Talk:Brahmaloka

---

Sources of the article

It is difficult to write about Satyaloka and about the relation to Brahmapura because in Hinduism the teachings are transferred orally and in a tantric twilight language. Administrator : Please say what is unreliable and what could be erased and why Manbu (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Brahmapura or Satyaloka or Satya bagecha

• The Siva Purana tells abou higher worlds : ...beginning with Atala and ending with Satyaloka. (01 : Satya-loka 02 : Tapa-loka 03 : Jana-loka 04 ....
• The Nada Bindu Upanishad says within the description of the bird Hamsa : His body extends upwards through the seven Lokas : Bhurloka, Bhuvahloka, Svarloka, Maharloka, Janaloka, Tapoloka, Satyaloka.

There is no talk about any garden. So the Satya bagecha is not necessary the Satyaloka of the upanishads ! - and i think that the redirection is a mistake.(Manbu)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brahmapura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120629055709/http://www.experiencefestival.com/siddhapura to http://www.experiencefestival.com/siddhapura

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Tags

This article does not make it clear that it is referring to a mythological concept; readers may be forgiven for thinking that Wikipedia is presenting some aspects of Hindu mythology as fact. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

I believe that portions of this article have been copied from unreliable sources (without attribution) that confused Brahmaloka with the similar paradise from Buddhism called "Sukhavati." The story about the huge radiant flowers comes from chapter 16 of the Longer Sukhavativyuha. There is only one lotus associated with Brahma, the one in which he emerged from Narayana. Sukhavati is controlled by a Buddha named Amitabha who has no obvious connection to any Hindu god. The article could use some supervised rewrites from people more knowledgeable in the subject than the original editors. Quixilver391 (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

References