Talk:Body Harvest

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Bejeweled Stars (1 participant)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Could we possibly get an expansion, relating to more plot details, the game atmosphere, games music choice and the locations involved. Perhaps even more information on each location and some back story of it, or what happens in those locations.

The main Antagonists

I think that more information on the Hivemind and evil Adam should be written espicially on there powers as well as every other character worth noting. I can start writng it but you`ll have to create separate links for the hivemind and tomegathion and anyone else but you`ll have to edit whatever you think is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.173.103 (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The second trivia item has a statement tacked onto the end saying the game was delayed because it is similar to Star Fox 64. This seems highly unlikely, the games do not resemble eachother at all, they arn't even in the same genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.69.192 (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Body harvest.JPG

Image:Body harvest.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source

http://web.archive.org/web/19981202004638/http://www.next-generation.com:80/jsmid/news/4542.html

Metacritic Score

I really wish Metacritic was not held up as the be all and end all on Wiki. Apart from all the other issues with Metacritic (the site is not objective fact, it uses weighted scores, and what represents "mixed reviews" is also an opinion, not a fact), in this case The linked score here is based on a totally insufficient number of reviews (there are only 12), and is totally unrepresentative of the scores the game gained at the time. A full aggregate of contemporary reviews would likely be closer to 8/10. Due to this oversight the Body Harvest page here is giving a highly distorted picture to its readers about the game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23CC:B481:6801:14F0:5894:9DFC:9225 (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are ten other review scores in the table alongside Metacritic, so I think readers can gather the general consensus from there. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]