This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
American Indian Religious Freedom Act was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Does anyone know a place where I kind find the complete act written down in one section? I've found bits and pieces, here and there, and pieced them togather, but not the whole thing. I'll continue looking, but any help would be apriciated. Thanks! Thε HaloΘ11:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 24, 2006, compares against the six good article criteria:
1. Well written?: The writing is grammatically correct, although a few of the sentences are awkward. The prose is not smooth--it doesn't flow naturally from sentence to sentence.
2. Factually accurate?: Everything is accurate, as far as I can tell. Sources are provided for most claims. Editors should try to find sources for a few unsourced claims. For example, the sentences near the end of 'Effects' that deal with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
3. Broad in coverage?: Article is not that long, and since this article is on a 20th century topic, I am sure more can be added. Who was involved in its passage? There was a quote from him, was this a bill he pushed? Give specific examples of American Indian religious practices before the Act was passed.
4. Neutral point of view?: It seems mostly NPOV. One exception is this In 1993, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act seemed to contradict this judgement, stating that the Government should not “substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion.” [12] The case was also part of the reason for the 1994 amendments. The source provided for this does not appear to be a legal authority. Instead, it looks like an advocacy site. Also, why are certain practices forbidden? The article paints the topic as the persecution of Native Americans and the Native Americans' fight for respect. Regardless of if this is true, there is mostly likely a rationale for not letting American Indians use eagle feathers. This also goes to thoroughness: please explain how the pre-AIRFA law came to be, and why.
5. Article stability? Article was changed significantly just one day before my review.
6. Images?: Current image is good. Images are not required for GA status, but they are a big help.
Aside from the points listed in the "good article" criteria, This article does an excellent job describing the background and reasons for the Act as well as provides an analysis of the original text of the resolution. What caught my interest was the expansive section on “Effects” which summarized the Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988) Supreme Court case and it’s direct relation to the AIRFA and the Employment Division V. Smith (1990) case. The article could be improved by including a few more cases that had relation to the Act, perhaps in a shorter list of links. Additionally, a link to a more comprehensive article of the Lyng v. Northwest Case would be very beneficial and something that I plan to work on in the near future.
Lineskier09 (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
