Talk:Brachyscome ascendens

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Brachyscome ascendens is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Rather than linking only the taxobar to the Wikidata item, it's much better to properly link the whole article to Wikidata, as I've done here. This means you don't need to put any parameters in the taxobar, and links the article immediately to any articles in other languages or often to a Wikimedia Commons category. Hope that makes sense!.

Blythwood (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Blythwood:. This is a little curious (for those who only edit Wikipedia), since you appear to have changed nothing in the article, but only changed the Wikidata item. Gderrin (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Gderrin:, sure, I know you got autopatrolled long before the current page review messaging came in. (Incidentally, have you thought of getting the new page reviewer right? You'd be more than well qualified for it.) I also marked the article as patrolled yesterday, but I thought this was worth suggesting. My feeling's if you're getting the info off Wikidata you might as well finish the backlinks, but I'd love to know if you disagree, because I know how many species articles you've created. Anyway, nowadays you can leave a message separately to that review action that doesn't explicitly say that's what you've done. Blythwood (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again@Blythwood:. Aha! - now I get it. Thanks. And for the compliment but I'm fairly occupied writing plant articles. One day ... page reviewer...etc. Gderrin (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]