Ada Lovelace...would almost certainly blanch at the use her name has been latterly put to; the kindest thing that has been said about it is that there is probably a good small language screaming to get out from inside its vast, elephantine bulk."[27]

The first validated Ada implementation was the NYU Ada/Ed translator,[28] certified on April 11, 1983. NYU Ada/Ed is implemented in the high-level set language SETL.[29] Several commercial companies began offering Ada compilers and associated development tools, including Alsys, TeleSoft, DDC-I, Advanced Computer Techniques, Tartan Laboratories, Irvine Compiler, TLD Systems, and Verdix.[30] Computer manufacturers who had a significant business in the defense, aerospace, or related industries, also offered Ada compilers and tools on their platforms; these included Concurrent Computer Corporation, Cray Research, Inc., Digital Equipment Corporation, Harris Computer Systems, and Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG.[30]

In 1991, the US Department of Defense began to require the use of Ada (the Ada mandate) for all software,[31] though exceptions to this rule were often granted.[25] The Department of Defense Ada mandate was effectively removed in 1997, as the DoD began to embrace commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology.[25] Similar requirements existed in other NATO countries: Ada was required for NATO systems involving command and control and other functions, and Ada was the mandated or preferred language for defense-related applications in countries such as Sweden, Germany, and Canada.[32]

By the late 1980s and early 1990s, Ada compilers had improved in performance, but there were still barriers to fully exploiting Ada's abilities, including a tasking model that was different from what most real-time programmers were used to.[26]

Because of Ada's safety-critical support features, it is now used not only for military applications, but also in commercial projects where a software bug can have severe consequences, e.g., avionics and air traffic control, commercial rockets such as the Ariane 4 and 5, satellites and other space systems, railway transport and banking.[19] For example, the Airplane Information Management System, the fly-by-wire system software in the Boeing 777, was written in Ada.[33][34] Developed by Honeywell Air Transport Systems in collaboration with consultants from DDC-I, it became arguably the best-known of any Ada project, civilian or military.[33][34] The Canadian Automated Air Traffic System was written in 1 million lines of Ada (SLOC count). It featured advanced distributed processing, a distributed Ada database, and object-oriented design. Ada is also used in other air traffic systems, e.g., the UK's next-generation Interim Future Area Control Tools Support (iFACTS) air traffic control system is designed and implemented using SPARK Ada.[35] It is also used in the French TVM in-cab signalling system on the TGV high-speed rail system, and the metro suburban trains in Paris, London, Hong Kong and New York City.[19][36]


Preliminary Ada can be found in ACM Sigplan Notices Vol 14, No 6, June 1979.

Ada was first published in 1980 as an ANSI standard ANSI/MIL-STD 1815. As this very first version held many errors and inconsistencies (see Summary of Ada Language Changes), the revised edition was published in 1983 as ANSI/MIL-STD 1815A. Without any further changes, it became an ISO standard in 1987, ISO 8652:1987. This version of the language is commonly known as Ada 83, from the date of its adoption by ANSI, but is sometimes referred to also as Ada 87, from the date of its adoption by ISO. This is the Ada 83 Reference Manual. There is also a French translation; DIN translated it into German as DIN 66268 in 1988.

Ada 95, the joint ISO/IEC/ANSI standard ISO/IEC 8652:1995 (see Ada 95 RM) was published in February 1995, making it the first ISO standard object-oriented programming language. To help with the standard revision and future acceptance, the US Air Force funded the development of the GNAT Compiler. Presently, the GNAT Compiler is part of the GNU Compiler Collection.

Work has continued on improving and updating the technical content of the Ada language. A Technical Corrigendum to Ada 95 was published in October 2001, ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Corr 1:2001 (see Ada 95 RM with TC 1), and a major Amendment, ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Amd 1:2007 (see Ada 2005 RM) was published on March 9, 2007, commonly known as Ada 2005 because work on the new standard was finished that year.

At the Ada-Europe 2012 conference in Stockholm, the Ada Resource Association (ARA) and Ada-Europe announced the completion of the design of the latest version of the Ada language and the submission of the reference manual to the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22/WG 9 of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for approval. ISO/IEC 8652:2012 (see Ada 2012 RM) was published in December 2012, known as Ada 2012. A technical corrigendum was published ISO/IEC 8652:2012/COR 1:2016 (see RM 2012 with TC 1).

Despite the names Ada 83, 95 etc., legally there is only one Ada standard, the one of the last ISO/IEC standard: with the acceptance of a new standard version, the previous one becomes withdrawn. The other names are just informal ones referencing a certain edition.

