An electrogastrogram (EGG) is a graphic produced by an electrogastrograph, which records the electrical signals that travel through the stomach muscles and control the muscles' contractions. An electrogastroenterogram (or gastroenterogram) is a similar procedure, which writes down electric signals not only from the stomach, but also from intestines.
These names are made of different parts: electro, because it is related to electrical activity, gastro, Greek for stomach, entero, Greek for intestines, gram, a Greek root meaning "to write".
An electrogastrogram and a gastroenterogram are similar in principle to an electrocardiogram (ECG) in that sensors on the skin detect electrical signals indicative of muscular activity within. Where the electrocardiogram detects muscular activity in various regions of the heart, the electrogastrogram detects the wave-like contractions of the stomach (peristalsis).
- 1 Physiological basis of electrogastroenterography
- 2 Cutaneous electrogastrography
- 3 Electrogastroenterography
- 4 Psychological applications of electrogastrograms
- 5 Unsolved problems
- 6 Other updatings of electrogastrography
- 7 Clinical applications of electrogastrography and gastroenterography
- 8 See also
- 9 Sources
- 10 References
Physiological basis of electrogastroenterography
Motility of GI tract is results from coordinated contractions of smooth muscle, which in turn derive from two basic patterns of electrical activity across the membranes of smooth muscle cells — slow waves and action potentials. Slow waves are initiated by pacemakers — the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). Slow wave frequency varies in the different organs of the GI tract and is characteristic for that organ. They set the maximum frequency at which the muscle can contract:
- stomach — about 3 waves in a minute,
- duodenum — about 12 waves in a minute,
- ileum — about 8 waves in a minute,
- rectum — about 17 waves in a minute.
- jejunum — about 11 waves in a minute.
The electrical activity of the GI tract can be subdivided into two categories: electrical control activity (ECA) and electrical response activity (ERA). ECA is characterized by regularly recurring electrical potentials, originating in the gastric pacemaker located in the body of stomach. The slow waves are not a direct reason of peristalsis of a GI tract, but a correlation between deviations of slow waves from norm and motility abnormalities however is proved.
Electrogastrogram can be made from the gastrointestinal mucosa, serosa, or skin surface. The cutaneous electrogastrography provides an indirect representation of the electrical activity but it is much easier and therefore cutaneous electrogastrography has been used most frequently.
Several EGG signals are recorded from various standardized positions on the abdominal wall and to select the one with the highest amplitude for further analysis. For this purpose usually use three or more Ag-AgCl electrodes. Recordings are made both fasting (usually 30 minutes) and after a meal (usually 60 minutes) with the patient lying quietly. Deviations from the normal frequency may be referred to as bradygastria or tachygastria.
In normal individuals the power of the electrical signals increases after the meal. In patients with abnormalities of stomach motility, the rhythm often is irregular or there is no postprandial increase in electrical power.
Bradygastria, normogastria and tachygastria
Terms bradygastria and tachygastria are used at the description of deviations of frequency of an electric signal from slow waves are initiated by pacemaker in the stomach from normal frequency of 3 cycles per minute.
A bradygastria is defined, how decreased rate of electrical activity in the stomach, as less than 2 cycles per minute for at least 1 minute.
A tachygastria is defined, how increased rate of electrical activity in the stomach, as more than 4 cycles per minute for at least 1 minute.
CPT and HCPCS codes for electrogastrography
There are following Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes (maintained by the American Medical Association) for cutaneous electrogastrography:
|91132||Electrogastrography, diagnostic, transcutaneous|
|91133||Electrogastrography, diagnostic, transcutaneous; with provocative testing|
An electrogastroenterography (EGEG) is based that different organs of a GI tract give different frequency slow wave.
|Organ of gastrointestinal tract||Investigated range (Hz)||Frequency number (i)|
|Large intestine||0.01 – 0.03||5|
|Stomach||0.03 – 0.07||1|
|Ileum||0.07 – 0.13||4|
|Jejunum||0.13 – 0.18||3|
|Duodenum||0.18 – 0.25||2|
EGEG electrodes are as much as possible removed from a stomach and an intestines — usaually three electrodes are placed on the extremities. It allows to receive stabler and comparable results.
The computer analysis of electrogastroenterograms
An electrogastroenterography analysis program calculate
- P(i) — capacities of an electric signal separately from each of organ of GI tract in corresponding range of frequencies:
where S(n) — spectral components in the rank from sti to fini (defined by received investigated range of this organ of GI tract) by Discrete Fourier transform of the electric signal from GI tract.
- PS — the general (total) capacity of an electric signal from five parts of GI tract:
- P(i)/PS — the relative electric activity.
