Jump to content

Extended evolutionary synthesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2001:56a:f2dc:8100:1d2f:43b6:e0f7:d91d (talk) at 06:42, 27 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on
Evolutionary biology
Darwin's finches by John Gould
Processes and outcomes
Natural history
History of evolutionary theory
Fields and applications
Social implications
Massimo Pigliucci, a leading proponent of the extended evolutionary synthesis.

The extended evolutionary synthesis is an extension of the Modern Synthesis of evolution which revisits the relative importance of different factors at play in evolutionary theory, revisits several assumptions of the original synthesis, and augments the modern synthesis with additional causative factors in evolution.[1][2]

The extended synthesis includes concepts and mechanisms such as multilevel selection theory, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, niche construction and evolvability.[3][4][5]

Early history

During the 1950s, biologist C. H. Waddington called for an extended synthesis based from his research on epigenetics and genetic assimilation.[6][7][8] An extended synthesis was also proposed by Rupert Riedl, with the study of evolvability.[9] In 1978, Michael J. D. White wrote about an extension of the modern synthesis based on new research from speciation.[10]

In the 1980s, Stephen Jay Gould argued for an extended synthesis. This was based on his idea of punctuated equilibrium, the role of species selection shaping large scale evolutionary patterns and natural selection working on multiple levels extending from genes to species.[11][12][13] Similar ideas were held by Niles Eldredge author of the book Unfinished Synthesis (1985).[14]

Ethologist John Endler wrote a paper in 1988 discussing processes of evolution that he felt had been neglected.[15] Others, such as researchers in the field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) called for an extended synthesis based on the opinion that the modern synthesis was mostly centered on genes and ignored the development of the organism, as well as morphological areas of biology.[16][17][18][19][20]

Recent

The extended synthesis is still a work-in-progress, essentially having been launched in 2007 by a paper by Massimo Pigliucci in the journal Evolution,[21] followed by a conference on the subject in 2008 at the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research.[22] The participants of the conference published a book in 2010 titled Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, which has served as a launching point for work on the extended synthesis.[23] Several of the topics included in the extended synthesis include:

Other processes such as evolvability, phenotypic plasticity, reticulate evolution and symbiogenesis are said by proponents to have been excluded or missed from the modern synthesis.[30][31]

The goal of the extended synthesis is to take evolution beyond the gene-centered approach of population genetics to consider more organism- and ecology-centered approaches. Many of these causes are currently considered secondary in evolutionary causation, and proponents of the extended synthesis want them to be considered first-class evolutionary causes.[32]

Biologist Eugene Koonin writing on the extended synthesis in 2009 wrote that "the new developments in evolutionary biology by no account should be viewed as refutation of Darwin. On the contrary, they are widening the trails that Darwin blazed 150 years ago and reveal the extraordinary fertility of his thinking."[33]

Reception

Several biologists have contended that there is no need for an extended synthesis because the modern synthesis is able to fully account for the newer observations, while advocates for the extended synthesis think that the conceptions of evolution at the core of the modern synthesis are too narrow.[34] Proponents of the extended synthesis think that even when the modern synthesis allows for the ideas in the extended synthesis, the modern synthesis, being used as a starting point, affects the way that biologists think about evolution. Proponents say that using terms and categories of the modern synthesis distort the picture of biology that modern experimentation has discovered.[35] Therefore, they claim that the extended synthesis is necessary to help expand the conceptions and framework of how evolution is considered throughout the biological disciplines.[2]

The ideas of the extended synthesis were positively reviewed by Anya Plutynski for the National Center for Science Education.[36]

