Jump to content

Talk:Bart to the Future

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBart to the Future has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed

"Charity readings"?

[edit]

I thought it was "Fiscal solvency"... AnonMoos 00:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In 2030

[edit]

I have integrated most of the lines onto the synopsis. Please try figure out a way to integrate the rest of them, and maybe write down an ending at the synopsis. Cheers.--Kylohk 14:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sig Runes on Ned's glasses

[edit]

During this episode, Ned Flanders is wearing sunglasses and both glasses have the SS insignia on them. Both glasses have 2 S-symbols on them, like the Schutzstaffel symbol. Not just that, they are two white oblique Sig Runes on black, exactly like the symbol of the Nazi SS. (video source; 6:40) --82.171.70.54 (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bart to the Future/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. On hold for now. TBrandley 15:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page view statistics

[edit]

For reasons that should be obvious to even the most dimwitted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology, there has been considerable interest in this article lately, as one can see from comparisons in page views with other season 11 episodes, including the previous and next episodes and the season premiere and season finale. From Nov 9 to 12, views of Bart to the Future even eclipsed The Simpsons, sometimes by a substantial degree. Kudos to the editors who got it up to GA before the spike and the others who've updated it. It remains to be seen whether the views will subside. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]