Other related standards include ISO/IEC 8651-3:1988 Information processing systems—Computer graphics—Graphical Kernel System (GKS) language bindings—Part 3: Ada.

Language constructs[edit]

Ada is an ALGOL-like programming language featuring control structures with reserved words such as if, then, else, while, for, and so on. However, Ada also has many data structuring facilities and other abstractions which were not included in the original ALGOL 60, such as type definitions, records, pointers, enumerations. Such constructs were in part inherited from or inspired by Pascal.

"Hello, world!" in Ada[edit]

A common example of a language's syntax is the Hello world program: (hello.adb)

with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Hello is
   Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Hello, world!");
end Hello;

This program can be compiled by using the freely available open source compiler GNAT, by executing

gnatmake hello.adb

Data types[edit]

Ada's type system is not based on a set of predefined primitive types but allows users to declare their own types. This declaration in turn is not based on the internal representation of the type but on describing the goal which should be achieved. This allows the compiler to determine a suitable memory size for the type, and to check for violations of the type definition at compile time and run time (i.e., range violations, buffer overruns, type consistency, etc.). Ada supports numerical types defined by a range, modulo types, aggregate types (records and arrays), and enumeration types. Access types define a reference to an instance of a specified type; untyped pointers are not permitted. Special types provided by the language are task types and protected types.

For example, a date might be represented as:

type Day_type   is range    1 ..   31;
type Month_type is range    1 ..   12;
type Year_type  is range 1800 .. 2100;
type Hours is mod 24;
type Weekday is (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday);

type Date is
     Day   : Day_type;
     Month : Month_type;
     Year  : Year_type;
   end record;

Important to note: Day_type, Month_type, Year_type, Hours are incompatible types, meaning that for instance the following expression is illegal:

Today: Day_type := 4;
Current_Month: Month_type := 10;
... Today + Current_Month ...  -- illegal

The predefined plus-operator can only add values of the same type, so the expression is illegal.

Types can be refined by declaring subtypes:

subtype Working_Hours is Hours range 0 .. 12;            -- at most 12 Hours to work a day
subtype Working_Day is Weekday range Monday .. Friday;   -- Days to work

Work_Load: constant array(Working_Day) of Working_Hours  -- implicit type declaration
   := (Friday => 6, Monday => 4, others => 10);           -- lookup table for working hours with initialization

Types can have modifiers such as limited, abstract, private etc. Private types do not show their inner structure; objects of limited types cannot be copied.[37] Ada 95 adds further features for object-oriented extension of types.

Control structures[edit]

Ada is a structured programming language, meaning that the flow of control is structured into standard statements. All standard constructs and deep-level early exit are supported, so the use of the also supported "go to" commands is seldom needed.

-- while a is not equal to b, loop.
while a /= b loop
  Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Waiting");
end loop;

if a > b then
  Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Condition met");
  Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Condition not met");
end if;

for i in 1 .. 10 loop
  Ada.Text_IO.Put ("Iteration: ");
  Ada.Text_IO.Put (i);
end loop;

  a := a + 1;
  exit when a = 10;
end loop;

case i is
  when 0 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("zero");
  when 1 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("one");
  when 2 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("two");
  -- case statements have to cover all possible cases:
  when others => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("none of the above");
end case;

for aWeekday in Weekday'Range loop               -- loop over an enumeration
   Put_Line ( Weekday'Image(aWeekday) );         -- output string representation of an enumeration
   if aWeekday in Working_Day then               -- check of a subtype of an enumeration
      Put_Line ( " to work for " &
               Working_Hours'Image (Work_Load(aWeekday)) ); -- access into a lookup table
   end if;
end loop;

Packages, procedures and functions[edit]

Among the parts of an Ada program are packages, procedures and functions.

Example: Package specification (

package Example is
     type Number is range 1 .. 11;
     procedure Print_and_Increment (j: in out Number);
end Example;

Package body (example.adb)

with Ada.Text_IO;
package body Example is

  i : Number := Number'First;

  procedure Print_and_Increment (j: in out Number) is

    function Next (k: in Number) return Number is
      return k + 1;
    end Next;

    Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ( "The total is: " & Number'Image(j) );
    j := Next (j);
  end Print_and_Increment;

-- package initialization executed when the package is elaborated
  while i < Number'Last loop
    Print_and_Increment (i);
  end loop;
end Example;

This program can be compiled, e.g., by using the freely available open-source compiler GNAT, by executing

gnatmake -z example.adb

Packages, procedures and functions can nest to any depth, and each can also be the logical outermost block.

Each package, procedure or function can have its own declarations of constants, types, variables, and other procedures, functions and packages, which can be declared in any order.