References

  1. ^ Wade, Michael J. (2011). "The Neo-Modern Synthesis: The Confluence of New Data and Explanatory Concepts". BioScience 61: 407-408.
  2. ^ a b John Odling-Smee et al. "The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2015.
  3. ^ Danchin É, Charmantier A, Champagne FA, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, Blanchet S. (2011). "Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution". Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 475-486.
  4. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo; Finkelman, Leonard. "The Extended (Evolutionary) Synthesis Debate: Where Science Meets Philosophy". BioScience 64: 511-516.
  5. ^ a b Laubichler, Manfred D; Renn, Jürgen. (2015). "Extended evolution: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Regulatory Networks and Niche Construction". Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 324: 565–577.
  6. ^ Wilkins, Adam S. (2008). Waddington's Unfinished Critique of Neo-Darwinian Genetics: Then and Now. Biological Theory 3 (3):224-232.
  7. ^ Massimo Pigliucci et al. (2006). "Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation". Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 2362-2367.
  8. ^ Huang S. (2011). The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington’s epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-Darwinian biology? BioEssays 34: 149-157.
  9. ^ Wagner, Günter P; Laubichler; Manfred D. (2004). "Rupert Riedl and the Re-Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology: Body Plans and Evolvability". Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol) 302B: 92-102.
  10. ^ Parnell, Dennis R. (1978). Heralding a New Synthesis Modes of Speciation by M. J. D. White. Systematic Botany. Vol. 3, No. 1. p. 126.
  11. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay. (1980). Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging? Paleobiology. Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 119-130.
  12. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay. (1982). Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory. Science. New Series, Vol. 216, No. 4544. pp. 380-387.
  13. ^ "A More Modern Synthesis". American Scientist.
  14. ^ Vermeij, Geerat J. (1987). Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought by Niles Eldredge. The Quarterly Review of Biology. Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 79-80.
  15. ^ Endler, John A; McLellan, Tracy. (1988). The Processes of Evolution: Toward a Newer Synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. Vol. 19, pp. 395-421.
  16. ^ Bateson P. (2005). The Return of the Whole Organism. Journal of Biosciences 30: 31-39.
  17. ^ Huneman, Philippe. (2010). Assessing the Prospects for a Return of Organisms in Evolutionary Biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32: 341-372.
  18. ^ Gilbert S.F., Opitz G., Raff R. (1996). Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology. Development and Evolution 173: 357-372.
  19. ^ Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 943-949.
  20. ^ "The Origins of Form". Natural History.
  21. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2007). "Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?". Evolution. 61 (12): 2743–2749. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x. PMID 17924956.
  22. ^ Grant, Bob (1 January 2010). "Should Evolutionary Theory Evolve". The Scientist.
  23. ^ a b c Pigliucci (26 March 2010). Evolution - the Extended Synthesis. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262513678.
  24. ^ Meaden, Rhiannon (5 August 2015). "Redefining Evolutionary Biology". The Royal Society Publishing Blog.
  25. ^ Indiana University (7 August 2015). "Expanding the Theory of Evolution". Lab Manager.
  26. ^ Bonduriansky, R; Day, T. (2009). "Nongenetic inheritance and its evolutionary implications". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 40: 103-125.
  27. ^ Schrey; et al. (15 December 2011). "The Role of Epigenetic in Evolution: the Extended Synthesis". Genetics Research International. 2012: 286164. doi:10.1155/2012/286164. PMC 3335599. PMID 22567381.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  28. ^ Stotz, Karola (20 August 2014). "Extended evolutionary psychology: the importance of transgenerational developmental plasticity". Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 908. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00908. PMC 4138557. PMID 25191292.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  29. ^ Laland; et al. (5 August 2015). "The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions". The Royal Society Publishing Proceedings B. 282 (1813): 20151019. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1019. PMID 26246559.
  30. ^ Perez, JUlio E; Alfonsi, Carmen; Munoz, Carlos. (2010). "Towards a New Evolutionary Theory". Interciencia 35: 862-868.
  31. ^ Gontier, Nathalie. (2015). Reticulate Evolution Everywhere. In Reticulate Evolution: Symbiogenesis, Lateral Gene Transfer, Hybridization and Infectious Heredity. Springer. pp. 1-40. ISBN 978-3-319-16344-4
  32. ^ "Expanding Theory of Evolution". PhysOrg. 5 August 2015.
  33. ^ Koonin, Eugene. (2009). "Towards a postmodern synthesis of evolutionary biology". Cell Cycle 8: 799-800.
  34. ^ Laland; et al. (8 October 2014). "Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink?". Nature. 514 (7521): 161–164. Bibcode:2014Natur.514..161L. doi:10.1038/514161a. PMID 25297418.
  35. ^ Noble, Denis (1 January 2015). "Evolution Beyond Neo-Darwinism: A New Conceptual Framework". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 218 (Pt 1): 7–13. doi:10.1242/jeb.106310. PMID 25568446.
  36. ^ "Evolution: The Extended Synthesis". National Center for Science Education.

