Jump to content

Talk:2015–16 Big Bash League season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Player rankings

[edit]

Karyasuman - maybe you could explain why these are needed? They've been removed twice by two different editors. Please reach a consensus before they are re-added. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they (Player Rankings) perfectly accomplish the task of showing the best performers in the league which is definitely not shown in the stats, particularly more so with the all-rounders. Moreover, they are official BBL ratings provided by Cricket Australia and this page should provide as much information which is viable related to the league. Surely, people shouldn't have a problem with this? These type of information should easily be accessible through Wikipedia. Karyasuman (talk) 10:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
1. Maybe then you should remove match summaries as well, they are reported everywhere else, and maybe even top wicket takers and run makers. Too many stats! Karyasuman (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
2. Even ICC ranking should be a lot vague for you, why not remove them. And yes, let these articles remain a stub because of a conservative approach. Haha, official rankings are vague, original research maybe? As to how they are calculated, official rankings have a link to that. Readers are baffled? Another original research. Cool. Karyasuman (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
3. Excessive listing of stats? Hardly more than 3 stats on the page. I've seen much more than them on tournament pages, what else would you expect? Going by what they mention, if opinion polls are good enough, I hardly find BBL rankings to be less important for this page. And in my view, I did "consider using tables to enhance the readability of data lists". That section was hardly 5 cms long but created such a fuss. I am really disappointed with such an attitude. Karyasuman (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exclude per Anselm amd Lugnuts. I don't see how it adds value and I'm sorry but, personally, I don't support the use of statistics unless they are necessary or at least adding definite value for the benefit of the readers. Jack | talk page 09:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015–16 Big Bash League season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2015–16_Big_Bash_League_season&oldid=1199056733"