College and university rankings in the United States
College and university rankings in the United States are rankings of U.S. colleges and universities ordered by contributing factors which vary depending on the organization performing the ranking. Rankings have most often been conducted by magazines, newspapers, websites, or academics. In addition to ranking entire institutions, specific programs, departments, and schools can be ranked. Some rankings consider measures of wealth, research excellence, selectivity, student options, eventual success, demographics, and other criteria. There is much debate about rankings' interpretation, accuracy, and usefulness. The expanding diversity in rating methodologies and accompanying criticisms of each indicate the lack of consensus in the field.
"30 Under 30"
Forbes compiles a list of 600 people—30 in each of 20 industries—described as "the brashest entrepreneurs across the United States and Canada," "trailblazers," "bold risk-takers," and "innovators" "shaking up some of the world’s stodgiest industries." Forbes then listed the schools that produced the most members on the 30 Under 30 list.
Council for Aid to Education
The Council for Aid to Education publishes a list of the top universities in terms of annual fundraising. Fundraising ability reflects, among other things, alumni and outside donors' views of the quality of a university, as well as the ability of that university to expend funds on top faculty and facilities. 2017 rankings list the top 3 as Harvard, Stanford, and Cornell.
Department of Education's College Scorecard
Beginning in 2015, the federal Department of Education has published a College Scorecard, which includes socio-economic diversity and SAT/ACT scores of the student body, graduation rates, and average earnings and debt of graduates at all colleges.
Forbes college rankings
In 2008, Forbes began publishing an annual list of "America's Best Colleges." Post-graduate success (self-reported salaries of alumni from PayScale and data from the Department of Education) constitutes 35% of the score. Student debt loads constitute 20% of the score. Student experience (retention rates reported by the Department of Education and data from Niche) constitutes 20% of the score. Graduation rates constitute 12.5% of the score. Academic success (using both the percentage of a school's student body that goes on to obtain doctorate degrees and those students who have won one of a diverse array of prestigious academic awards) constitutes 12.5%. Public reputation is not considered, which causes some colleges to score lower than in other lists. A three-year moving average is used to smooth out the scoring.
Forbes rated Princeton the country’s best college in its inaugural (2008) list. West Point took the top honor the following year. Williams College was ranked first both in 2010 and 2011, and Princeton returned to the top spot in 2012. In 2013 and 2016, Stanford occupied the No. 1 spot, with elite liberal arts schools Williams and Pomona College topping the rankings in the intervening years. Since 2017, the magazine has ranked Harvard as the best college in America.
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||4||5||4||4|
|University of Pennsylvania||7||7||7||6|
|California Institute of Technology||7||6||6||8|
|University of California, Berkeley||19||29||14||13|
|University of Chicago||17||16||18||16|
|University of Notre Dame||22||26||21||18|
|University of Michigan-Ann Arbor||27||38||22||20|
Niche's Best Colleges ranking focuses on academics, diversity, affordability, and student satisfaction.
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||1|
|California Institute of Technology||8|
|University of Pennsylvania||10|
The Princeton Review Dream Colleges
The Princeton Review annually asks students and parents what their dream college is, if cost and ability to get in were not factors.
|University||Students' Dream |
|University of California, Los Angeles||3|
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||4|
|New York University (NYU)||5|
|University of Michigan||9|
|University of California, Berkeley||10|
|University||Parents' Dream |
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||3|
|New York University (NYU)||5|
Social Mobility Index (SMI) rankings
The SMI rankings are a collaborative publication from CollegeNet and PayScale. The rankings aim to provide a measure of the extent to which colleges provide upward economic mobility to those that attend. The rankings were created in response to the finding in Science magazine which showed that among developed nations, the United States now provides the least economic opportunity and mobility for its citizens. The rankings were also created to combat the rising costs of tuition, much of which is attributed to the efforts of some colleges to increase their own fame and wealth in ways that increase their rank in media periodicals that put an emphasis on such measures. In 2014, according to the SMI, the top five colleges are Montana Tech, Rowan University, Florida A&M, Cal Poly Pomona, and Cal State Northridge.
