Talk:Catherine Tyldesley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Coronation Street

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coronation Street, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Coronation Street and its characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Coronation StreetWikipedia:WikiProject Coronation StreetTemplate:WikiProject Coronation StreetCoronation Street articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

Within seconds of posting this article, quite well-researched, an editor deleted it as 'blatant advertising'. It is no such thing. Several other lead actors in the BBC TV series have Wikipedia entries. The tone is neutral enough. Even where I cited a claimed 'good ear for accents' I used the expression 'reputedly'. Of course, all Wikipedia entries are subject to editing and revision but to delete it out of hand is dramatic and excessive.

This modest and uncontroversial little article seems to be experiencing a difficult birth. Assuming good faith on the part of the previous editor I have included the references where the facts came from in the reference section and removed the infobox relating to ‘unverifiable sources’ (sic). The only other matter that seems to be contended is whether 10 episodes of a prime-time BBC series as one of the leads would qualify a person for notability. (An entry in IMDB doesn’t, of course.) I understand the objection and it’s a fine point but I think it just about does, particularly in view of the fact that such TV appearances are not the only ones this actress has made. I’ve read, though I haven’t included it in the article, that this actress is currently filming another major role for the BBC in the series ‘Miss Florence’. I didn’t include it as there was only sketchy information about it. I’ve left off the link to the agency which an unforgiving editor could consider linkspam (a new term for me) even though it wasn’t intended as such, as it seems to duplicate information available elsewhere.

Artdesigns2006 10:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080520015836/http://www.salfordadvertiser.co.uk:80/news/s/1040675_catherine_relishes_role_in_bbc_show to http://www.salfordadvertiser.co.uk/news/s/1040675_catherine_relishes_role_in_bbc_show

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Cake-gate"?!?[edit]

This section is tabloid trivia. If it must be included, hopefully a sensible editor will prune this down to a proportionate amount of text in the "personal" section. It should not have its own section nor should it be a back-and-forth replay of the conversations. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]