Talk:Bruce Goff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 6 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BoomSoom.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precedents[edit]

Entry previously read "...Goff's mature work has no precedents and, as yet, no heirs." To anyone familiar with the works of both Goff and of Bart Prince, this statement is nonsensical. Prince worked for (and with) Goff over the course of twenty years, and was clearly influenced by him. There is a direct lineage passing from Goff to Prince. I've amended the statement to the following, more accurate one: "Goff's mature work had no precedents and he has had few heirs other than his former assistant, the New Mexico architect Bart Prince." Bricology 07:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just moved here from article[edit]

I just cut this new edit out

"The Bavinger House is no longer visible from the road. It was reported that Nick Harm of OU stated "as long as the Bavingers own the house, no support will ever occur. That's just how we do business." - Nick Harm. It was reported that the house was destroyed in an effort to stop day and night harassment toward the Bavingers after several family members were killed in an effort to take the house. "

We can't really report "It was reported", put it in quotes and do so without a source. Also the phrase "killed in an effort to take the house." means nother to me. Killed trying to take a fort I can understand, but not this. I beleieve that there is important information here, but I don't feel that this edit does it right. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Material on sexual misconduct charges[edit]

The material describing the sexual misconduct charges was just removed with an edit summary described as "removing inaccuracies". (see diff) However, the content was supported by a citation to an article published in the New York Times. So, it is verifiable information. It does not appear to me to have undue weight, and I would argue that it belongs in the article. I've asked the editor who removed the content to engage in a conversation hear. However, the editor account has only ever been used the one time, so we may not hear back. If not, I propose to return the content to the article. Thoughts? --Lquilter (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why this minor scandal is so important to an article about someone who is famous for his groundbreaking architecture. In any case, we need to say what the source says. It doesn't actually say he was homosexual, just that he was accused by someone of having an improper (presumably homosexual) relationship with a student and that he was forced to resign. It doesn't say the relationship actually happened and the whole thing was likely a smear campaign by someone who disliked him or wanted his job. His actual sexuality is unverifiable, and in my view, irrelevant to the article. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 19:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion of his sexual misconduct charge is important to understand why he left a university. The material should stay. I disagree with the hint that artists should not be held to the same laws as the rest of us.Pete unseth (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This comment doesn't respond to the problems raised by "Who is John Galt". Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Sexual misconduct charge revisited[edit]

On April 3, 2015, unlinked User Budalina deleted the paragraph about the allegation that Goff had "...endanger{ed} the morals of a minor." I have reverted this change. Even though the original citation now has a dead link because the article has been removed from the web, that does not mean the subject paragraph is false. There are enough other articles still on the web to indicate that the information is corrrect. This issue has been addressed before on this talk page. It should not continue to be used as a battleground for an edit war.Bruin2 (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That level of detail is unnecessary scandalmongering. The man wasn't convicted or even legally charged with anything and Wikipedia does not need to repeat minute details of many-decades-old allegations that were never proven or even brought to a trial. The only people who know why Goff left were himself and the university. Wikipedia is not the National Enquirer. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT: I've found two sources that state that this was almost certainly a smear campaign due to Goff's homosexuality. The sentence has been edited to say what the various sources say rather than the WP:SYNTHESIS / WP:OR like sentence that was there before. Kindzmarauli (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • We certainly have to maintain a careful line between giving inappropriate weight to accusations that were used to persecute someone, while reflecting that the persecution was real, and significant to Goff. Leaving out the information altogether doesn't reflect the fact that he was persecuted with accusations of sexual impropriety. To my mind, the information about the accusations should be kept in, but contextualized as part of the persecution. We don't need to re-hash the evidence from the accusations, which would tend to sensationalize the accusations and perpetuate the persecution. --Lquilter (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seabees[edit]

How could Goff have enlisted in the Seabees, then later became a professor in 1942? The Seabees were not formed before 1942! `` 02:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:989:4200:88D:697D:5FF:9336:A846 (talk)

I doubt that Goff joined Oklahoma University while he was on active military duty constructing Marine facilities in the Aleutian Islands. A different source says that Goff joined OU as a professor in 1947 (2 years after his discharge) and was subsequently named department chairman. Perhaps someone mistook a 7 for a 2 while transcribing from original documents. It can happen easily, especially when sourcing from original material that was originally created manually or with old fashioned equipment.Bruin2 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bruce Goff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bruce Goff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bruce Goff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

additional coverage[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bruce_Goff&oldid=1218466355"