Battle of Vlotho
| Battle of Vlotho | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Thirty Years' War | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
|
 Sweden |
 Holy Roman Empire | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Charles I Louis, Elector Palatine
James King, 1st Lord Eythin.[1] | Melchior von Hatzfeldt.[2] | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| 4,000: 1,500 infantry, 2,500 cavalry.[1] | 5,800: 1,800 infantry, 4,000 cavalry.[2] | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| 1,200 taken prisoner.[citation needed] | 79 casualties.[citation needed] | ||||||
The Battle of Vlotho was fought on 17 October 1638, it was a victory for the Imperial Army under the command of Field Marshal Melchior von Hatzfeldt, and ended the attempt by Charles I Louis, Elector Palatine, to recapture the Palatinate.[3] Charles Louis' defeat marked the last time either Palatine or English forces played a significant role in the Thirty Years' War.
Background
Frederick V, the Winter King, had died in 1632. The desire to recover the Palatinate, which had sparked English intervention in the Thirty Years' War in the previous years was at this point disregarded by most. In 1638 Charles Louis, 2nd son and heir of Frederick made one last attempt to recover his territories. Choosing as his base of operations the town of Meppen, on the Münster-East Frisian frontier, he raised a force of 4,000 men using English gold. Alongside Charles Louis were his brother Prince Rupert and a company of English gallants dedicated to the Winter Queen, including Lord Craven,[4] and the Earl of Northampton.[5][1]
To assist Charles Louis, the commander of the Swedish army Johan Banér sent Charles Louis a 1,000 strong detachment, under the command Lieutenant-General James King (a Scot who had commanded the Swedish left wing at the Battle of Wittstock in 1636).[1] Many of these were British, such as Colonel William Vavasour.[citation needed]
The original plan was to form the army in Westphalia and then to advance through Hesse and to retake the Palatine. However Banér considered this to be unrealistic and persuaded the participants that they should start by besieging and capturing Lemgo, ostensibly to secure their lines of communication, but it also suited the wider war aims of the Swedes because whatever else happened during the campaign it would be a concrete loss for Banér's enemies and a gain for him.[1]
On 15 October 1638 the Palatine-Swedish army started to besiege Lemgo, and the Imperial Field Marshal Melchior von Hatzfeldt—who had been assigned to command Imperial forces in Westphalia after his defeat at Wittstock, immediately started to assemble a relief force.[3]
The next day this approaching force was detected by Palatine-Swedish vedettes who estimated it to be 8,000 strong, so their commanders decided to raise the siege and retreat to the Swedish fortress at Minden. The Palatines had two possible routes to Minden, they chose to take the road to Vlotho, which was shorter, but also meant that they remained on the same side of the river Weser as the Hatzfeldt. Their major problem was that unless they abandoned their artillery and baggage train whatever route they took Hatzfeldt unencumbered force was going to catch up with them.[2]
The Battle
The faster Imperial force managed to outpace the Palatines and cut off their path at Vlotho bridge.[2]
The Palatines had ordered their marching column with the baggage at the front, followed by their cavalry with the infantry and artillery at the rear. King formed the Palatines cavalry up in a defensive line on the Eiberg hillock and set off to bring up the infantry. [2]
After King had left, his subordinate Hans von Königsmarck suggested that rather than wait for their infantry they could send their cavalry forward up a narrow valley which would act as a defile and prevent Hatzfeldt from concentrating his forces against them. Charles Louis and Craven agreed to the plan, so three cavalry regiments under the command of Königsmarck were sent forward up the defile one behind the other, while the dragoons and the two commanders remained on the hillock abating the arrival of their infantry.[2]
As soon as he saw what the Palatines cavalry was doing, Hatzfeldt ordered two of his own cavalry regiments to advance down the valley to meet the enemy and sent a further 800 on a flanking attack which was concealed by the low hills that surrounded the valley.[2]
In the clash that followed the two leading Palatine regiments broke. The third regiment was commanded by Prince Rupert who, in an early example of a manoeuvre he would become famous for in the English Civil War, ordered a flat out charge. Hatzfeldt's cavalry were driven out of the valley. As Rupert's cavalry debouched from the defile they were hemmed in by Hatzfeldt superior forces. Craven led the Palatine reserves—two regiments of dragoons—up the defile to support Rupert attack, but the Imperial cavalry sent to flank the attackers closed in from behind enveloping Rupert's cavalry and Craven's reinforcements.[2]
The position was now hopeless, and rather than reinforce failure Königsmarck withdrew with his Swedish cavalry. Before surrendering Rupert's and Craven's soldiers held on long enough to allow King to withdraw all the Swedish contingent in good order, but the battle was lost.[2]
Charles Louis tried to escape in his coach but it sank in the Weser. He survived by clutching a branch and managed to return to his Dutch exile.[citation needed]
Aftermath
In the opinion of William Guthrie:
Hatzfeld demonstrated a cool professionalism in this minor action, which was not in evidence at Wittstock or Jankow. The Swedish veterans King and Konigsmarck, on the other hand, outdid themselves in ineptitude. King, unfairly, blamed Rupert for the defeat; the two were still feuding 10 years later. Konigsmarck escaped all censure and later became one of Torstensson's most trusted officers.[2]
The defeat was the last gasp of the Palatine cause and English intervention in the war. Soon the start of the English Civil War prompted the return of most British soldiers and officers.
Notes
- ^ a b c d e Guthrie 2003, p. 72. Cite error: The named reference "FOOTNOTEGuthrie200372" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Guthrie 2003, p. 73.
- ^ a b Guthrie 2003, pp. 72, 73.
- ^ Wilson 2009, p. 594.
- ^ Bennett 2007, Compton....
References
- Bennett, Martyn (May 2007) [2004]. "Compton, Spencer, second earl of Northampton (1601–1643)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/6035. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- Guthrie, William P (2003), "Appendix F:The Action at Vlotho, October 17, 1638", The Later Thirty Years War: From the Battle of Wittstock to the Treaty of Westphalia, Contributions in Military Studies, vol. 222 (illustrated ed.), Greenwood Publishing Group, pp. 72, 73, ISBN 9780313324086
- Wilson, Peter Hamish (2009), The Thirty Years War: Europe's Tragedy (illustrated, reprint ed.), Harvard University Press, pp. 594, 495, ISBN 9780674036345