Talk:Acid test

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as High-importance).

On 15 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Acid test (gold) to Acid test. The result of the discussion was moved.

Part of gold?

shouldn't this article be part of the gold article? - Machtec (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is potential for a separate article here, methinks. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 03:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expert checking needed

This article was apparently created by somone who was more interested in the metaphorical usage of the term than the metallurgy/jewelry usage. It should be checked by someone with knowledge in the latter aspects. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 12:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jeepday (talk) 13:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Must it be destructive?

There was a claim in the article that an "acid test" in the metaphorical sense must be "destructive" to the subject. However in the examples given the test is not destructive: the soap brands were not destroyed, and Internet browsers that fail the Acid-N tests are not destroyed either. In fact the acid test is hardly destructive in the literal sense either, as it is usually done with a minute amount of acid on a minute amount of the material (such as a streak on a touchstone) or in a non-essential part of the object (such as the reverse of a medal). All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Restored the original sentence which claimed only that there was an 'original sense'. When I researched the current use of the phrase on the internet, it did not seem to me that most modern American use included the idea that the Acid test was destructive to imitations. The soap brand would clearly have been destroyed over thirty years if the soap didn't work: that is a clear sense of the claim. The Acid-N tests are not destructive.

I deleted that sentence again, before I read the above. I don't mind if you revert, but it is not clear to me that the metaphor ever referred to the "destructive" aspect of the test. I would rather think that it referred to the fact that the real acid test was "cheat-proof": absolutely no metal would pass it except real gold. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was decisive

Changed IS decisive back to WAS decisive. The ACID test IS NOT currently easy: it requires concentrated nitric acid, which is a restricted substance. Nor is it decisive: other tests are now used when the test must be decisive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 03:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"black stone"

Blackrock (geology)? --Jerome Potts (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acid test (gold). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080613014500/http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/print/1690/the-acid-test to http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/print/1690/the-acid-test

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acid test (gold) → Acid test
Acid test → Acid test (disambiguation)

– The Acid test (gold) article is now about much more than just gold - it covers metallurgy, geology, and figurative uses. That article should be at the base name, and the disambiguation page moved to a (disambiguation) title, and cleaned up. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.