Jump to content

Talk:West Fertilizer Company explosion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Other events at same time

[edit]

What I recall about the incident is that it was one of a series of major news stories in less than a week. Each one was an exercise in "can you top this?" I am not sure how these would be linked together in the article. Perhaps gathering them together on this Talk page would be good enough for a start. As I type this, I am not remembering the details, only that there was such a sequence.

Typofixer76 (talk) 03:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This would seem to be original research. Unless there is an external source which has made any sort of notable connection between these events, we don't really have cause to discuss them in this manner. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with NorthBySouthBaranof. --Wuerzele (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article's title

[edit]

I recently reinstated the WP:COMMONNAME title which this article uses. It would not be an uncontested move; requiring therefore: discussion. Calling it West Fertilizer Company disaster is not at all common, in fact uncommon, and at odds with references that state it has been " denied disaster relief ".[1] I'd insist to see a consensus on such a page move at this time. Cheers.—John Cline (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I also found a source that could support the other title;[2] though I am still in favor of the current name.—John Cline (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has happened

[edit]

@Wuerzele: Why is it necessary to report that nothing occurred? Should the article on the sky have a sentence informing us that the sky is not green? Brycehughes (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objections to removing the sentence? Brycehughes (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's not telling us the sky is not green. It's like saying the plane crashed and nobody died. It happens sometimes, but sometimes it doesn't happen, and it's important to clarify which case it was. If this sentence wasn't there, readers might just think the article hadn't been updated with followups, as often happens.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why would they think that? The subsequent sentence says something happened. So right now it reads, nothing happened, and then something happened. We can assume the former from the latter. Brycehughes (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 12 external links on West Fertilizer Company explosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kiloton Yield

[edit]

The kiloton yield in the article right now appears to be wrong and isn't backed by any of the sources. I'm going to do some back-of-the-envelope and 'fix' it. If anyone feels the need to undo my 'fix' as original research, please at least remove the existing kiloton figure as it is not cited anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.94.95 (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ATF is offering a $50,00 reward

[edit]

See the last paragraph of https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/new-details-emerge-about-the-federal-fallout-of-the-2013-explosion-in-city-of-west-texas/ . The article has more on policy changes, or lack there of, as well. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:West_Fertilizer_Company_explosion&oldid=1210946828"