Ada has language support for task-based concurrency. The fundamental concurrent unit in Ada is a task, which is a built-in limited type. Tasks are specified in two parts – the task declaration defines the task interface (similar to a type declaration), the task body specifies the implementation of the task. Depending on the implementation, Ada tasks are either mapped to operating system threads or processes, or are scheduled internally by the Ada runtime.

Tasks can have entries for synchronisation (a form of synchronous message passing). Task entries are declared in the task specification. Each task entry can have one or more accept statements within the task body. If the control flow of the task reaches an accept statement, the task is blocked until the corresponding entry is called by another task (similarly, a calling task is blocked until the called task reaches the corresponding accept statement). Task entries can have parameters similar to procedures, allowing tasks to synchronously exchange data. In conjunction with select statements it is possible to define guards on accept statements (similar to Dijkstra's guarded commands).

Ada also offers protected objects for mutual exclusion. Protected objects are a monitor-like construct, but use guards instead of conditional variables for signaling (similar to conditional critical regions). Protected objects combine the data encapsulation and safe mutual exclusion from monitors, and entry guards from conditional critical regions. The main advantage over classical monitors is that conditional variables are not required for signaling, avoiding potential deadlocks due to incorrect locking semantics. Like tasks, the protected object is a built-in limited type, and it also has a declaration part and a body.

A protected object consists of encapsulated private data (which can only be accessed from within the protected object), and procedures, functions and entries which are guaranteed to be mutually exclusive (with the only exception of functions, which are required to be side effect free and can therefore run concurrently with other functions). A task calling a protected object is blocked if another task is currently executing inside the same protected object, and released when this other task leaves the protected object. Blocked tasks are queued on the protected object ordered by time of arrival.

Protected object entries are similar to procedures, but additionally have guards. If a guard evaluates to false, a calling task is blocked and added to the queue of that entry; now another task can be admitted to the protected object, as no task is currently executing inside the protected object. Guards are re-evaluated whenever a task leaves the protected object, as this is the only time when the evaluation of guards can have changed.

Calls to entries can be requeued to other entries with the same signature. A task that is requeued is blocked and added to the queue of the target entry; this means that the protected object is released and allows admission of another task.

The select statement in Ada can be used to implement non-blocking entry calls and accepts, non-deterministic selection of entries (also with guards), time-outs and aborts.

The following example illustrates some concepts of concurrent programming in Ada.

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

procedure Traffic is

   type Airplane_ID is range 1..10;             -- 10 airplanes

   task type Airplane (ID: Airplane_ID);        -- task representing airplanes, with ID as initialisation parameter
   type Airplane_Access is access Airplane;     -- reference type to Airplane

   protected type Runway is                     -- the shared runway (protected to allow concurrent access)
      entry Assign_Aircraft (ID: Airplane_ID);  -- all entries are guaranteed mutually exclusive
      entry Cleared_Runway (ID: Airplane_ID);
      entry Wait_For_Clear;
      Clear: Boolean := True;                   -- protected private data - generally more than only a flag...
   end Runway;
   type Runway_Access is access all Runway;

   -- the air traffic controller task takes requests for takeoff and landing
   task type Controller (My_Runway: Runway_Access) is
      -- task entries for synchronous message passing
      entry Request_Takeoff (ID: in Airplane_ID; Takeoff: out Runway_Access);
      entry Request_Approach(ID: in Airplane_ID; Approach: out Runway_Access);
   end Controller;

   --  allocation of instances
   Runway1    : aliased Runway;              -- instantiate a runway
   Controller1: Controller (Runway1'Access); -- and a controller to manage it

   ------ the implementations of the above types ------
   protected body Runway is
      entry Assign_Aircraft (ID: Airplane_ID)
 when Clear is   -- the entry guard - calling tasks are blocked until the condition is true
       Clear := False;
       Put_Line (Airplane_ID'Image (ID) & " on runway ");

      entry Cleared_Runway (ID: Airplane_ID)
 when not Clear is
         Clear := True;
         Put_Line (Airplane_ID'Image (ID) & " cleared runway ");

      entry Wait_For_Clear
 when Clear is
         null;      -- no need to do anything here - a task can only enter if "Clear" is true
   end Runway;

