Talk:Édouard Ducpétiaux

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edouard Ducpétiaux → Édouard Ducpétiaux – per WP:FRMOS and sources including Historical Dictionary of Brussels. --Relisted Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC) In ictu oculi (talk) 06:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is messed up, one of the sources says "DUCPÉTIAUX, ANTOINE-ÉDOUARD", another says "Édouard Antoine Ducpétiaux". -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, :) heaven knows what Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon 1908 from a Russian website is doing as a source anyway. Confirmed English source with French source Bruxelles 2000 Page 76. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Purely a styling matter (a famous one!); and resolved on Wikipedia by provisions at WP:FRMOS, as the proposer notes. Noetica^Tea? 01:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support; if that's the spelling used by the best sources, it's quite straightforward. bobrayner (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- the correct diacritricals should normally be used. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.