Falling and rising factorials: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 May 2024

12 May 2024

2 May 2024

11 April 2024

6 April 2024

5 April 2024

26 January 2024

21 January 2024

20 January 2024

5 January 2024

13 December 2023

4 September 2023

9 August 2023

26 July 2023

9 July 2023

3 July 2023

16 May 2023

  • curprev 18:1518:15, 16 May 2023JayBeeEll talk contribs 19,946 bytes +866 You cannot randomly change one formula in a sentence and think that the result will make sense if you do not take care of what the rest of the sentence says! I have made an effort to make this comprehensible. (Also remove annoying and pointless spacing kludges in LaTeX, and implement display="block instead of colon-indentation undo
  • curprev 16:3516:35, 16 May 2023202.164.136.157 talk 19,080 bytes +13 Changing the notation to literally match with the idea of rising factorial notation in the last line of the last paragraph of the introduction. undo

14 May 2023

23 April 2023

17 April 2023

11 April 2023

  • curprev 15:3715:37, 11 April 202383.174.183.250 talk 19,066 bytes +1 Whether the falling or rising formula is shown first should be consistent. It's incredibly confusing to the reader unfamiliar with the syntax to see the order swapped around in literally every example. I edited it so that the falling formula always comes first, to match the article name. undo Tag: Visual edit

6 March 2023

14 February 2023

22 January 2023

22 December 2022

14 December 2022

21 July 2022

25 June 2022

22 June 2022

14 May 2022

30 March 2022

25 March 2022

24 February 2022

31 January 2022

26 January 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)