Jump to content

Talk:Beto Vázquez Infinity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nightwish controversy

[edit]

One aspect I have left out in the re-write of the page to make it more encyclopaedic is the entanglement with the whole Nightwish issue in relation to the departure of their original singer. There is a mention of the first album in the official biography that is less then flattering about the self-titled debut. At no stage was it suggested that Vázquez had any involvement in the split (as far as I can tell) but it could be something for future consideration, if and when more facts around these events become known. Further details see Once Upon a Nightwish. Karst (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beto Vázquez Infinity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beto Vázquez Infinity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History merge

[edit]

I agree 17 years was a long time ago! However, cut/paste moves are actually a form of copyright violation, because Wikipedia's main license requires that all contributions be attributed if you copy it. In other words, without attribution, copying content from Wikipedia is no different from copying content straight from The New York Times or another proprietary publication. Normally, we provide this attribution using page history. However, when you do a cut/paste move, only the person who did a cut/paste move is shown in the page history, not anyone else who previously contributed to the article. Because 17 years is not enough for the copyright to expire, I have tagged this page so that an administrator can fix the copyright violation. Just because this copyright violation has existed for a while does not make it okay. Best, HouseBlastertalk 23:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just read about the WikiProject History Merge and it has a noble goal. Glad it is already fixed on this article. Thank you for insisting on this. Just for anecdotal reasons I want to point out that Wikipedia license 17 years ago was not Creative Commons but GNU FDL, which is a pretty free license. Once rights are released for something, they cannot be restricted in the future (you can restrict new versions, but no previous one). So one could copy a Wikipedia article as it looked like in 2006 without citing Wikipedia and it won't be a copyright violation. Wikipedia moved to CC in 2009. So technically one could copy a Wikipedia article giving credit only to those users to edited the article from 2009 on. Still, is nice to see users care about these details. Another anecdote, my page move in 2006 was actually wrong. I found out about it years later, I will see if I can fix this.--Neo139 (talk) 20:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Beto Vazquez Infinity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 9 § Beto Vazquez Infinity until a consensus is reached. Neo139 (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]