   task body Controller is
         My_Runway.Wait_For_Clear;   -- wait until runway is available (blocking call)
         select                      -- wait for two types of requests (whichever is runnable first)
            when Request_Approach'count = 0 =>  -- guard statement - only accept if there are no tasks queuing on Request_Approach
             accept Request_Takeoff (ID: in Airplane_ID; Takeoff: out Runway_Access)
             do                                 -- start of synchronized part
               My_Runway.Assign_Aircraft (ID);  -- reserve runway (potentially blocking call if protected object busy or entry guard false)
               Takeoff := My_Runway;            -- assign "out" parameter value to tell airplane which runway
             end Request_Takeoff;               -- end of the synchronised part
            accept Request_Approach (ID: in Airplane_ID; Approach: out Runway_Access) do
               My_Runway.Assign_Aircraft (ID);
               Approach := My_Runway;
            end Request_Approach;
         or                          -- terminate if no tasks left who could call
         end select;
      end loop;

   task body Airplane is
      Rwy : Runway_Access;
      Controller1.Request_Takeoff (ID, Rwy); -- This call blocks until Controller task accepts and completes the accept block
      Put_Line (Airplane_ID'Image (ID) & "  taking off...");
      delay 2.0;
      Rwy.Cleared_Runway (ID);               -- call will not block as "Clear" in Rwy is now false and no other tasks should be inside protected object
      delay 5.0; -- fly around a bit...
         select   -- try to request a runway
            Controller1.Request_Approach (ID, Rwy); -- this is a blocking call - will run on controller reaching accept block and return on completion
            exit; -- if call returned we're clear for landing - leave select block and proceed...
            delay 3.0;  -- timeout - if no answer in 3 seconds, do something else (everything in following block)
            Put_Line (Airplane_ID'Image (ID) & "   in holding pattern");  -- simply print a message
         end select;
      end loop;
      delay 4.0;  -- do landing approach...
      Put_Line (Airplane_ID'Image (ID) & "            touched down!");
      Rwy.Cleared_Runway (ID);  -- notify runway that we're done here.

   New_Airplane: Airplane_Access;

   for I in Airplane_ID'Range loop  -- create a few airplane tasks
      New_Airplane := new Airplane (I); -- will start running directly after creation
      delay 4.0;
   end loop;
end Traffic;


A pragma is a compiler directive that conveys information to the compiler to allow specific manipulating of compiled output.[38] Certain pragmas are built into the language,[39] while others are implementation-specific.

Examples of common usage of compiler pragmas would be to disable certain features, such as run-time type checking or array subscript boundary checking, or to instruct the compiler to insert object code instead of a function call (as C/C++ does with inline functions).


Ada has had generics since it was first designed in 1977–1980. The standard library uses generics to provide many services. Ada 2005 adds a comprehensive generic container library to the standard library, which was inspired by C++'s standard template library.

A generic unit is a package or a subprogram that takes one or more generic formal parameters.

A generic formal parameter is a value, a variable, a constant, a type, a subprogram, or even an instance of another, designated, generic unit. For generic formal types, the syntax distinguishes between discrete, floating-point, fixed-point, access (pointer) types, etc. Some formal parameters can have default values.

To instantiate a generic unit, the programmer passes actual parameters for each formal. The generic instance then behaves just like any other unit. It is possible to instantiate generic units at run-time, for example inside a loop.

See also[edit]

  • APSE – a specification for a programming environment to support software development in Ada
  • Ravenscar profile – a subset of the Ada tasking features designed for safety-critical hard real-time computing
  • SPARK – a programming language consisting of a highly restricted subset of Ada, annotated with meta-information describing desired component behavior and individual runtime requirements


