Talk:2012 (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good article2012 (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2011Good article nomineeListed
October 4, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconA version of this article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 2, 2016. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 

What?[edit]

  "When the group arrive in China, the plane runs out of fuel and everyone leaves through a Bentley Continental Flying Spur. Sasha is killed as the plane falls down a mountain and explodes."

This makes no sense to someone who hasn't seen the film. The plane, presumably in flight, runs out of fuels and "everyone leaves through a Bentley Continental"? What, they climb through it to escape from the plane? They drive off the plane in the Bentley? or is the plane landed, and the passengers disembark in a Bentley (must not have been many passengers then, for such a big plane...what about the flight crew?). If it is already landed, they how the hell does the plane "fall down a mountain and explode"? Are the mountains collapsing? Why is the person still onboard? AnnaGoFast (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Made some changes; hopefully it's more clear now. DonIago (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2012 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2012 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made[edit]

I think there should be at least some mention of how bad the science is in this movie. NASA experts voted it the most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made in a conference held at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, in 2011 [1]. Robert Walker (talk) 08:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

The page isn't protected, so why not go ahead and add it? DonIago (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)