The Top American Research Universities
The Center for Measuring University Performance has ranked American research universities in the Top American Research Universities since 2000. The methodology is based on data such as research publications, citations, recognitions and funding, as well as undergraduate quality such as SAT scores. The information used can be found in publicly accessible materials, reducing possibilities for manipulation. The methodology is generally consistent from year to year and changes are explained in the publication along with references from other studies.
UniversityBenchmarks Academic Rankings
The UniversityBenchmarks.com academic rankings focus on published public statistics for standardized test scores, grade inflation, population, dropout rate, research funding, and faculty recognition. These factors are normalized for the universities' undergraduate population using standard statistical practices. The relative overall rank of the university is derived from the average of the rankings.
|All Universities||Academic Ranking|
|California Institute of Technology||1|
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||5|
|Georgia Institute of Technology||6|
|Washington University in St. Louis||8|
|University of Chicago||10|
University Entrepreneur Report
The University Entrepreneur Report lists the top six American universities in terms of venture capital investments in businesses started by a university's alumni. According to a CB Insights study of deals from 2007–2011, Stanford alumni secured 203 venture capital or angel investments totaling $4.1 billion, just ahead of Harvard, with $3.8 billion among 112 deals. Berkeley, NYU, Penn, and MIT each brought in over $1.0 billion.
|University||Total value of venture capital
or angel investments
from 2007 to 2011 in billions USD
|Number of venture capital |
or angel investment deals
from 2007 to 2011
|University of California, Berkeley||1.3||90|
|New York University||1.2||48|
|University of Pennsylvania||1.2||46|
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||1.0||60|
U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking
In 1983, U.S. News & World Report published its first "America's Best Colleges" report. The rankings have been compiled and published annually since 1985 and are the most widely quoted of their kind in the United States.
The rankings are split into four categories: National Universities, Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges, with the latter two categories further split into North, South, Midwest, and West. The rankings are based upon data that U.S. News & World Report collects from an annual survey sent to each school, as well as opinion surveys of faculty members and administrators from other schools. The publication's methodology was created by Robert Morse, who continues to oversee its application as chief data strategist.
The rankings are popular with the general public (for their 2014 release,[needs update] usnews.com garnered 2.6 million unique visitors and 18.9 million page views in one day), and influence high school seniors' application patterns (a 2011 study found that a one-rank improvement leads to a 0.9% increase in number of applicants). However, they have been widely denounced by many higher education experts. Detractors argue that they ignore individual fit by comparing institutions with widely diverging missions on the same scale, imply a false precision by deriving an ordinal ranking from questionable data, encourage gamesmanship by institutions looking to improve their rank, and contribute to the admissions frenzy by unduly highlighting prestige.In addition to the rankings, U.S. News & World Report also publishes college guides in book form, and ranks American graduate schools and academic programs in a number of specific disciplines, including business, law, engineering, nursing, and medicine.
The Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College Rankings
The Wall Street Journal and Times Higher Education together release an annual ranking of U.S. colleges and universities. The ranking includes performance indicators such as teaching resources, academic reputation, and postgraduate prospects. The 2021 ranking is listed below:
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||2|
|Brown University||5 tied|
|Duke University||5 tied|
|California Institute of Technology||7 tied|
|Princeton University||7 tied|
Washington Monthly Rankings
Their top universities are:
|Top national universities||Rank||Top liberal arts colleges||Rank|
|Stanford University||1||Washington and Lee University||1|
|Harvard University||2||Harvey Mudd College||2|
|Massachusetts Institute of Technology||3||Amherst College||3|
|Yale University||4||Berea College||4|
|Duke University||5||Bowdoin College||5|
|University of Pennsylvania||6||Middlebury College||6|
|University of California, San Diego||7||Vassar College||7|
|Princeton University||8||Pomona College||8|
|Georgetown University||9||Wesleyan University||9|
|Texas A&M University||10||Claremont McKenna College||10|
"What will they Learn?" Report - American Council of Trustees and Alumni
In 2009, the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) began grading colleges and universities based on the strength of their general education requirements. In ACTA's annual What Will They Learn? report, colleges and universities are assigned a letter grade from "A" to "F" based on how many of seven subjects are required of students. The seven subjects are composition, mathematics, foreign language, science, economics, literature and American government or history. The 2011–2012 edition of What Will They Learn? graded 1,007 institutions. In the 2011–2012 edition, 19 schools received an "A" grade for requiring at least six of the subjects the study evaluated. ACTA's rating system has been endorsed by Mel Elfin, founding editor of U.S. News & World Report's rankings. The New York Times higher education blogger Stanley Fish, while agreeing that universities ought to have a strong core curriculum, disagreed with some of the subjects ACTA includes in the core.
