Talk:Battle of Brunanburh (poem)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Battle of Brunanburh (poem) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 25, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Norse history and culture (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Poetry (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
British Library project (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is related to the British Library. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Redlink, could be potential for possible article[edit]

  1. Alexandra Hennessey Olsen

-- Cirt (talk) 15:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Brunanburh (poem)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC) I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of May 21, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing quality is pretty good. I would certainly recommend going for Peer Review after the GA Review is over one way or the other, and soliciting input from previously uninvolved users for copyediting, and perhaps at WP:GOCE, and/or posting to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to WP:RS sources, no issues here.
3. Broad in coverage?:
  1. Lede/intro - needs to be expanded. Per WP:LEAD, lede should summarize entire article's contents, and function as a standalone piece.
  2. Small paragraphs, some small paragraphs in Style and tone and Editions and translations. Can these be merged or expanded upon?
4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral tone throughout, no issues here.
5. Article stability? No issues with stability.
6. Images?: No images used, no issues here.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. -- Cirt (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

GA passed[edit]

In response to your previous questions: yes. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for addressing the issues raised during the GA Review. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)