Jump to content

Talk:Artificial kidney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's some ideas for this article to make it more reliable.

  1. more sources. DailyMail.com is not a reliable source. I would suggest looking through a more reliable database to find more relevant and peer reviewed articles. Your other article is from 2008. That is not reliable anymore. Any scientific article will soon be out of date unless it is something concrete like the theory of gravity.
  2. Add more links that relate to other articles. You want people to be able to find out what they do not know through other wikipedia articles.
  3. Be careful adding highly scientific words without adding definitions or links to the article that explains it. For example, people reading this article may not know what hypertension, pertoneal, and cardiovascular disease are or what they are related to and why.

CharlotteHayden (talk) 16:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We plan to add more information about the advances, usages, and improvements needed for the wearable artificial kidney. There are more details and specifications needed for the use of the WAK (wearable artificial kidney) that can be added to this article. We will also add more on the prevalence of end-stage renal diseases and why the artificial kidney is important. There is no information on side effects or disadvantages so we will add that. What I plan to add to the artificial kidney article on wikipedia is talking more about how the wearable artificial kidney works. Another change I plan to make is adding information on at least one experiment that involves the wearable artificial kidney. The reason why I want to add this information is because it can give people an idea if the wearable artificial kidney is beneficial for someone with kidney disease. Lastly, the artificial wikipedia article says that it needs to be updated, so I plan on using a lot of information from the MSU library database to make the information more current. (Kuiperal (talk) 12:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)) Reference:[reply]

Gura, V., Macy, A., Beizai, M., Enzon, C., Golper, T. Technical Breakthroughs in the Wearable 

Artificial Kidney (WAK). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736696/?tool=pmcentrez

Gura, V., Rivara, M. B., Bieber, S., Munshi, R., Smith, N. C., Linke, L., . . . Himmelfarb, J. (2016). A wearable artificial kidney for patients with end-stage renal disease. JCI Insight, 1(8). doi:10.1172/jci.insight.86397 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936831/

Michalec, M., Tymecki, Ł, & Koncki, R. (2016). Biomedical analytical monitor of artificial kidney operation: Monitoring of creatinine removal. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 128, 28-34. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2016.04.021

Ronco, C., Davenport, A., Gura, V. (2008, July 8). Toward the wearable artificial kidney. Hemodialysis International, 12. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00295.x Kuiperal (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear several groups have created a wikipresence by making encyclopedia pages that refer to their own work, possibly to the exclusion of others. the Gura Group, the Fissell group -ie me-, another group at UCLA....

I would concur that the pages (automated) wearable artificial kidney and artificial kidney should be merged. The work of leonard's group, Humes' group, Saito's group, Nissensons (now defunct) project others should probably all sit together until one breaks free from the peleton. Whf4 (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

The "Artificial Kidney" section of this article is plagiarized directly from http://www.hindustantimes.com/First-implantable-artificial-kidney-created-by-Shuvo-Roy/Article1-634201.aspx. I had a tough time finding the correct template to use to tag this, so I went with Template:Close_paraphrasing. Additionally, I have added Template:Cleanup to the article as a whole. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

Isn't Wearable artificial kidney just a subset of Artificial kidney? I propose to merge the two articles. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, add Wearable artificial kidney as a section to Artificial kidney. Aditya (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have completed this merge. As this article appears to be copied in whole from http://allaboutroboticsurgery.com/artificialkidneydevices.html, I have only preserved the lede. LT90001 (talk) 06:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

We have a backlog in copyright cleanup and this is out of my usual area, so I'm hoping that somebody else can update the article to include information (that isn't a copyvio!) on the articial kidney prototype. [1], [2]. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent data about bioengineered kidney

[edit]

New data about bioengineered kidneys:

Nature Medicine: Bioengineered kidney makes urine after transplantation

Nature Medicine: Regeneration and experimental orthotopic transplantation of a bioengineered kidney

The Independent:Scientists close in on pioneering transplant of synthetic kidney

Shcha (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Artificial kidney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]