Talk:Armement Air-Sol Modulaire

Armement Air-Sol Modulaire has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Armement Air-Sol Modulaire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Spell out and link all acronyms the first time you use them and put the abbreviation next to the term. Convert all metric measurements to English units in the infobox and the main body.

B. MoS compliance:
Non-governmental references need publisher information. Press releases are OK.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Hello and thanks for the review. I've already provided conversions for all metric measurements and spelled out abbreviations however, i'm not so sure about what you mean by providing publisher information for non-governmental references. According to WP:CITEHOW

Citations for World Wide Web articles typically include:

name of the author(s)
title of the article within quotation marks
name of the website (linked to a Wikipedia article about the site if it exists, or to Website's "about" page)
date of publication
page number(s) (if applicable)
the date you retrieved it (required if the publication date is unknow

All of this info is already provided so what else is needed? --Victor12 (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- There are no links to the home pages of Interavia, Ixarm, Defense Industry Daily or Ares. That's what I meant by publisher.
  - OK, I've just inserted the links. --Victor12 (talk) 21:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 military intervention in Libya

I signal of use for 2011 military intervention in Libya. L'amateur d'aéroplanes, french wiki

Bomb or missile?

I heard about this bomb after the first mali air strikes. On some websites and even in this artikle they are called a 'missle'. From my point of view, a missle as a engine, while a bomb uses the potential height + maybe wings for gliding.

I echo to a certain extant the previous comment. At the bottom of the article in the section on Libya, it calls it a "missile" and a "bomb" several times within a few lines. I think the person who posted above me missed that it DOES include a rocket motor, so it's not solely a bomb, but it is not a missile either. I'd call it a "boosted glide bomb", which also happens to be a precision-guided-munition. Perhaps a clear statement of this would be in order to dispel any confusion? It seems simple enough when one reads the description, but apparently not simple enough for some people. .45Colt 13:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on AASM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AASM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 August 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is a consensus for this requested move. (closed by non-admin page mover) qedk (t 桜 c) 05:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AASM → Armement Air-Sol Modulaire
AASM (disambiguation) → AASM

– Per third party search results, I'm not seeing concrete results that the acronym "AASM" primarily refers to the subject currently sitting at the ambiguous title AASM. Most rally's I see are a mix of Australian Active Service Medal and American Academy of Sleep Medicine when looking up the term "AASM". For that reason, the disambiguation page should be moved to the base title (and the subject currently at the base title can be moved to the proposed title per WP:NATURALDIS.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pageview stats Colin M (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what to make of this situation. The pageview stats are such that the weapon would seem to qualify as primary in terms of usage (barely), getting about 3x the monthly views of Australian Active Service Medal and American Academy of Sleep Medicine. That, combined with AASM apparently being the ideal title for this article (and only a redirect candidate for the other two), make me want to say there's nothing broken here. But then, you're right, the search results for 'AASM', surprisingly, don't give anything about the weapon until you dig past the first couple pages. That goes for a web search, a Google Scholar search, and a Google Books search. If a move away from AASM is to be done, another name to consider would be AASM Hammer. It gets about 2x the results on Google News compared to "Armement Air-Sol Modulaire". Colin M (talk) 01:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Searching for AASM should bring people to the dab page due to lack of primary topic, not to this weapon. They are all initialisations of proper names. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support move of dab page to base name - no indication that this weapon is the primary topic. What the weapon should be moved to, I'm not sure - AASM (weapon) might be appropriate, or its full name as suggested by the proposer. PamD 09:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Doesn't look like the weapon is more important than the other meanings. --McSly (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Usage by Ukraine against Russia

Hello, I am from Belgorod (Russia), and this is my first time ever writing anything on Wikipedia, hence I have a question... That will likely be removed, or just rejected since it's the Wikipedia, known for it's huge bias regarding this topic. Will there ever be any mentions on this page of (so far thankfully unsuccessful) usage of these Hammers against my city? I am used to the complete ignorance of local suffering and deaths in western mainstream media, but after this all is over, is there any chance for the actual truth to be written later on Wikipedia? Thanks. 217.107.194.43 (talk) 06:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the usage of that weapon in the Russian invasion of Ukraine conflict is already mentioned in the article. If you think that specific events should be included, you can propose them here. Don't forget to provide a source as it is needed to make any change to the article. --McSly (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]