Jump to content

Talk:1922 Picardie mid-air collision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aviastar

[edit]

The ref to aviastar was removed as contributory infringement per WP:EL, yet without indication of what source work is said to be infringed. If there's a track record of such infringement at that site, a link would be helpful. The site lists an extensive bibliography, though it does not provide citations on its individual articles. The most obviously related book in the list would be:

Jackson, Aubrey Joseph. De Havilland Aircraft since 1909 London: Putnam (1987) ISBN 9780851778020

If someone can check that book it would be helpful. WorldCat shows it as fairly widely held in libraries. User:LeadSongDog come howl 13:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cause and effect

[edit]

Nice to see we have an article on this important early accident. What is missing is the cause and the changes made to air navigation rules afterwards.

As I understand it, both aircraft were following a road or railway line for navigation. The British aircraft was keeping to the left of the feature, and the French aircraft was keeping to the right, thus placing them both on the same side of the road/railway going in opposite directions. As a direct result of the accident, the rule was adapted from maritime practice of "pass port-to-port", or keeping a road or railway to one's left when following it as a navigational aid. I'm sure I've read this in a book on aviation accidents, but am not sure which one. If anyone can reference this before I can find the source, please add it to the article. Mjroots (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to find a ref for this by accident, now added to the article. Mjroots (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Title

[edit]

This article needs a new title as "first mid-air collision of airliners" does not follow the system for the rest of aircraft incidents without flight numbers. I would suggest something like "Mid-air collision of 7 April 1922" or "Picardie mid-air collision" or some variation thereof. -Noha307 (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No reason why it cant be an exception for what was a first. MilborneOne (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1922 Picardie mid-air collision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]