Other rankings include the Fiske Guide to Colleges, Money, and Business Insider. Many specialized rankings are available in guidebooks, considering individual student interests, fields of study, geographical location, and affordability. In addition to best overall colleges ranking shown above, Niche also publishes dozens of specialized rankings such as Best Academics, Best Campus Food, Most Conservative Colleges, and Best Technology.
Among the rankings dealing with individual fields of study is the Philosophical Gourmet Report or "Leiter Report", a ranking of philosophy departments. This report has attracted criticism from different viewpoints. Notably, practitioners of continental philosophy, who perceive the Leiter report as unfair to their field, have compiled alternative rankings.
The Gourman Report, last published in 1996, ranked the quality of undergraduate majors and graduate programs. The Daily Beast has also, in the past, published rankings. In 2015, The Economist published a one-time ranking emphasizing the difference between the expected and actual earnings of alumni.
The Higher Education Rankings, developed and managed by the New York City consulting company IV Research, is a commercial product that provides both general rankings as well as personalized rankings based on a complicated assessment of 6 criteria and 30 indicators.
Global Language Monitor produces a "TrendTopper MediaBuzz" ranking of the Top 300 United States colleges and universities semi-annually. It publishes overall results for both university and college categories. It uses the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching's classifications to distinguish between universities and liberal arts colleges. The rankings list 125 universities, 100 colleges, the change in the rankings over time, a "Predictive Quantities Indicator" (PQI) Index number (for relative rankings), rankings by Momentum (yearly and 90-day snapshots), and rankings by State. The most recent ranking appeared on November 1, 2009, covering 2008. The PQI index is produced by Global Language Monitor's proprietary PQI algorithm, which has been criticized by some linguists for its use in a counting of the total number of English words. The Global Language Monitor also sells the TrendTopper MediaBuzz Reputation Management solution[buzzword] for higher education for which "colleges and universities can enhance their standings among peers". The Global Language Monitor states that it "does not influence the Higher Education rankings in any way".
The Princeton Review annually publishes a book of Best Colleges. In 2011, this was titled The Best 373 Colleges. Phi Beta Kappa has also sought to establish chapters at the best schools, lately numbering 280.
In terms of collegiate sports programs, the annual NACDA Directors' Cup provides a measure of all-around collegiate athletic team achievement. Stanford has won the Division I Directors' cup for the last 22 years in a row.
American college and university ranking systems have drawn criticism from within and outside higher education in Canada and the United States. Institutions that have objected include Reed College, Alma College, Mount Holyoke College, St. John's College, Earlham College, MIT, Stanford University, University of Western Ontario, and Queen's University.
Some higher education experts, like Kevin Carey of Education Sector, have argued that U.S. News & World Report's college rankings system is merely a list of criteria that mirrors the superficial characteristics of elite colleges and universities. According to Carey, "[The] U.S. News ranking system is deeply flawed. Instead of focusing on the fundamental issues of how well colleges and universities educate their students and how well they prepare them to be successful after college, the magazine's rankings are almost entirely a function of three factors: fame, wealth, and exclusivity." He suggested more important characteristics are how well students are learning and how likely students are to earn a degree.
