Talk:Battle of Brunanburh (poem)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Battle of Brunanburh (poem) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 25, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

Redlink, could be potential for possible article[edit]

  1. Alexandra Hennessey Olsen

-- Cirt (talk) 15:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Brunanburh (poem)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC) I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of May 21, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing quality is pretty good. I would certainly recommend going for Peer Review after the GA Review is over one way or the other, and soliciting input from previously uninvolved users for copyediting, and perhaps at WP:GOCE, and/or posting to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to WP:RS sources, no issues here.
3. Broad in coverage?:
  1. Lede/intro - needs to be expanded. Per WP:LEAD, lede should summarize entire article's contents, and function as a standalone piece.
  2. Small paragraphs, some small paragraphs in Style and tone and Editions and translations. Can these be merged or expanded upon?
4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral tone throughout, no issues here.
5. Article stability? No issues with stability.
6. Images?: No images used, no issues here.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. -- Cirt (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

GA passed[edit]

In response to your previous questions: yes. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing the issues raised during the GA Review. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Brunanburh (poem). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)