Talk:Beverley Minster

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Beverley Minster is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Beverley Minster is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Beverley Minster is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tim Brown?[edit]

There is no such "notable chorister" Tim Brown. That is self-promotion on his part, probably. There are far more deserving people who are not mentioned, like the choir master Alan Spedding.

Architecture Type[edit]

Following comment by User:130.88.48.18 moved from article page -

it is early english to decorated to perpendicular architecture not 'gothic to perpendicular' gothic is a bit of an umbrella term.

When the article grows we can add this[edit]

-- SECisek 07:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just a suggestion for more info. The organists are listed but not the vicars - surely of greater interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Hirschfeld (talk • contribs) 14:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Beverley Minster/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires expansion

Keith D 11:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beverley Minster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728102942/http://www.hexhamabbey.org.uk/visits-history/frith-stool/ to http://www.hexhamabbey.org.uk/visits-history/frith-stool/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural history could be revised and expanded.[edit]

I remember first reading this article, at a point when I knew very little about Beverley Minster. I wanted to find out about the architectural history of the building, but left very confused and had to find information and photos elsewhere. Had any substantial portions of an assumed Norman building survived? (No.) But for the picture of the superb 14th century Decorated nave, which is completely unmentioned, one would not know of its existence. I like the details such as the writ by William the Conqueror, and the Sherwood oaks granted by Henry III; and there seems to be strong coverage of the improvements and restoration of the 16th through 19th centuries. But the period in which the building was constructed remains nebulous, confusing, and flawed in this article.

This is one of the great Gothic churches of England, an absolutely outstanding building in its architecture and in its scale. It deserves more than this. I don't feel as if I know enough to undertake these revisions and expansions, but surely there's someone who can? 65.255.71.187 (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Armed with Pevsner, I have now greatly expanded the History section. Please feel free to review, suggest changes, edit. I would appreciate it. 65.255.73.147 (talk) 01:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but that's a messy way to do citations - do you mind if I change it? Johnbod (talk) 01:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. I'm new here and wasn't sure on the correct method for citations of that sort. I'll continue to watch this article for your changes so I'll know the right method from now on. Thanks.Brandt Nightingale (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To clear up a point of possible confusion: I am the user who made the previous comments here and expanded the article. I just didn't have a Wikipedia account or username at that point. I apologize for any confusion caused.Brandt Nightingale (talk) 04:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]