Jump to content

Talk:Adityas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Ādityas)

File:The Genealogy of Bharata.png Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:The Genealogy of Bharata.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 16 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The Genealogy of Bharata.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya not only arrived from Aditi

[edit]

Aditya is noch only to arrive from Aditi (the earth) but also from A-Daitya meaning: not Daitya which is the following generation of gods (by the greeks called titans, the egaptians call them Nertheru). The meaning is therefore also that the Adityas (as Mithra, Varuna, Surya a.s.o.) belong to a former generation of gods.--62.153.17.13 (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compare Vayu Purana 2.6.16 ff.--80.147.61.150 (talk) 10:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

@Redtigerxyz: we should move this page to Adityas as per your suggestion on Talk: Saraswati. Bṛhaspati should be move to Brihaspati..245CMR.👥📜 15:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Adityas used without discritics
    • Encyclopedia of Hinduism by Constance A. Jones and James D. Ryan
    • Britannica

Bṛhaspati is tricky - Talk:Bṛhaspati#Requested_move. ऋ is disputed and can be transliterated as i or u; though I prefer Brihaspati in line with Krishna, Rishi. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number 57 20:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


ĀdityasAdityas – As a suggestion, primary transliteration/ simplified transliteration is preferred to formal transliteration (like IAST/ ISO). Most RS which used simplified english use Aditya. Examples are given by Redtigerxyz:

  • Support Adityas used without discritics
    • Encyclopedia of Hinduism by Constance A. Jones and James D. Ryan
    • Britannica
      — User: Redtigerxyz, originally answered on Talk:Ādityas#Name

--.245CMR.👥📜 12:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indra is not a name!

[edit]

Indra is not a name but a title (king of the gods), belonging to different persons at different times. For example in Rigveda 4.42.3 Varuna calls himselve Indra (therefore the name of the hymn should be Indra Varuna instead of Indra and Varuna), which according to the Puranas in the Tretayuga was the case. 2003:F5:F710:CB00:6CFF:3FC9:145A:2A1A (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the Adityas refer to the gods of the tvelve signs of the zodiac in the Tretayuga (which changed in the Dvaparayuga at which time most of the hymns of the Rigveda are conposed), the question arises, wether Indra also refers to a constellation. From Rigveda 6.17.1 it seems that the constellation Hercules could be meant. Of course this is (today?) not a constellation of the zodiac, but maybe this is the meaning of Rigveda 6.17.4a (Jameson & Brereton translation). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F5:F710:CB00:6CFF:3FC9:145A:2A1A (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]