Talk:Broken Stone in Uji Bridge
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Calligraphy?
[edit]I'm lost. How can an inscription in stone be an "example of Japanese calligraphy"? Calligraphically influenced writing, perhaps; but, being very ignorant of these matters, I hesitate to "correct" this. -- Hoary (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Kindly have a look at the Japanese calligraphy article. The monument is cited as the earliest example of Japanese calligraphy; many such writings have only been preserved as stone engravings. Before they were incised by a mason, typically a calligrapher would have written them on the prepared stone. Steipe (talk) 02:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Article title
[edit]Can we find a better title for the article? "Uji Bridge monument" might work, even though only a fragment survives; "Uji Bridge monument fragment" more completely describes the object but it's kind of long. Fg2 (talk) 04:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- I believe that is the correct translation of the monument as it is known in Japan. Please correct me if I am wrong, then it should be moved. As a proper name, there is no better title than its name. This is also the name under which I found the image in Commons. Steipe (talk) 03:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Is it a proper name in English? If so, it should probably stay where it is. But if it's a proper name in Japanese that has been translated variously into English, or hasn't been previously translated, we can try something different. Fg2 (talk) 10:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- The name was introduced by User:Amagase in the original version of the Japanese calligraphy article, May 2007. I myself would not presume to second-guess his knowledge and sense for a suitable translation. (See also the notes at Image:Ujibashi Danpi.jpg) Steipe (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- The stub-content doesn't help much. Is this a broken stone that is part of the extant bridge? In other words, is there an Uji Bridge somewhere in Japan (now), and this stone is part of the construction material? That's what the title sounds like. Otherwise, going strictly off the Japanese title, I would translate it to Uji Bridge monument fragment, which would be a fragment of a monument that marked where a bridge was constructed.Boneyard90 (talk) 20:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Broken Stone in Uji Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610221306/http://www.pref.kyoto.jp/archives/shiryo11/fsbunrui/k01070.html to http://www.pref.kyoto.jp/archives/shiryo11/fsbunrui/k01070.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501175950/http://hananoen.city.uji.kyoto.jp:80/spotlist/index3.html to http://hananoen.city.uji.kyoto.jp/spotlist/index3.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)