Category talk:Indonesian landlords

This category was nominated for splitting on 1 August 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles

Netherlands

This category falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Biography

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Move?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I think we should change the title of this category from 'Indonesian landlords' to 'Landheeren', which is more specific and accurate.

+Marie+Leung+ (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with your proposal, but the way to make this happen is to bring it up at Categories for discussion.

My disagreement is two-fold; a) I think we should prefer terms in English and b) using Landheeren would seem to constrain the category to a certain historical period. Your edits to the category description are already attempting to constrain the category in a way that does not seem to have been present when the category originated. In principle, a modern-day real estate magnate in Indonesia ought to be able to fit into this category. But that's the sort of thing a discussion at CfD would figure out. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} from a casual glance of the articles in this category, most of the landlords seem to fall in the 'Landheeren' category. So, I assumed the category was referring to the more restricted historical period I outlined in the category description. Maybe, we should have 'Landheeren' as a separate sub-category that could come under 'Indonesian landlords', which could in turn stay as a broader category that might include modern-day real estate magnates or Indonesia's massive agricultural conglomerates. I won't make any changes until I hear back from you. Thank you.

+Marie+Leung+ (talk) 04:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+Marie+Leung+, I saw that, too. But categories are not necessarily defined by their current membership. That's why I suggested a discussion at CfD.

A subcategory 'Landheeren' is not entirely out of place, either, with your category description (or some version of it) transferred there. I'd interpret that as a sort of 'split', so should still get consensus at CfD.

You'll find that the participants at CfD are drawn from a somewhat different population of editors than the ones who respond to {{help me}} requests. They'll likely have better arguments drawn from policy than I have at my command. Same goes for your other move request. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:18, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]