Talk:Attempto Controlled English

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Attempto Controlled English article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Backwards example?

ACE construction rules require that each noun be introduced by a determiner (a, every, no, some, at least 5, ...). ACE interpretation rules decide that (1) is interpreted as universally quantified, while (2) is interpreted as existentially quantified. Sentences like "Women are human" do not follow ACE syntax and are consequently not valid.

Isn't (1) existential, while (2) universal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4898:80E8:1:2D62:D1AA:A0F3:B54 (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Misunderstood these as referring to words in parenthesis. I'll add clarification.

Uncomfortable with examples

When copy-editing this article, I was not satisfied with the way examples are used. They are key to the article, but do not flow well. I have brought consistency to the flow by added colon's at the end of lead-in phrases. It would be ungainly and highly repetitious to be saying "for example" every time. But maybe a more thorough rewrite could make the reading smoother. Any ideas? Matthew C. Clarke 13:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced section?

Regarding the "unreferenced section" template in the section "ACE in a nutshell" - isn't it possible just to add a reference to Fuchs, Kaljurand, and Kuhn 2010 (currently #2 in the "References" section) and remove that template? StormWillLaugh (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete rule?

Our text reads, "ACE construction rules require that each noun be introduced by a determiner." But we go on to give allegedly acceptable ACE sentences that sound natural in regular English but that seem to contradict the quoted rule, to wit sentences with proper nouns. Kdammers (talk) 01:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]