|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apotheosis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- 1 Untitled
- 2 The article is completely incorrect.
- 3 The above comment is completely incorrect.
- 4 Consider this Cite?
- 5 Changing the greek root
- 6 Oblivion Reference?
- 7 Pronounciation?
- 8 Clinical psychology
- 9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotheosis#In_the_Roman_Catholic_church
- 10 Mistborn
- 11 Pop culture
- 12 Word choice
- 13 External links modified
- 14 Section on LDS beliefs, remains tagged for three years, needs further improvement
- 15 Mormon view biased
hmm i dont understand what apotheosis ahs to do with alexander pope's rape of the lock..
email me if u do!
--There is an apotheoisis in Alexander Pope's "The Rape of the Lock", occuring from lines 110 to 132, when Belinda's lock of hair soars upward to the heavens and is lost to immortal fame. Pope uses several epic conventions in the satirical poem, including the Invocation to the Muse, a dream vision, arming the hero for battle, and a descent into the underworld, to mock the portrayal of such a small offense, the snipping of a lock of hair, into a large feud.
There is an aspect of apotheosis related to mythology and literature. Joseph Campbell used this term to decrsibe the "Hero's" journey. Rain Mateo 04:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
I've been involved recently in a project to clean a bronze statue of Nelson in the centre of Liverpool UK in time for the bicentenary of his death. The statue had four chained prisoners sitting on a plinth, each of which was taken to Liverpool Conservation Centre to be cleaned with a laser. The top group of the statue including Nelson was cleaned insitu behind a structure of steel cladding to keep the laser in; this group was called the Apotheosis, hence my looking it up here, and it all makes sense now. http://www.redstarline.org.uk/liverpool_city.html Is this terminology peculiar to this statue or is it a part of 'monument vocabulary' ( Bart Edmondson firstname.lastname@example.org )
- Good question. I do not know the answer, but I can tell you that Nelson's is not the only "apotheosis" statue. There is an equestrian bronze in front of the Saint Louis Art Museum in St. Louis, Missouri called Apotheosis of St. Louis. — Kbh3rdtalk 04:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Apotheosis is also a Techno act, both famous and notorious for a techno version of Carl Orffs "O Fortuna", which was later pulled because the copyright hadn't expired yet. Several wiki pages link here, like Carmina Burana (Orff) and Eurodance Marcov 17:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
The article is completely incorrect.
Romans did not recognize any person as god. There is no source claiming any Roman emperor to be god. The inscriptions only say them to be divine.--Nixer 00:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you know what divine means?
Divintiy in Roman history and myth is a complicated matter, but I woudn't say that the article is 'completely incorrect'. Great generals, politicians and priests were made into 'divine' men, but that classification is well short of what we would call a god with creative and destructive power. For the article to be worthwhile, it only needs to avoid giving divine attributes to the divine men mentioned, unless the original sources are clear enough to use them. I think that the divine men were more like prophets than gods. Lothair of Lorraine (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
The above comment is completely incorrect.
Good God! To be divine is to be a god! There is not even anything unique about the emperors being seen as gods -- the head of a household became a family ancestral god on his death.
Consider this Cite?
What about this as a citation?
Changing the greek root
I'm going to use the lexical ἀποθεόω instead of ἀποθεοῦν as is now listed. It doesn't make sense to list a random infinitive version of the word.
I think the reference to a weapon from the game Oblivion is a little meaningless, here... Plus, I changed "Staff" to "Staves." I think that bullet should go away, personally. 220.127.116.11 16:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Just out of interest, how is Apotheosis supposed to be pronounced? is it "appo-THEE-oh-sis, appathy-ah-sis" or anything else? i know this is pretty lame, but i'm really interested in words, but i tend to have pretty poor pronounciation. cheers. Dark_Wounds —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark wounds (talk • contribs) 08:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dictionary.com has /əˌpɒθiˈoʊsɪs/ and /ˌæpəˈθiəsɪs/. — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 03:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
The clinical psychology section says nothing about clinical psychology. It's just a bunch of speculation about psychedelics and their "possible" effects. It should be deleted. ---18.104.22.168 (talk) 15:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Does it seem to anyone else that Sanderson's Mistborn trilogy gets a disproportionate amount of pagespace dedicated to it? I think it should be trimmed down to the same paragraphs-worth the other examples get, with a link to the series' page for those wanting further explication.
Should we add Madoka Kaname from Puella Magi Madoka Magica as an example? She reached godhood at the end of the series, becoming hope itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 07:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
The Warmachine section is probably not using the best example. Apotheosis is a historical fact in the game's literature (where it is called "ascension"), and the first known cases were the "god" and "devil" of Cygnar's religion. This can be found in the Iron Kingdoms RPG books (Warmachine is set in the Iron Kingdoms setting) "Iron Kingdoms Vol I: Character Guide", pp. 209-226, 2004 "Iron Kingdoms Vol II: World Guide", pp. 19-20, 2005, "Iron Kingdoms Full Metal Fantasy Roleplaying Game: Kings, Nations, and Gods", pages not available at the moment, 2013.Mogdonazia (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
The article states that "divinization" is the proper English word to use. This is nonsense; the word apotheosis has been in use (meaning "divinization") for centuries; check the OED; and if it were not in use, then the article would be called "divinization." This strikes me as an absurd attempt to replace a proper English word with a neologism designed to make things "easier" for people of limited lexical experience. Theonemacduff (talk) 04:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- English dictionaries recognize both words. They don't mean the same, as the article explains. Esoglou (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apotheosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216201419/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1J.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1J.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
Section on LDS beliefs, remains tagged for three years, needs further improvement
For anyone who may be looking to continue to improve the section on LDS doctrine in this article, I recommend this Wiki article section on Divinization/Deification that seems to me to cover the same subject in reference to Latter-Day Saint belief but without the infractions seen in this article's section here. Chief2443 (talk) 02:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Mormon view biased
The statement that "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church or Mormons) do believe in apotheosis along the lines of the Christian tradition of divinization or deification, but in the church it is referred to as exaltation or eternal life, and is accomplished through "sanctification." is written by one not familiar with the full doctrine of the LDS or written by a member of the LDS.
The LDS doctrine has no similarity to ancient Christianity. The LDS doctrine is that man may evolve to God just like God. In other words an essential change of being from man to God. This view, needless to say, was and is condemned as outside of the Chritsiantan Faith. Deofocation in the ancient Church saw only those attributes that are communicable(i.e. the virtues of love, justice, compassion intelligence, rationality, morality, creativity, moral goodness)as what would be "divinized". Divinized in that it would be glorified in our future state of the resurrection as man. There was no hint that this meant that we would also share in God's non communicable attributes of omni attributes like his omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotency, eternality, etc)
This comment should be worded to reflect that and not make it appear that the LDS doctrine is the same in its features to ancient Christianity.