Redrup v. New York
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nellis (talk | contribs) at 16:49, 12 May 2016 (add Harlan's dissent to infobox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Redrup v. New York" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Redrup v. New York | |
---|---|
Argued October 10–11, 1966 Decided May 8, 1967 | |
Full case name | Robert Redrup, Petitioners v. State of New York; William L. Austin, Petitioner v. State of Kentucky; Gent, et al., Appellants v. State of Arkansas |
Citations | 386 U.S. 767 (more) |
Holding | |
Written materials that were not sold to minors, or foisted on unwilling audiences were constitutionally protected. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Per curiam | |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Clark |
Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967) was a May 8, 1967 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States, widely regarded as the end of American censorship of written fiction. Robert Redrup was a Times Square newsstand clerk who sold two of William Hamling's Greenleaf Classics paperback pulp sex novels, Lust Pool and Shame Agent, to a plainclothes police officer. He was tried and convicted in 1965.
With financial backing from Hamling, Redrup appealed his case to the Supreme Court where his conviction was overturned by 7-2. The court's final ruling affirmed that written materials that were neither sold to minors nor foisted on unwilling audiences were constitutionally protected, thereby de facto ending American censorship of written material. After this decision, the Supreme Court systematically and summarily reversed, without further opinion, scores of obscenity rulings involving paperback sex books.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 386
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court
- List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
- Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
References
Further reading
- Hagle, Timothy M. (1991). "But Do They Have to See It to Know It? The Supreme Court's Obscenity and Pornography Decisions". The Western Political Quarterly. 44 (4). University of Utah: 1039–1054. doi:10.2307/448806. JSTOR 448806.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=
and|coauthors=
(help) - Kobylka, Joseph F. (1987). "A Court-Created Context for Group Litigation: Libertarian Groups and Obscenity". The Journal of Politics. 49 (4). Cambridge University Press: 1061–1078. doi:10.2307/2130784. JSTOR 2130784.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=
and|coauthors=
(help)
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- Articles needing additional references from August 2013
- All articles needing additional references
- Articles with short description
- Short description matches Wikidata
- Articles containing Latin-language text
- Pages using infobox US Supreme Court case with unknown parameters
- CS1 errors: empty unknown parameters
- All stub articles