Talk:Battle of Taegu

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Taegu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Battle of Taegu has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 12, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
October 4, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 20, 2018, August 20, 2020, and August 20, 2022.

Current status: Good article

Military history: Asian / Korean / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Korea Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Inconsistent rank of Paik Sun Yup

Under the command of Major General Paik Sun Yup, this division fought an extremely bloody defense of the mountain approaches to Taegu.[40]

According to Paik's own memoir From Pusan to Panmunjom, he was a Colonel/Brigadier General around that time, and he did not receive the rank Major General until mid 1951. Furthermore, Major General rank is only reserved for corps commander in ROK Armed Forces, and Paik was a division commander at the time. Did US Army Center of Military History made a typo here? Jim101 (talk) 04:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently so. Appleman's US Army History book, Chapter 19 (avaliable here) even has a photo of Paik specifically listing his rank as major general on page 350. Do you have a page in his bio I can use as a ref to change it in this article? —Ed!^(talk) 04:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to his memoir on page 28, he was promoted to Brigadier General on July 27, 1950, and he was promoted to Major General in April 1951, per page 139-140. So I think that seal it. It is interesting that Appleman did not make the same mistake in his next Korean War book Disaster in Korea. Jim101 (talk) 04:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Taegu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Following the invasion of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) by its northern neighbor, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) and the subsequent outbreak of the Korean War on 25 June 1950, the United Nations decided to enter the conflict on behalf of South Korea. The United States, a member of the UN, subsequently committed ground forces to the Korean peninsula...
True but misleading. The United Nations voted to assist South Korea with United Nations Security Council Resolution 83 on the afternoon 27 June. The US had already announced its intention to commit forces earlier in the day.
Fixed with a different word. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you change the references to the "24th Infantry" to "24th Infantry Division" or "24th" as the former idiom is used for regiments?
Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Task Force Smith" is referred to without saying what it was.
Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Walker" is referred to without noting that he was Eighth Army commander. Explain and link.
Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"General Gay" is referred to without noting his post or correct rank or linking to his article.
Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As is General MacArthur, whose first mention is merely "MacArthur" in the discussion of Hill 303.
Fixed. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"This conprised the largest Air Force operation since the Battle of Normandy in World War II." There's a spelling error. And are you sure about this? Many bombing raids in 1944-45 involved more than 98 aircraft.
I thought so too, but that is a direct fact taken from a source which I haven't seen contradicted by another source. It probably refers to more than just the number of aircraft involved. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to all of your concerns. —Ed!^(talk) 20:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Profile

Create a page for a social worker Jibin ji (talk) 15:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]