Jump to content

Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 October 2024

31 July 2024

28 June 2024

19 June 2024

18 June 2024

  • curprev 00:0300:03, 18 June 2024 David Eppstein talk contribs 51,455 bytes −181 It is a single page, page 26-4, as shown in snippet form by https://books.google.com/books?id=OAwjAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Transmission+Systems+for+Communications+%22+%22Nyquist+Sampling+Theorem%22&dq=%22Transmission+Systems+for+Communications+%22+%22Nyquist+Sampling+Theorem%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwidn-Td7OOGAxWAOEQIHRPVBZAQ6AF6BAgJEAI undo
  • curprev 00:0000:00, 18 June 2024 David Eppstein talk contribs 51,636 bytes −75 fix mixed-up deadlink book/journal 1958/1959 cite undo

30 May 2024

25 May 2024

21 May 2024

7 May 2024

16 April 2024

25 March 2024

1 February 2024

4 January 2024

3 January 2024

2 January 2024

26 December 2023

18 December 2023

14 October 2023

7 September 2023

9 August 2023

7 August 2023

23 July 2023

12 July 2023

7 July 2023

20 June 2023

12 April 2023

29 March 2023

21 March 2023

19 February 2023

18 February 2023

  • curprev 19:3319:33, 18 February 2023 Jnez71 talk contribs 49,074 bytes +10 Theorem statement fails to explain that the sampling period doesn't need to be exactly 1/(2B), but instead can be anything faster than that. The sentence below the theorem had it correct already: "A sufficient sample-rate is therefore anything **larger than** 2B Hz." undo

5 February 2023

31 January 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)