Talk:Al-Nas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Islam / Religious texts (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (marked as High-importance).
 

Broken Links[edit]

There are too many broken links. I could fix it if I wanted too. --Chaobreaker 18:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Seems fixed now. SOmeone fixed it I guess --Waqas1987 14:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Arabic Text Layout[edit]

The arabic text seems to be colourful. Im thinking this goes against consistency (with arabic text from other Surah pages) and also lacks professionalism, as it should be similar to rest of article. I would hope for it to be changed. I would probably change it, if no-one can submit a valid reason why not to change it. Waqas1987 14:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Virtues of Sura Al-Nas, Falaq, and Al-Mu'awwidhatayn[edit]

I will be editing virtues of Suras Falaq and Naas or the al-Mu'awwidhatayn soon. Please see discussion at Sura Al-Fatiha ([| click here] )
Verycuriousboy (talk) 05:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Merging[edit]

Should these be merged ? :
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Al-Falaq
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Al-Nas
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Al-Mu%27awwidhatayn
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Al-Ikhlas
Verycuriousboy (talk) 05:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

No, they are completely different topics. --IncidentFlux [ TalkBack | Contributions ] 07:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Copy violation[edit]

According to this tool, there is copy violation! So I insert the tag to underline this issue of article. Lstfllw203 (talk) 17:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)