|WikiProject United States / Government||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
|Text and/or other creative content from this version of AirLand Battle was copied or moved into AirSea Battle with this edit on 2013-07-16. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:AirLand Battle.|
The Schwartz will be with us always
amitai etzioni? anyone willing to give an opinion on whether this guy is sufficiently recognized an expert on military affairs so as to include his evaluation of ASB in this and other articles? my sense is that this is somewhat outside his competencies. however, he is evaluating it from more of a social/peacenik perspective, not conducting a detailed military analysis, so maybe it is fine. what do others think?Happy monsoon day 18:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
"Background" and "history" sections are kinda the same thing, no?
These two sections are kind of amorphous and overlapping. I don't know what the obvious answer is right now, but something to keep in mind when the article fills out. --Jprg1966 (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The "Doctorine" section
Uhm, wouldn't a section that actually describes what the doctorine is be useful, rather just discussing its history, who is coordinating it, and a bit of criticism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)