Talk:1972 Nixon visit to China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China / History (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (marked as Top-importance).

Why did Nixon recognize China over Taiwan? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs) .

  • Nixon and the U.S. government agreed to recognize China over Taiwan mainly to settle the dispute and peacefully agree with China themselves to open trade and commerce with mainland China. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė

Add an effects section?

Nixon and Trudeau?[edit]

Perhaps a mention about Trudeau's visit to China should be added, as it's closely related to Nixon's. - 21:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

nixon liked pie!


This article is far too brief! Get with the program, people!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liushaoqi (talkcontribs) 00:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hong Kong and Macau[edit]

This section really doesn't belong here. I suggest it be removed. Cripipper (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Why not just make a post-meeting section? Where else would info like this belong? Benjwong (talk) 19:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Because this had nothing to do with the Nixon visit. It belongs in the history of Hong Kong. Cripipper (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean? If not for this visit, there would be no dialogue. Benjwong (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean by dialogue? Cripipper (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

UN Recognition of PRC[edit]

Why is this not mentioned ? The changeover occurred 25th October 1971. Wasn't Nixon responding to force majeure from the UN ? ie he had no choice but to go to China.

"On 15 July 1971, 17 UN members requested that a question of the "Restoration of the lawful rights of the People's Republic of China in the United Nations" be placed on the provisional agenda of the twenty-sixth session of the UN General Assembly, claiming that the PRC, a "founding member of the United Nations and a permanent member of the Security Council, had since 1949 been refused by systematic maneuvers the right to occupy the seat to which it is entitled ipso jure"."

This is from UN_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758

Whitlam in China[edit]

Perhaps Whitlam's visit to China should also be mentioned. In Australia this was at first seen as a Labor Prime Minister being soft on Communism (a common accusation from their political opponents in the 70's). But after Nixon went it was seen as ok. It has been suggested by a few historians and academics that Whitlam went to test the waters for Nixon. Also, the lead of this article doesn't really summarise the significance of this event very well. For many it is considered the point at which the Sino-Soviet split allowed the USA to use China to contain the USSR. Basically this was the turning point geopolitically that ended the Cold War if this theory is to be believed. Not the meeting precisely, but the resumption of friendly diplomacy, trade etc. certainly helped strengthen the USA and China and weakened the USSR considerably.--Senor Freebie (talk) 05:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

What is the significance?[edit]

Can somebody explain the significance of the sentence 'Upon their meeting, Mao's first words to Nixon were: "Yesterday in the airplane you put forth a very difficult problem for us." '

That is sentence is made into a separate paragraph, but it needs clarifying because I don't understand the point of it. Rodchen (talk) 08:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

It should read, "Our common old friend, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, doesn't approve of this." That's a famous quotation. An anonymous account changed it without comment. Thanks for catching it. I've fixed it now.   Will Beback  talk  19:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

That makes more sense. I could not figure it out. I don't know how that could have gotten changed except vandelism, but that doesn't seem like vandelism. Rodchen (talk) 08:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Max Frankel[edit]

Why does this article mention Max Frankel's Pulitzer? The mention can be in Max Frankel's page, but doesn't belong here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konetidy (talkcontribs) 14:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)