- Kritm(i) — rhythm factor
EGEG parametres for normal patients:
|Organ of gastrointestinal tract||Electric activity P(i)/PS||Rhythm factor Kritm(i)||P(i)/P(i+1)|
Psychological applications of electrogastrograms
Psychologists have performed psychophysiological studies to see what happens in the body during affective experiences. Electrogastrograms have recently been used to test physiological arousal, which was already determined by measures such as heart rate, electrodermal skin responses, and changes in hormone levels in saliva.
Currently, a pattern of interest to psychologists is an increase in bradygastria,which is when electrical activity in the stomach drops to below 2 cpm resulting in a slower stomach rhythm, when exposed to disgust stimuli, which may be a precursor to nausea and vomiting, both physiological responses to disgust. In this study, the presence of bradygastria was able to predict trait and state disgust, which no other physiological measure used in the study was able to detect. This abnormal myoelectrical activity is usually combined with other precursors to nausea and vomiting, such as increased salivary production, which further supports the idea that these rhythms show early signs of nausea and vomiting. These reactions are viewed as a way in which the body rejects unhealthy foods, which is linked with the view that disgust is an evolutionary adaptation to help humans avoid consuming toxic substances.
During sham feeding sessions of both appetizing and unappetizing foods, 3 cycles per minute (cpm) power was measured. During the sham feeding of appetizing foods, 3cpm power increased. This increase was not reported in the sham feeding of unappetizing foods. The researchers concluded that the presence of this pattern seems to mark the beginning of the body preparing for digestion, and the absence of this pattern in the disgust condition could indicate that the body is readying to reject the food. The increase of 3cpm power is also linked with increased saliva and digestive juice production, all of which support the idea that this reflex, called the cephalic-vagal reflex, is the precursor of digestion. The differential response to appetizing and unappetizing foods suggest that the body uses disgust as a cue to whether a food is good to eat and responds accordingly.
Another emotion with a bodily effect that can be measured by EGG is that of stress. When the body is stressed and engages in the fight-or-flight response, blood flow is directed to the muscles in the arms and legs and away from the digestive system. This loss of blood flow slows the digestive system, and this slowing can be seen on the EGG. However, this response can vary from person to person and situation to situation.
All of these examples are part of a larger theory of a brain–gut connection. This theory states that the vagus nerve provides a direct link between the brain and the gut so that emotions can affect stomach rhythms and vice versa. This idea originated in the mid-1800s when Alexis St. Martin, a man with a gunshot-induced fistula in his abdomen, experienced lower secretions of digestive juices and a slower stomach emptying when he was upset. In this case, the emotions St. Martin was feeling affected his physiological reaction, but the reverse can also be true. In a study with Crohn's disease patients where patients and unaffected controls watched happy, frightening, disgusting, and saddening films, patients with active Crohn's disease had more responsive EGG (a greater physiological response) and reported feeling more aroused when feeling the negative emotions of disgust or sadness. This leads researchers to believe that increased physiological activation can influence increased experience of emotions. Another study published in 1943 that studied the fistulated man Tom discovered that if "Tom was fearful or depressed his gastic activity decreased but when he was angry or hostile his gastric activity increased". This finding is contrasted by an EGG study by Ercolani et al. who had subjects perform either difficult or easy mental arithmetic or puzzles. They found that new tasks slowed down the myoelectrical activity of the stomach, suggesting that stress tends to impede gastric activity and that this can be picked up on an EGG. While there is still much research to be done on the brain-gut connection, research thus far has indeed shown that your stomach does indeed churn differently when you are emotionally aroused, and this could be the basis of the gut feeling that many people describe experiencing.
In recent years, some research has been done about gender differences in the perception and experience of disgust. One such study, upon presenting both male and female subjects with video clips designed to trigger disgust and found that although women reported feeling more disgust than men at these stimuli, the physiological responses did not show much difference. This could mean that, psychologically, women are more sensitive to disgust than men; however this assertion cannot be supported with physiological data. More research has to be done in this area to see if there are gender differences in the psychophysiological experience of disgust.
There are some limitations to the use of electrogastroenterography:
- the absence of a standard technique of performance peripheral electrogastroenterography,
- the absence of standard norms of electrophysiological parameters of bioelectric activity in the GT tract,
- the impossibility of an estimation of change of motility abnormalities during the concrete moments of time on local sites of GI tract.
Other updatings of electrogastrography
- 24-hour electrogastrography and electrogastroenterography.
- The joint electrogastroenterography with 24-hours pH-metry.
- Wavelet analysis of electrogastroenterogram.
- Telemetry capsule for the EGG monitoring in a stomach and an intestines.
