Redrup v. New York
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Redrup v. New York|
|Argued October 10–11, 1966|
Decided May 8, 1967
|Full case name||Robert Redrup, Petitioners v. State of New York; William L. Austin, Petitioner v. State of Kentucky; Gent, et al., Appellants v. State of Arkansas|
|Citations||386 U.S. 767 (more)|
|Written materials that were not sold to minors, or foisted on unwilling audiences were constitutionally protected.|
|Dissent||Harlan, joined by Clark|
Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967), was a May 8, 1967 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States, widely regarded as the end of American censorship of written fiction. Robert Redrup was a Times Square newsstand clerk who sold two of William Hamling's Greenleaf Classics paperback pulp sex novels, Lust Pool and Shame Agent, to a plainclothes police officer. He was tried and convicted in 1965.
With financial backing from Hamling, Redrup appealed his case to the Supreme Court where his conviction was overturned by 7-2. The court's final ruling affirmed that written materials that were neither sold to minors nor foisted on unwilling audiences were constitutionally protected, thereby de facto ending American censorship of written material. After this decision, the Supreme Court systematically and summarily reversed, without further opinion, scores of obscenity rulings involving paperback sex books.
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 386
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court
- List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
- Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
- Hagle, Timothy M. (1991). "But Do They Have to See It to Know It? The Supreme Court's Obscenity and Pornography Decisions". The Western Political Quarterly. University of Utah. 44 (4): 1039&ndash, 1054. doi:10.2307/448806. JSTOR 448806.
- Kobylka, Joseph F. (1987). "A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation: Libertarian Groups and Obscenity". The Journal of Politics. Cambridge University Press. 49 (4): 1061&ndash, 1078. doi:10.2307/2130784. JSTOR 2130784.
- Works related to Redrup v. New York at Wikisource
- Text of Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967), is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
|This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|