Rubidium-82 chloride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bender the Bot (talk | contribs) at 06:19, 25 September 2016 (http→https for Google Books and Google News using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rubidium-82 chloride
Names
IUPAC name
Rubidium-82 chloride
Systematic IUPAC name
(82Rb)Rubidium chloride
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChemSpider
KEGG
  • InChI=1S/ClH.Rb/h1H;/q;+1/p-1/i;1-3 checkY
    Key: FGDZQCVHDSGLHJ-RYDPDVNUSA-M checkY
  • [Cl-].[82Rb+]
Properties
ClRb
Molar mass 117.371 g mol−1
Pharmacology
V09GX04 (WHO)
Related compounds
Other cations
Caesium chloride

Lithium chloride
Potassium chloride
Rubidium chloride
Sodium chloride

Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).

Rubidium-82 chloride is a form of rubidium chloride using a radioactive isotope of rubidium. It is marketed under the brand name Cardiogen-82 (Bracco Diagnostics) in the use of Myocardial perfusion imaging (imaging of the heart).[1] It is rapidly taken up by heart muscle cells, and therefore can be used to identify regions of heart muscle that are receiving poor blood flow in a technique called PET perfusion imaging.[2] The half-life of the rubidium-82 is only 1.27 minutes; it is normally produced at the place of use by rubidium generators.[3]

References

  1. ^ Th Wackers, Frans J; Bruni, Wendy; Zaret, Barry L (2007-11-19). "Rubidium-82 Generator". Nuclear cardiology: the basics : how to set up and maintain a laboratory. ISBN 978-1-58829-924-6.
  2. ^ Ballinger, James R. (2009). "Integrating Cardiology for Nuclear Medicine Physicians": 379–385. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78674-0_32. ISBN 978-3-540-78673-3. {{cite journal}}: |chapter= ignored (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ K. L. Gould et al. "Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1986;7:775-789. [1]

Further reading