Jump to content

Talk:Amol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Poor quality

[edit]

A lot of poorly substantiated statements. It is not Ammian, for example, who says anything about the name of Amol, but rather a conjecture by a modern scholar: who is correctly identified in the article Amardi. In footnote 7 a website of "Amol Government" is linked to, which seems to be quite belly-up. Bill (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Handmaidens

[edit]

What does this mean: 'The Alawites ruled the city until Ziyarid and Buyid, who were the handmaidens of the Shiites'. 'Handmaidens' doesn't sound very neutral. Also, the Ziyarids were enemies of the Buyids. So how is this to be formulated clearly and neutrally? Glatisant (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amol city image.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Amol city image.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 11 September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shahandasht Waterfall.IRAN.Amol city.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Shahandasht Waterfall.IRAN.Amol city.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Shahandasht Waterfall.IRAN.Amol city.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malek Bahman Castle.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Malek Bahman Castle.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Malek Bahman Castle.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hezar sangar Amol.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Hezar sangar Amol.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hezar sangar Amol.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removals per WP:COPYVIO and more

[edit]

I have cut down this article per Wikipedia:Copyright violations because a major contributor (User:پارسا آملی and sockpuppets) have a history of repeated copyright infringement. The content should not be restored unless it can be verified that it is not a copyvio. While pursuing the page history, I noticed that some of the content removed predated User:پارسا آملی. Regardless, it should not be restored because Wikipedia is not a travel guide.

Some of the pictures were uploaded by said sockpuppets and are also likely copyvios. MER-C 13:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaoon.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Kaoon.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kaoon.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic additions by a sock known for false and copyvio material

[edit]

Please note that this article recently recieved major contribution by User:Amardha. Most of the contributions were added in this diff. The editor is believed to be a sockpuppet of User:پارسا آملی. (See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی.)

The sockmaster has a known history of adding copyvio and false content in relation to Amol. (Besides the sockmaster's history on English Wikipedia - including the contributions of their other socks, see Mehran's comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tower Tomb Sayyed Se Ton about the editors actions at the Persian Wikipedia.)

Also, as per WP:Copyright violations: "If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately.".

Normally, I would just undo this editor's edits. But due to subsequent editing, it can only be undone manually, which I simply do not have the time for today. If someone is willing to remove the editor's contributions, that would be great. Thanks. Singularity42 (talk) 15:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have made an effort to remove User:Amardha's edits. I began with the last version before Amardha's first edit; coincidentally a revision performed by me on May 17th. So I started with that revision and added in the additions made by User:Simax in the Population section. Then I moved to the Notable people section. This was a little trickier because both Simax and User:220ofBorg heavily edited this section. So I just took last version edited by Borg and copy pasted that version of the section in. Added in the linkrot template by 220Borg and that's it (my own changes were taken care of by reverting to last clean version) If I did it correctly, all of Amardha's edits have been removed while preseving the edits made between Simax and 220ofBorg. Only thing now it has some layout issues that I attempted to fix but its still not quite right. Probably just move an image or two to the gallery. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 22:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 12 September 2012

[edit]

https://advisor.fmr.com:11443/app/item/RD_13569_13677.html?pos=SR Testuser098 (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Amol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amol&oldid=1216892097"