Jump to content

Talk:Buses in Melbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non neutral

[edit]

The "bus network is a shambles"? Sources definitely needed to back up a loaded, POV statement like that. The "Overview" paragraph really needs a rework to become NPOV. Stevage 08:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, I really did, to rewrite that "General Overview" to NPOV standard, but the whole paragraph was an undiluted rant full of emotive language. Completely true of course, but so hopelessly and unsalvageably POV that I regretfully deleted it. Was going to move it to a "Criticisms" section (the last refuge of the scoundrel!) but could find no sources to back up the claims and complaints. --Canley 04:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Ventura OR History of Buses in Melbourne

[edit]

The history section reads like the history page from the Ventura website, if I didn't live in Melbourne, I'd think Ventura was the only historical bus company in Melbourne. Sohan.s 14:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Less frequented?

[edit]

User:Fremantle99 changed the description of the bus network from "a major form of public transport in Melbourne" to "less frequented...". I don't regard that as a helpful edit. Without the buses, the system would collapse anyway. I see no point in this change. "Less frequented" would only make sense if one was directly comparing systems, and that's not the purpose of this article. I reverted, and he simply reverted back. I won't revert again, but I seek sensible discussion. HiLo48 (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't revert it back, I just added a reference to support my claim. If you don't regard this as a helpful edit, feel free to edit it to it's original state Aneditor (talk tome) — Preceding undated comment added 09:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will. HiLo48 (talk) 01:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buses in Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another useful link. http://www.emelbourne.net.au/biogs/EM00269b.htm 123Matt (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Article about early use of Daimler buses http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/87754650# 123Matt (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent developments

[edit]

This entire section looks very old for "recent". Metlink haven't been around since 2012, and have been replace by PTV. Significant history, yes. Not recent however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian May (talk • contribs) 03:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Buses in Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Bus & Coach Society of Victoria" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bus & Coach Society of Victoria. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New tag

[edit]

 UniversityShuttle  university shuttle is a tag similar to the smartbus and nightbus tag it does not have a target article and is primarily there just to indicate the said route is a university shuttle NotOrrio (talk) 12:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Buses_in_Melbourne&oldid=1200473722"