Talk:2013 San Diego Padres season

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject San Diego Padres.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

San Diego

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Updates[edit]

Bagumba, if I get a chance or when I'm motivated to, I'll still help [you] with updating this article. Or at least I'll try. Most of the info I'll get "at a glance" from this source: [1] 99.129.112.89 (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Be bold!—Bagumba (talk) 07:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts[edit]

You don't undo everything just because a source is in the heading. Those are that way all over Wikipedia. Simply move it then. The "copy" issue does not apply here. I typed those up myself and the others are simple stats, list of players/transactions, etc. This is obviously a personal jab at me. I mean, seriously? Here and the other MLB articles I did? The entry is fine. If anything, you should argue that Wikipedia isn't a place for facts, lists, news, etc. Let's see... no discussion, no concensus, unproductive/disruptive, etc. Real nice. 99.129.112.89 (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in headings are not all over wikipedia, and if they are, they are incorrect.

But you do immediately remove cut and paste copyright violations, no discussion, no "consensus" needed -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it's sourced, it can't be closely WP:PARAPHRASE. WP:OTHERSTUFF is only valid if the rationale behind the other stuff is reasonable.—Bagumba (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are like that all over wikipedia. And what was text is sourced. All I'd have to do is type "according to". You are causing disruptions and removing good edits. All sports stats are "copyright". A game that has a score of 1-9 can't be typed differently. A player put on the disabled list or aquired can't be typed otherwise. It's more nonsense... I know why you've removed it. I don't care though, it affects me 0%. 99.129.112.89 (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't care, why have you spent the past few hours trying to start a war? AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 23:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Tigers won, 9-1." "Scoring only 1 run, the Padres lost to the Tigers who scored 9 runs." "In a 9 to 1 victory, the Tigers moved to third place in the division." "Smith held the Padres to one run in the Tiger's 9-1 victory."

You cannot copyright stats, but you were not just inputting stats, you were cutting and pasting large chunks of intact text. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinions. That is not true. So gang up on me [again] because I'm defending myself on a talk page. You don't have to like it, but the war started with someone clearly removing my content after a lost dispute. Go ahead and have the final word though, I won't return. Very petty, so I'll take the high road and stay classy! :) 99.129.112.89 (talk) 23:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How many times have you said that now? I don't know what has precipitated all of this, and I'm not sure that you don't have a legitimate gripe. However, I will say that you have gone about stating your gripe in almost as poor of a manner as possible. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 23:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not really wanting to get into this, but the transaction listing is a questionable thing for a cut and paste violation as thats mostly just factual data that really is only said one way in lists like that... optioned so and so to the minors, placed so and so on the DL... etc... The highlights stuff was probably too close so that was rightly removed. A better way to do the transaction list is to find individual sources for each transaction rather than copying a transaction log from espn.. team writers probably wrote articles on each event so it shouldn't be hard to do. Spanneraol (talk) 00:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]