On 19 June 2007, during the annual meeting of the Annapolis Group, members discussed a letter to college presidents asking them not to participate in the "reputation survey" section of the U.S. News survey (this section comprises 25% of the ranking). As a result, "a majority of the approximately 80 presidents at the meeting said that they did not intend to participate in the U.S. News reputational rankings in the future." However, the decision to fill out the reputational survey was left to each individual college. The statement stated that its members "have agreed to participate in the development of an alternative common format that presents information about their colleges for students and their families to use in the college search process." This database was outlined and developed in conjunction with higher education organizations including theNational Association of Independent Colleges and Universities and the Council of Independent Colleges.
U.S. News & World Report editor Robert Morse issued a response on 22 June 2007, stating:
"in terms of the peer assessment survey, we at U.S. News firmly believe the survey has significant value because it allows us to measure the "intangibles" of a college that we can't measure through statistical data. Plus, the reputation of a school can help get that all-important first job and plays a key part in which grad school someone will be able to get into. The peer survey is by nature subjective, but the technique of asking industry leaders to rate their competitors is a commonly accepted practice. The results from the peer survey also can act to level the playing field between private and public colleges."
In reference to the alternative database discussed by the Annapolis Group, Morse argued:
"It's important to point out that the Annapolis Group's stated goal of presenting college data in a common format has been tried before ... U.S. News has been supplying this exact college information for many years already. And it appears that NAICU will be doing it with significantly less comparability and functionality.U.S. News first collects all these data (using an agreed-upon set of definitions from the Common Data Set). Then we post the data on our website in easily accessible, comparable tables. In other words, the Annapolis Group and the others in the NAICU initiative actually are following the lead of U.S. News."
Knowing that universities—and, in most cases, the statistics they submit—change little from one year to the next, I can only conclude that what are changing are the formulas the magazine's number massagers employ. And, indeed, there is marked evidence of that this year. In the category "Faculty resources," even though few of us had significant changes in our faculty or student numbers, our class sizes, or our finances, the rankings' producers created a mad scramble in rank order [... data ...]. Then there is "Financial resources," where Stanford dropped from #6 to #9, Harvard from #5 to #7. Our resources did not fall; did other institutions' rise so sharply? I infer that, in each case, the formulas were simply changed, with notification to no one, not even your readers, who are left to assume that some schools have suddenly soared, others precipitously plummeted.
- "Presenting 30 Under 30 The 2019".
- Davis, Dominic-Madori. "The 10 colleges that have produced the most Forbes 30 Under 30 honorees this year". Business Insider. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
- Coudriet, Carter. "The Top Schools—And Student Debt Stories—Of The 2019 30 Under 30 Class". Forbes. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
- "Top Fundraisers" (PDF). Retrieved 26 March 2018.[permanent dead link]
- "College Scorecard". U.S. Department of Education.
- "America's Top Colleges". Forbes. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
- "America's Best Colleges 2008". Forbes. 13 August 2008. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- "America's Best Colleges 2009". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Noer, Michael (3 August 2011). "America's Top Colleges". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Goldstein, Rachel (5 August 2011). "Williams College Takes Top Spot in Forbes' University Rankings". Time. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- "Forbes Publishes Rankings of America's Top Colleges: Princeton University is No. 1". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Howard, Caroline. "America's Top Colleges 2013". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Howard, Caroline. "America's Top Colleges 2014". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Howard, Caroline (29 July 2015). "America's Top Colleges Ranking 2015". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Bravo, Kristina (30 July 2015). "Pomona College is No. 1 on Forbes list of best in US". Southern California Public Radio. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Rand, Jory (30 July 2015). "Forbes ranks Pomona College as top college in US". ABC7 Los Angeles. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- Howard, Caroline. "America's Top Colleges 2016". Forbes. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- "America's Top Colleges 2019". www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2020-08-15.
- "Here Are America's Top Colleges for 2018". www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2018-08-21.
- "Forbes Releases Tenth Annual Rankings of America's Top Colleges". www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2017-08-02.
- "Niche Best Colleges".
- "Top 10 "Dream Colleges"". Retrieved 2 April 2020.
- "Social Mobility Index". CollegeNet and Payscale. Retrieved October 21, 2014.
- "The Top American Research Universities". The Center for Measuring University Performance. Archived from the original on 2012-06-17. Retrieved 2009-08-23.
