Talk:Bowdoin station

Bowdoin station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 4, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Greater Boston Public Transit High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Massachusetts / Boston Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as Mid-importance).

A fact from Bowdoin station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the entrance to Bowdoin station was designed by Josep Lluís Sert as part of a project for a never-built chapel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bowdoin station.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

The entrance to Bowdoin station

~~... that the entrance to Bowdoin station was designed by Josep Lluís Sert to match a never-built chapel?~~
- ALT1: ... that the entrance to Bowdoin station was designed by Josep Lluís Sert as part of a project for a never-built chapel? Source: 'Sunken' subway kiosk proposed: "Jose Luis Sert and his group have designed the chapel in the Bowdoin sq. section for the Catholic archdiocese. And they were persuaded to design the changes in the subway entrance."

Reviewed: Julián is a Mermaid

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

This article is new enough and long enough. The image does not appear in the article, which makes it ineligible for DYK, @Pi.1415926535:, you can add it if you wish. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Swapped the image into the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The image can now be used as it is present in the article and suitably licensed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came by to promote this, but footnote 4 does not adequately verify this sentence: The new brutalist headhouse, near the middle of the station, was designed by Josep Lluís Sert as part of a project for a never-built Catholic chapel nearby. There is nothing in the source about brutalist architecture or the chapel never being built. The hook fact, that the entrance was designed to match the chapel, is not mentioned or sourced in the article. Yoninah (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can always omit the "never-built" from the hook if you want, or replace it with "planned", but I don't see any other problems with the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. But the sentence in the article needs better verification. Yoninah (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah and Cwmhiraeth: I've added a citation for the chapel never being built, and removed "brutalist" as it's not entirely clear whether this is brutalism or closely-related modernism. I've also adjusted the hook to reflect that the headhouse was designed as part of the chapel project, not necessarily to match it. I believe this addresses the issues raised. I'm still waiting on some requested offline sources to clarify the architectural style and so on, but hopefully this is sufficient for now. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]