Clinical applications of electrogastrography and gastroenterography
Electrogastrography or gastroenterography used when a patient is suspected of having a motility disorder, which can be shown, as recurrent nausea and vomiting, signs that the stomach is not emptying food normally. The clinical use of electrogastrography has been most widely evaluated in patients with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia.
- Stern, Robert Mitchell; Koch, Kenneth (2004). Handbook of electrogastrography. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-514788-X.
- Mintchev M. Selected Topics on Electrogastrography: Electrical phenomena in the human stomach.
- Kosenko P.M.; Vavrinchuk S.A. (2013). Electrogastroenterography in patients with complicated peptic ulcer disease (PDF). Yelm, WA, USA: Science Book Publishing House. p. 142. ISBN 978-1-62174-026-1.
- Alvarez W. C. (April 15, 1922). "The electrogastrogram and what it shows". J Am Med Assoc. 78 (15): 1116–19. doi:10.1001/jama.1922.02640680020008.
- Bowen R. (November 23, 1996). "Electrophysiology of Gastrointestinal Smooth Muscle". Retrieved February 12, 2008.
- Ginzburg G. V., Costoff A. "Gastrointestinal Physiology. Gastrointestinal Motility". GI Smooth Muscle Electrophysiology: Slow Waves (Basal Electric Rhythm). p. 5.
- Waldhausen, JH; Shaffrey, ME; Skenderis Bs, 2nd; Jones, RS; Schirmer, BD (June 1990). "Gastrointestinal myoelectric and clinical patterns of recovery after laparotomy". Ann. Surg. 211 (6): 777–84; discussion 785. doi:10.1097/00000658-199006000-00018. PMC 1358137. PMID 2357140.
- Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnett JL, Eaker EY; Hasler; Barnett; Eaker; American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force (April 2003). "Electrogastrography: a document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force". Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 15 (2): 89–102. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2982.2003.00396.x. PMID 12680908.
- Stendal, Charlotte (1997). Practical guide to gastrointestinal function testing. Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-04918-9.
- MediLexicon. Definitions of "Bradygastria" and "Tachygastria".
- Federal Register. Vol. 72, No. 148 /Thursday, August 2, 2007/ Proposed Rules, 42997.
- Stupin V. A., et al. Peripheral Electrogastroenterography in Clinical Practice // Лечащий Врач.-2005.-№ 2.-С. 60-62 (Russian).
- Rohrmann, Sonja; Hopp, Henrik, Quirin, Markus (2008). "Gender differences in psychophysiological responses to disgust". Journal of Psychophysiology 22 (2): 65–75. doi:10.1027/0269-8803.22.2.65.
- Meissner, Karin; Muth, Eric R.; Herbert, Beate M. (1 Oct 2010). "Bradygastic activity of the stomach predicts disgust sensitivity and perceived disgust intensity". Biological Psychology 86 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.09.014. PMID 20888886. Check date values in:
|year= / |date= mismatch(help)
- Stern, Robert M.; Jokerst, M.D.; Levine, M.E.; Koch, K.L. (April 2001). "The stomach's response to unappetizing food: cephalic-vagal effects on gastric myoelectric activity". Neurogastroenterology and Motility 13 (2): 151–154. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2982.2001.00250.x. PMID 11298993.
- Stern, Robert M.; Koch, Kenneth L; Levine, Max E.; Muth, Eric R. (2007). Cacioppo, John T., Tassinary, Louis G., Berntson, Gary G., ed. Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 211–230.
- Vianna, Eduardo P.M.; Weinstock, Joel, Elliot, David, Summers, Robert, Tranel, Daniel; Elliott, D; Summers, R; Tranel, D (2006). "Increased feelings with increased body signals". Scan 1 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl005. PMC 2555412. PMID 18985099.
- Ercolani, Mauro; Baldaro, Bruno, Trombini, Giancarlo; Trombini, Giancarlo (1989). "Effects of Two Tasks and Two Levels of Difficulty on Surface Electrogastrograms". Perceptual and Motor Skills 69 (1): 99–110. doi:10.2466/pms.1922.214.171.124. PMID 2780207.
- Vianna, E.P.M.; Tranel, D. (2006). "Gastric Myoelectrical Activity as an Index of Emotional Arousal". International Journal of Psychophysiology 61 (1): 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.019. PMID 16403424.
- Tokmakçi M (August 2007). "Analysis of the electrogastrogram using discrete wavelet transform and statistical methods to detect gastric dysrhythmia". J Med Syst 31 (4): 295–302. doi:10.1007/s10916-007-9069-9. PMID 17685154.
- Jung E.S., et al. Design and Implementation of the Telemetry Capsule for Measuring of Electrogastrography. Proceedings of the 24th IASTED international conference on Biomedical engineering. Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 209-213, 2006, ISBN 0-88986-578-7.