Further reading

Defend the extended synthesis

  • Arnold, Anthony J; Fristrup, Kurt. (1982). The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion. Paleobiology. Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 113–129.
  • Boto, Luis. (2010). "Horizontal Gene Transfer in Evolution: Facts and Challenges". Proc Biol Sci 277: 819-827.
  • Carroll, Sean B. (2008). Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution. Cell 134: 25-36.
  • Endler, John. (1986). The Newer Synthesis? Some Conceptual Problems in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 3: 224-243.
  • Gilbert, Scott F. (2000). "A New Evolutionary Synthesis". In Developmental Biology, 6th edition. Sinauer. ISBN 0-87893-243-7
  • Jablonka, Eva; Lamb, Marion J. (2008). Soft Inheritance: Challenging the Modern Synthesis. Genetics and Molecular Biology 31: 389-395.
  • Koonin, Eugene. (2009). "Towards a postmodern synthesis of evolutionary biology". Cell Cycle 8: 799-800.
  • Koonin, Eugene. (2009). "The Origin at 150: is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight?" Trends Genet 25: 473-475.
  • Müller, Gerd B. (2014). EvoDevo Shapes the Extended Synthesis. Biol Theory 9: 119-121.
  • Pennisi, Elizabeth. (2008). Modernizing the Modern Synthesis. Science 321: 196-197.
  • Postdarwinism: "The New Synthesis". A review of Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution, by Scott F. Gilbert and David Epel (Sinauer, 2009).
  • "Post-modern synthesis?" A review of Developmental Plasticity and Evolution by Mary Jane West-Eberhard (Oxford University Press, 2003).
  • Schrey et al. (2012). "The Role of Epigenetics in Evolution: The Extended Synthesis". Genetics Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 286164, 3 pages.
  • Weber, Bruce H. (2011). Extending and Expanding the Darwinian Synthesis: The Role of Complex Systems Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 42: 75-81.
  • Whitfield, John. (2008). "Biology theory: Postmodern evolution?" Nature 455: 281–284.

Criticism of the extended synthesis

  • Coyne, Jerry (November 24, 2014). "Does evolution need a revolution?". Why Evolution Is True (Blog). Retrieved 2015-11-19.
  • Craig, Lindsay. (2010). The So-Called Extended Synthesis and Population Genetics. Biological Theory 5: 117-123.
  • Dickens, Thomas; Rahman, Qazi. (2012). "The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution". Proceedings of the Royal Society: B biological sciences, 279 (1740). pp. 2913–2921.
  • Felsenstein, Joseph. (1986). Waiting for Post-Neo-Darwin. Evolution. Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 883–889.
  • Haig, David. (2007). Weismann rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian Temptation. Biology and Philosophy 22: 415-428.
  • Kurland CG, Canback B, Berg OG. (2003). "Horizontal Gene Transfer: A Critical View". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9658-9662.
  • Lynch, Michael. (2007). The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 8597-8604.
  • Mayr, Ernst. (2004). 80 years of watching the evolutionary scenery. Science 305: 46-47.
  • Merlin, Francesca. (2010). "Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis’ Consensus View". Philosophy & Theory in Biology 2: 22.
  • Stebbins, Ledyard G; Ayala, Francisco J. (1981). Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary? Science. New Series, Vol. 213, No. 4511. pp. 967–971.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extended_evolutionary_synthesis&oldid=712141653"