Jump to content

Talk:Blem (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Blem (song)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Blem (song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "UK":

  • From I'm on One: "Official UK Singles Top 100 - 20th August 2011". The Official Charts Company. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2011.
  • From Marvins Room: Zywietz, Tobias. "Chart Log UK – Weekly Updates Sales 2011". zobbel.de. Tobias Zywietz. Retrieved August 3, 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 12:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 August 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) JE98 (talk) 12:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Blem (song)Blem – "Blem" currently redirects to "Pledge (brand)". No mention of the word "Blem" in that article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:5A4:3BE4:3B4A:ADDF (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)--Relisting.usernamekiran(talk) 15:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. DrStrauss talk 18:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A S C Johnson brand with 60 years history and still in use in Argentina is not in terms of long term encyclopaedic notability comparable with a WP:RECENT album track that hasn't been officially released as a single and now has a merge tag on it? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I think at this point it is best if we create a dab page for the two brands. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:854B:AA85:6FBE:209 (talk) 20:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Not clear if there's a primary topic and it seems unlikely, in fact even Blem (song) is seriously ambiguous, there being two songs and it's arguable which is the more significant and/or likely as a search term long term. The base name Blem should be a three-way DAB for now. Andrewa (talk) 09:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Andrewa and In ictu oculi, Blem should remain a disambiguation page. If there are two or more songs with the title "Blem", Blem (song) should redirect to the dab page and an artist disambiguator should be added to the song article(s). — Zawl 15:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge - no article content[edit]

Surely it must be possible to have more content than "Blem" is a song by Canadian musician Drake from his playlist, More Life (2017).[1]" + sales figures?... In ictu oculi (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]