Talk:2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee 2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
November 28, 2014 Good article nominee Not listed
April 27, 2015 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Former good article nominee
WikiProject College Basketball (Rated Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of College Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Michigan  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 22, 2015. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 

Failing Article[edit]

@Biblioworm: The GA review was done correctly but next time, you should put it on hold. It would look like |status=onhold. I recommend you revert your edit and place the article on hold. Most of the issues can be fixed quite quickly. After the issues are addressed, pass it. And after a 7 day period, and they haven't been addressed, you can fail it. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 01:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

@TheQ Editor: Yes check.svg Done --Biblioworm 03:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
@Biblioworm: - just fixed it for Talk:Mersea Island/GA1. It's a shame the review here failed, as TonyTheTiger is a highly experienced writer and GA reviewer, and would have hopefully come to consensus eventually. I find if you need a second opinion, it's best to have a few experienced editors you trust and just ping them, as using the "second opinion" in the GA review process can take considerable time for someone to come forward, particularly if the article is lengthy or the subject is obscure. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
You're probably right, but I really don't have a "trusted editor group" yet. --Biblioworm 19:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
@Biblioworm:, I didn't try to argue too much, but given that I have GAed 2008–09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2010–11 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2011–12 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, and 2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, you could have worked with me on this one. Now, two editors are saying you probably shouldn't have jumped to fail this. You might again consider reverting. I am fairly certain any problems you find, I can correct although you have the right to say the required input for a list of concerns would be too extensive.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Since it seems that I was a little "too quick on the draw", I'll try to go hunt down an experienced GAN reviewer who knows about basketball and get their opinion on it. --Biblioworm 15:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)