  1. ^ "Ada2012 Rationale" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2016. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  2. ^ "Technical Corrigendum for Ada 2012 published by ISO". Ada Resource Association. 2016-01-29. Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  3. ^ "Consolidated Ada 2012 Language Reference Manual". Ada Conformity Assessment Authority. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  4. ^ "Commercial software solutions for Ada, C and C++". AdaCore. Retrieved Apr 4, 2023.
  5. ^ "PTC ObjectAda". Retrieved 2014-01-27.
  6. ^ "MapuSoft Ada-C/C++ changer". 16 April 2019.
  7. ^ "Ada 95 Certified Processors List - Details". Retrieved Apr 4, 2023.
  8. ^ Ada Rationale, 1986, pp. 23, 70, 110–114, 137, 165, 236
  9. ^ "Chapel spec (Acknowledgements)" (PDF). Cray Inc. 2015-10-01. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2016-01-14.
  10. ^ "Drago". Archived from the original on 2020-09-14. Retrieved 2018-08-06.
  11. ^ "The Griffin Project". Retrieved Apr 4, 2023.
  12. ^ "SparForte Programming Language". Retrieved Apr 4, 2023.
  13. ^ Ganssle, Jack (2013-05-29). "Ada Resource Association – News and resource for the Ada programming language". Retrieved 2013-06-14.
  14. ^ "ISO/IEC 8652:2012 Information technology – Programming languages – Ada". International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved 2012-12-23.
  15. ^ "The Ada Programming Language". University of Mich. Archived from the original on 2016-05-22. Retrieved 27 May 2016.
  16. ^ Fuegi, J; Francis, J (2003). "Lovelace & Babbage and the creation of the 1843 'notes'". IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. 25 (4): 16–26. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2003.1253887. S2CID 40077111.
  17. ^ "Concurrency - Chapter 6 - Ada 95 QUALITY AND STYLE Guide". Retrieved November 5, 2021.
  18. ^ Taft, S. Tucker; Olsen, Florence (1999-06-30). "Ada helps churn out less-buggy code". Government Computer News. pp. 2–3. Archived from the original on 2015-08-31. Retrieved 2010-09-14.
  19. ^ a b c Feldman, Michael. "Who's using Ada?". SIGAda Education Working Group.
  20. ^ no safe dynamic memory management in ADA, in: Writing Linux Kernel Modules in Safe Rust - Geoffrey Thomas & Alex Gaynor , The Linux Foundation, 2019-10-02
  21. ^ "DoD - Strawman Requirements - April 1975". Retrieved Apr 4, 2023.
  22. ^ "John Goodenough | SEI Staff Profile". Retrieved 2014-01-27.
  23. ^ C.A.R., Hoare (1981). "The Emperor's Old Clothes" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. Association for Computing Machinery. 24 (2): 75–83. doi:10.1145/358549.358561. S2CID 97895. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  24. ^ Watt, D.A.; Wichmann, B.A.; Findlay, W. (1987). Ada: Language and Methodology. Prentice-Hall.
  25. ^ a b c d Sward, Ricky E. (November 2010). "The rise, fall and persistence of Ada". SIGAda '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGAda annual international conference on SIGAda. pp. 71–74. doi:10.1145/1879063.1879081.
  26. ^ a b c Rosen, J-P. (August 2009). "The Ada Paradox(es)". Ada Letters. ACM SIGAda. 24 (2): 28–35. doi:10.1145/1620593.1620597. S2CID 608405.
  27. ^ "THIS IS THE JARGON FILE, VERSION 2.6.2" (TXT). 1991-02-14. Retrieved 2023-01-31.
  28. ^ SofTech Inc. (1983-04-11). "Ada Compiler Validation Summary Report: NYU Ada/ED, Version 19.7 V-001". Waltham, MA. Archived from the original on 2012-03-12. Retrieved 2010-12-16.
  29. ^ Dewar, Robert B. K.; Fisher, Gerald A. Jr.; Schonberg, Edmond; Froelich, Robert; Bryant, Stephen; Goss, Clinton F.; Burke, Michael (November 1980). "The NYU Ada translator and interpreter". Proceeding of the ACM-SIGPLAN symposium on Ada programming language - SIGPLAN '80. Vol. 15. pp. 194–201. doi:10.1145/948632.948659. ISBN 0-89791-030-3. S2CID 10586359.
  30. ^ a b "Ada Validated Compilers List". Ada Information Clearinghouse. July 1, 1992. pp. 1–36.
  31. ^ Ada Information Clearinghouse (1983-04-11). "The Congressional Ada Mandate". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-06-07.
  32. ^ Babiak, Nicholas J. (1989). Ada, the New DoD Weapon System Computer Language – Panacea or Calamity (PDF). Air University (United States Air Force). pp. 39–40. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 15, 2019.
  33. ^ a b Rehmer, Karl (2009). "The HADS Team". In Stellman, Andrew; Greene, Jennifer (eds.). Beautiful Teams: Inspiring and Cautionary Tales from Veteran Team Leaders. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly. pp. 299–312.
  34. ^ a b Wolfe, Alexander (October 2004). "There's Still Some Life Left in Ada". ACM Queue. 2 (7): 28–31. doi:10.1145/1035594.1035608.
  35. ^ AdaCore. "GNAT Pro Chosen for UK's Next Generation ATC System". Archived from the original on 2010-12-24. Retrieved 2011-03-01.
  36. ^ AdaCore. "Look Who's Using Ada". Archived from the original on 2010-12-24. Retrieved 2011-03-01.
  37. ^ "Ada Syntax Card" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 28 February 2011.
  38. ^ "Ada 83 LRM, Sec 2.8: Pragmas". Retrieved 2014-01-27.
  39. ^ "Ada 83 LRM, Appendix/Annex B: Predefined Language Pragmas". Archived from the original on 2012-02-06. Retrieved 2014-01-27.

International standards[edit]


These documents have been published in various forms, including print.



External links[edit]