Talk:Catholic Medical Association

Catholic Medical Students Association was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Catholic Medical Association. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abortion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion

I added this page because it is an association that publishes journals that are referenced in Wikipedia. I did not know what the assoc was and was surprised that it had no Wiki-entry. It has many physician members and publishes journals, and is mentioned in other Wiki-pages. It needs a Wiki-page. period. History2007 (talk) 02:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then prove notability per WP:ORG. Period. Ironholds (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There you go: [1], and [2] many hits on big newspapers via Google. Period. History2007 (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google isn't a way to directly ascertain notability, but if you have references from news hits and whatever why not include them in the first place? Ironholds (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am busy now, may get to it later... You can add it if you have time. There are plenty. History2007 (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My point is why didn't you include them initially, it would've saved a lot of time. Ironholds (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ironholds, there's no reason to think that adding the sources initially would have saved any of History2007's time: it's the same level of work whether s/he does it this week or next. It might have saved your time, but that's not a strong argument in favor of History2007 doing extra work immediately. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ok, ok. I hereby agree to refund exactly 10% of what I have been paid by Wikipedia this week. Where do I send the check? But seriously, the way these things work is that different people add things over time. I started the page on Matthias Stom with just one sentence because he had no entry, and suddenly others added to it. So one person starts, then many add: Wikipedia. History2007 (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I eventually managed to add to the page. It is almost the end of Feb now, and no one else did anything, so I had to do it after all. History2007 (talk) 20:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]