Jump to content

Bouncing bomb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thijs!bot (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 14 June 2007 (robot Adding: fr:Bombe rebondissante). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The bouncing bomb was a variety of depth charge style of bomb designed by Barnes Wallis of Vickers-Armstrong at Brooklands, Surrey. It was used in the famous Dambusters raid to attack major dams in Germany's industrial Ruhr Valley during World War II.

An original Upkeep bouncing bomb at the Imperial War Museum Duxford

Origins

Barnes Wallis first began to think of producing a bouncing bomb in 1941. He was aware that in the nineteenth century the Royal Navy had observed that cannonballs sometimes bounced on water which increased their range.

In April 1942 he published a paper named "Spherical Bomb — Surface Torpedo".

Anti-shipping weapon (Highball)

Initially his work on the device was to attack battleships. The bomb could be released away from the ships; the bomb would skip over anti-torpedo defences, and when it struck would roll down the hull to below the waterline, where a battleship would be least protected. An additional advantage was that the bomb could contain a much greater quantity of explosive than a torpedo. This version of the bomb, which was sphere-shaped and dimpled like a golf ball, was codenamed Highball and was developed to be dropped from a modified de Havilland Mosquito that could carry two of the weapons.

Anti-dam weapon (Upkeep)

Principle of the bouncing bomb used to destroy the dams

During World War II, the Royal Air Force identified German hydro-electric dams as targets. However, dams were immune to conventional attack because of their size; an immense amount of explosive would be required to breach them because then-current bomb aiming techniques would not allow the placing of a bomb with the required accuracy to avoid the cushioning effect of the water. The other possibility, a torpedo attack, had been foreseen by the Germans, who had guarded against this by placing heavy nets upstream of the dams. Barnes Wallis observed that a larger version of the 'bouncing' anti-ship weapon would skip over the anti-torpedo nets and sink in contact with the dam, where the water would act as a natural tamping medium, directing the explosion onto the dam, instead of protecting it, and greatly reducing the explosive power required.

At the start of 1943 Wallis showed his finished paper "Air Attack on Dams", reporting on the results of experiments including scale models and tests from aircraft.[1]

Owing to time constraints set by the Royal Air Force, the final version of the anti-dam weapon, codenamed Upkeep (also known as the "Vickers Type 464"), was different to Barnes Wallis's initial intentions, dispensing with the spherical metal shell and the "dimples". Referred-to as a "mine" and officially termed the "Upkeep store", it weighed 4 200 kg (9,250 lb) including 3 000 kg (6,600 lb) of Torpex explosive. The choice of Torpex was deliberate: although its brisance is lower than Composition B, the aluminium component in Torpex made the explosive pulse last longer, which was particularly destructive to underwater targets. The bomb was cylindrical in shape, 152 cm (60 inches) in length and 142 cm (56 inches) in diameter. The bomb was designed to be spun backwards at high velocity (500 rpm) before being released. It then literally bounced over the water (avoiding the torpedo nets) in the same way that a spinning stone will skip. However, to achieve this effect the bomb had to be released from a very low (18 m or 60 ft) and very precise height, at 386-402 km/h (240-250 mph), 365-457 m (400-500 yards) from the target. On striking the dam the bomb would sink to a prescribed depth of 9.1 m (30 ft) before being detonated by hydrostatic fuse. As a back-up, a chemical time fuse detonated the bomb if the hydrostatic fuse failed.

File:Mosquito Dropping Highball.jpg
A de Havilland Mosquito dropping a Highball bouncing bomb at the Fleet Lagoon behind Chesil Beach, Dorset.

The bombs were successfully deployed using the Avro Lancasters of No. 617 Squadron RAF in Operation Chastise (the Dambusters Raid). The raid, on the night of 16/17 May 1943, was led by Wing Commander Guy Gibson, for which he was awarded the Victoria Cross. The results of the raid were that out of the six intended targets, four were damaged and two were destroyed.

Further employment

Although Operation Chastise was considered a success, the high loss of life in the raid — eight out of 19 planes sent on the raid did not return — prompted the Upkeep bomb project to be discontinued. Highball was to have been used by No. 618 Squadron RAF against the German battleship Tirpitz and then against Japanese shipping in the Pacific Theatre but the war ended without it being used in conflict.

Both Upkeep and Highball remained Official Secrets until January 1974, when (along with the documents revealing the Ultra secret) the files were released under Britain's "thirty year rule".

German bouncing bomb

After Operation Chastise, the Germans discovered an Upkeep bomb that had failed to explode lying in some woods and subsequently a 385 kg (850 pound) version of the bouncing bomb was also trialed by the Luftwaffe. Designed for use against British shipping, it was given the codename Kurt, and was built at the Luftwaffe Experimental Centre in Travemünde. In trials, dropped by an Fw 190 it proved to be dangerous to the delivering planes as the bomb matched the speed at which it was dropped. Attempts to rectify this with booster rockets were ultimately a failure, and the project was discontinued in 1944.

Soviet bouncing bomb

The Soviets also utilized a bouncing bomb during WW2. These were used in the sinking of the German anti-aircraft cruiser Niobe in Kotka, Finland on 16 July 1944.

Surviving bombs

All combat Upkeep bombs were disposed of at the end of hostilities. However, concrete-filled bombs were used in test and training drops at Reculver, Kent. Several of these have been recovered in the years since the war and are displayed at various sites:

See also

References

  1. ^ [1]