Talk:Baron Berkeley

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The correct URL for Reference #1 is: http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v015/bg015089.pdf Ninanta (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Mossley1 (talk) 15:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 15:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to be made regarding the dormant title coming out of dormancy and a new earl. Mossley1 (talk) 09:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mossley1: No Harry, your hoax has no traction here. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask the evidence against this title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mossley1 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mossley1: the issue is lack of any evidence for it; it is up to you, or anyone seeking to add this, to provide a reliable, published source as required by the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy. Re-establishment of an earldom would have been notified in the London Gazette. By the way, if the idea should occur to you of making up a fake London Gazette page, don't bother - that has been tried before by an "Earl Roberts". JohnCD (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or the person in question provided a letter patent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mossley1 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A piece of paper is not enough. Wikipedia requires a published source so that it can be checked. A claimed earldom which is not mentioned in the London Gazette is a WP:REDFLAG situation which would require exceptionally good sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baron Berkeley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426082040/http://www.bgas.org.uk/tbgas/bgc011.php to http://www.bgas.org.uk/tbgas/bgc011.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Smith of Nibley

“The epithets of each baron were coined by John Smith of Nibley (d.1641), steward of the Berkeley estates”

How was this done for baronies created long after his death? And why were these particular names chosen? Clarity needed. 31.94.64.80 (talk) 10:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Over reliance on 17th century source

Complete Peerage (which we are also citing) and other modern sources disagree with Smith about the feudal title being equivalent to a peerage. I think we need to remove that claim. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 13:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]