Talk:Asian Dust

Weather Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia

Moving this section?

I suggesting removing this entry and linking Asian dust to mineral dust; the mineral dust article already incorporates the important points of the Asian dust article. Waiting for feedback. Marenco 08:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that's a good idea. Although mineral dust is an impressive article with lots of room to grow, it would seem best for that article to cover the general phenomenon of mineral dust and its effects on health and the environment... Methinks that article should deal with particular dust phenomena only in summary style, leaving the details for other articles. There is more than enough encyclopedic information out there about Asian dust, and no doubt about Sahara dust as well, to easily fill a full-length article (or several). -- Visviva 09:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then leaving Asian dust where it is. I will shorten in Mineral dust the details repeated from Asian dust. Marenco 15:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a natural disaster caused by human's development and desire to further improve lifestyle. I am not saying it's wrong to desire comfort and convenience; but I just hope, people should leave space and respect to our nature and stop picking on those things which could damage us.

"In the last decade or so, it has become a serious problem due to industrial pollutants (previously not a threat)" What does this mean? I think industrial pollutants have always been a problem. Are we saying the dust contains industrial pollutants or that the pollutants are increasing desertification? --Gbleem 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed words around so it should now look better. --Revth (talk) 04:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--a study by bob marley? must be vandalism??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.106.105.238 (talk) 15:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration

We could probably move a shitload of images from the JP Wiki that are already onto Commons to this article; more images would dramatically improve the quality of the article. Images can explain things much easier than text.

(on JP Wiki, released under CC and GFDL)

(on JP Wiki, released under CC and GFDL)
(on JP Wiki, released under CC and GFDL)

(on JP Wiki, released under CC and GFDL)

Regards, -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 13:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

According to the text ("Dust deposition in Beijing during the 2006 season.") the picture should be from 2006. But how is it possible that one can see badges from 2007 and 2008 in the window? 79.255.69.108 (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They're permits which expire in 2007 and 2008. --benlisquare_T•C•E 05:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Asian Dust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040319153009/http://www.sciencenews.org:80/articles/20011006/bob13.asp to http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20011006/bob13.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asian Dust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asian Dust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140708181744/http://www.lbk.ars.usda.gov/wewc/biblio/bar.htm to http://www.lbk.ars.usda.gov/wewc/biblio/bar.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cause section needs update

I'm far from an expert on this topic, but it seems to me that the Cause section overemphasizes anthrhopogenic factors and, more notably, fails to account for demographic developments in China (where a majority of Asian Dust comes from, as per the image on ja:黄砂) over the past several decades. Given the country's modernization and declining fertility rate, the narrative presented here no longer holds true for it; it may still hold true for Kazakhstan and Mongolia, but it's hard to know for certain without any citations. This being the case, it would be sweet if anyone more knowledgeable about this topic than myself could take the time to rewrite this section. -- ErrorDestroyer (talk) 10:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]