- UniversityBenchmarks 2016 University Academic Rankings
- The University Entrepreneur Report.
- Leiby, Richard; Leiby, Richard (9 September 2014). "The U.S. News college rankings guru" – via washingtonpost.com.
- "U.S. News Pulls Social Levers to Break Records for 'Best Colleges' Package - min Online". 19 September 2013. Archived from the original on 23 January 2015.
- Luca, Michael; Smith, Jonathan (27 September 2011). "Salience in Quality Disclosure: Evidence from the U.S. News College Rankings". Leadership and Management. Archived from the original on 7 November 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
- Gladwell, Malcolm (7 February 2011). "The Trouble with College Rankings". The New Yorker. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Strauss, Valerie. "Analysis | U.S. News changed the way it ranks colleges. It's still ridiculous". Washington Post. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Breslow, Samuel (26 September 2014). "The Case Against Being (Ranked) the Best". The Student Life. Archived from the original on 25 February 2017. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Jaschik, Scott (10 September 2018). "'U.S. News' says it has shifted rankings to focus on social mobility, but has it?". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- "Amazon's listings of U.S. News "College Guides"". Retrieved 2015-01-17.
- "Graduate School Rankings". Archived from the original on 2017-02-23.
- "National Universities". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
- "Liberal Arts Colleges". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- "The Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College Rankings 2021". timeshighereducation.com. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
- "The Washington Monthly's Annual College Guide" Archived 2007-07-18 at the Wayback Machine
- "Washington Monthly's National Universities Rankings". The Washington Monthly. Retrieved 2017-01-05.
- "Washington Monthly's Liberal Arts College Rankings". The Washington Monthly. Retrieved 2016-02-06.
- ACTA. "What Will They Learn?". Archived from the original on 2 December 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2010.
- "ACTA Gives College Highest Possible Academic Ranking". Thomas Aquinas College. September 1, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2012.
- McGurn, William (November 1, 2011). "What's Your Kid Getting From College?". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 9, 2012.
- Daniel L. Bennett (19 August 2009). "What Will They Learn?". Center for College Affordability and Productivity. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
- Stanley Fish (24 August 2009). "What Should Colleges Teach?". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
- Founded by Brian Leiter then of the University of Texas at Austin, now[update] University of Chicago
- IVRI. "Overview & Methodology". Archived from the original on 2015-09-05. Retrieved 10 September 2012.
- "Harvard Number One University in Eyes of Public". Gallup.com. 2003-08-26. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
- "College Rankings". Global Language Monitor. Archived from the original on 2009-11-11. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
- "PQI". Global Language Monitor. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
- Goldsmith, Belinda (2009-06-10). Fahmy, Miral (ed.). Web 2.0 crowned one millionth English word. Los Angeles, CA: Reuters. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
- Zimmer, Benjamin (2009-01-03). "The "million word" hoax rolls along". Language Log, Linguistic Data Consortium. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
- Walker, Ruth (2009-01-02). "Save the date: English nears a milestone". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
- Sutter, John D. (2009-06-10). "English gets millionth word on Wednesday, site says". CNN. Retrieved 2009-11-03. Cite journal requires
- "TrendTopper enhances college reputation". Global Language Monitor. Retrieved 2009-11-03.
- "College Rankings". The Global Language Monitor. Retrieved 2009-11-10.[dead link]
- "PBK.org". Archived from the original on 2012-02-13. Retrieved 2011-04-26.
- "Stanford Nabs Another Directors' Cup". Retrieved 15 June 2016.
- Carey, Kevin. "College Rankings Reformed". educationsector.org Archived 2009-08-23 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved July 28, 2009.
- Jaschik, Scott (20 June 2007). "More Momentum Against 'U.S. News'". Inside Higher Ed.
- "Annapolis group statement on rankings and ratings". Annapolis Group. 19 June 2007.
- Morse, Robert (22 June 2007). "About the Annapolis Group's Statement". U.S. News and World Report. Archived from the original on 2 July 2007.
- "Criticism of College Rankings – September 23, 1996". Stanford.edu. 1996-09-23. Retrieved 2010-06-08.