Talk:Avocet Mining

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Burkina Faso / Guinea

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Burkina Faso.
	Guinea portal This article is supported by WikiProject Guinea.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... amending relevant copy to ensure it abides by copyright guidelines --JaneSmith23 (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please advise on how I can ensure I don't impinge copyright or wiki guidelines on content? I am an independent contributor and have sourced all content from reputable sources and publications, which were all appropriately referenced. Any help you can offer would be appreciated. Jane # JaneSmith23 (talk) 16:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few points to note: (a) any material added should be additional to material that is already there (it has already been properly sourced) (b) any new material should also be properly sourced (i.e. from independent sources as required by WP:SOURCE) (c) any material which presents the company in a solely positive light will be removed per WP:ADVERT and could lead to the artiucle being deleted as nearly happened here (d) any material addded should be in proper prose as required by WP:PROSE (lists of dates and acquisitions is not proper prose). I hope this helps. Dormskirk (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you that helps. I will amend this. Could you please elaborate on point(b)? Does this include media pieces? JaneSmith23 (talk) 17:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have amended the History section sourcing facts and figures from appropriate factual references where possible. I have used many different sources - newspapers, presentations, Annual Reports, LSE etc. as I feel it is important to quote the facts as well as general information. Is this acceptable in line with wiki policies? JaneSmith23 (talk) 11:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you have done a great job of it now. Well done. Dormskirk (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Much appreciated JaneSmith23 (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Avocet Mining. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]